UK Department for Education to schools: Maybe delay signing that 3-year licensing deal for MIS with Education Software Solutions The UK government is advising schools in England to press pause before signing up to a three-year licensing agreement with Education Software Solutions (ESS). As we revealed earlier this week, ESS – formerly owned by Capita but sold to Montagu Private Equity last December for £400m and now in the same group as ParentPay – told …
His claim that people have a choice in February about whether to proceed is incorrect. The terms are, if we don't cancel by the end of December, we are bound to the 3 year contract. There's no option after that date to back out.
Sounds like the CEO of ESS needs to understand his own contracts better.
A CEO lying? I can't believe it. Whatever is the world coming to... And so on and so forth...
To be honest, if you just assume that any words that come out of a CEO's mouth are lies or such a twisted version of the truth such as to be all but lies, then you'll be much closer to the truth than the CEO ever gets...
"Until now SIMS was very much the anomaly."
If all their competitors have three year contracts they could have sold the year long contracts as a unique selling point, but instead they have gone for the short term fix, presumably in order to recoup the cost of the purchase.
Having read a lot of the comments on edugeek it looks as if SIMS was falling behind the others and the new management has seen this and decided to sweat the asset before it slides into irrelevance.
It seems standard practice for these private equity types.
To quote Capt. Jack Sparrow; "Take all you can, give nothing back."
Layers of middle management and bureaucracy
So, like the National Health Service after the Tories & New Tory, sorry, Labour introduced the 'internal market'?
Certain types of infrastructure - law enforcement, health, education, rail, roads etc. - can't & don't operate in a competitive market. Pretending that they do just feathers the nests of ministers & civil servants and their pals.
A private business can be more efficient than a public department - although it's not a law of nature - but not if it is effectively granted a monopoly and massively state-subsidised. Then it just gets efficient at fleecing the public.
SWMBO has just taken early retirement from a UK state secondary school - or academy or whatever it calls itself now - partly because it is all HR departments, business development plans and PR. The top bod is called the Executive Headmaster fer Christ's sake.
And to return topic they are so reliant on the IT systems - including SIMS - that when it falls over they are unable to conduct lessons. They have ripped out all the perfectly serviceable overhead projectors and dry-wipe whiteboards and every classroom now has a vast electronic whiteboard because some educational IT company convinced the management that it would be a sensible way to spend the taxpayers' money that they claim is in such short supply.
I suppose all those PPE contracts for the government - fast tracked to their chums is the way to go forward.
Test and trace so astonishingly bad that we note WE are still paying a £1M a week to contractors.
If taxpayers are fully funding state schools and all schools need a management system, yes you do, just keeping track of where everybody is, is difficult enough let alone all the reporting that has to be done for government. Why not have one mandated system funded directly by government and reap the benefits of scale, or for those who want something custom or different, they can pay for it.
Training costs would be reduced, all data would be easily interchangeable between schools and governement.
Perhaps if it cost the department of education money to change their mind every six months about what data was required it would make them thing hard about the changes.
Then again it could be like the failed test and trace and just be an expensive exercise in poor quality and money shoveled to ministerial mates.
I work shifts in the Broadcast industry.
Many years ago I would get paid time x1.5 for overtime and time x2 if it was a a bank holiday.
Sky entered the market and offered time x1 (i.e. no extra payment) for overtime.
Many broadcasters then trotted out the line that time x1 is now the industry standard overtime rate.
I still work in broadcast, I no longer do overtime.
usually you have a liberal government takeover of the industry with a mandate to impose overtime...
like in France for Y2K where the "Code du Travail" was modified to ensure that IT workers would have to work overtime for no more pay to remove all the bugs.
As a school, you *HAVE* to have a MIS - it is a regulatory requirement.
Moving form one MIS to another is not the action of a moment - it typically takes a year of planning and months to implement.
SIMS is, and always has been, a complete mess of software, but because most schools still use it, Capita (and now ParentPay) merely sit on their hands and watch the cash flowing in
Having worked for a company previously owned by Montagu, they'll be wanting their recurring revenue for minimal upfront investment. And knowing a thing or two about SIMS, the direction of travel will be away from SIMS to cloudy solutions like Arbor, Bromcom etc, but that (as you've said) takes time. The inordinate amount of time they've taken over getting a more modern solution, would also back up the argument that they're sitting on their hands as the money comes in.
As for ParentPay, it's fitting they both now share the same owner... when I had to setup PP when my daughter started secondary school, I got a full on yellow screen of death .NET debug error (on a production server) telling me they were having problems with their SMTP mail.
It didn't seem prudent to store my card details with them...
I once worked for a company that wanted to change the date that we got paid ("merger" with another bigger company meant we had to capitulate to their system). Obviously, we had to agree to this change so they sent an online form around.
The form had a single tick box saying "I agree to this change" and NOTHING ELSE. The only other thing on the form was a note saying that if we didn't complete and return the form they would take it that we had agreed to the change. There was nowhere to say no, give feedback etc.
That was back in the late 90's. Looks like not a lot has changed since then
This change in contract terms is so abusive, I wonder if it would hold up to a legal challenge.
In the US, a contract has several necessary parts: Offer, Consideration, Acceptance, Mutuality, and Competency. US law is often similar to UK law.
On the face of it, this change seems to lack both Acceptance (it takes effect without action) and Mutuality (it's imposed by one party and it's not obvious that schools have the ability to refuse. This is sometimes called "adhesion.")
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
