back to article IBM sued again by its own sales staff: IT giant accused of going back on commission payments promise

IBM has been sued by sales manager Mark Briggs for allegedly capping sales commission payments despite a written commitment not to do so, joining dozens of cases claiming Big Blue screws its sales staff. The lawsuit [PDF], filed in a US federal district court in Northern California on Friday, challenges IBM's practice of …

  1. Snake Silver badge

    This is becoming way too common

    So here I was, discussing corporate double-speak, and IBM attempts to take it to new heights by playing the games in courts of law.

    Whilst still hiring new sales recruits on the commission premise all at the same time.

    I'd like to meet the villainous scum who pull these stunts, just to see if they are as slimy IRL as their actions make them appear.

  2. Daedalus

    Exeunt

    IBM has failed to note what happened at other companies where the sales droids felt their income in jeopardy - a mad dash for the exits followed by an oddly unexpected decline in sales for the company. Selling is selling, and it's usually easy for the good sellers to take their marbles and play elsewhere. Maybe that's what IBM really want - the mass resignations, not the shrinking sales, of course.

    1. David 132 Silver badge

      Re: Exeunt

      IBM doesn’t seem to want any employees who are aged over 35 or based in high-wage Western countries, so I’m sure they’re not that bothered. I’m also sure it’ll work out very badly for them in the long term as they continue their glide-path into utter irrelevance, increasingly trading on their name and long-passed reputation, but hey, by then the CxOs responsible will have retired and it won’t be their problem.

      1. Fruit and Nutcase Silver badge
        Coat

        Re: Exeunt

        On the other hand, if you are a lawyer working for IBM, then, your tenure is assured

      2. Daedalus

        Re: Exeunt

        Yes, just imagine IBM taking pride of place next to Polaroid, on the cheap knock-off shelf in Poundland.

  3. Julz

    Just

    Pay salaries...

    1. Timbo

      Re: Just

      ...but then the sales reps might just sit on their back sides, and drink coffee all day long and complain that they cannot generate sales due to Covid-19/unreliable hardware/a competitor discounting/there's an R in the month etc etc

      And then the bean counters will see that they are being paid too much (for the sales that they are supposed to be generating) and will seek to reduce their salaries and give them an incentive to earn more by offering a commission. This a known way of cutting overheads in many industries...

      And that's where we are. 'Cept Big Blue appears to be reneging on paying the promised commission amounts (alledgedly)...

      1. Intractable Potsherd

        Re: Just

        If people aren't going to do their jobs, then they shouldn't be working. Paying extra for one part of the entire process is inequitable. Put everyone on a salary, and give dividends to everyone based on sales/profit/whatever at the end of the year.

        1. Julz

          Re: Just

          A pretty successful computer firm, DEC, did just that...

        2. Robert Grant

          Re: Just

          Define what "do a job" is in a free market and you're fine. Given you can't, you need to incentivise to figure out the market's state.

        3. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Just

          That worked out really well for communism.... Regardless of how much you may not like it, money motivates people and incentivising sales people generates sales - tying pay to the results of a global monster like IBM is a disincentive as however good you are you have no ability to materially change your take home pay.

          As an ex IBMer I saw what happened when they screwed the technical teams on commission ten years or so ago..... Morale plunged through the floor and no one did anything beyond the bare minimum costing to company sales, and delaying new products - some of which were so late to market as to become irrelevant.

          This is yet another brilliant case showing how accountants ruin companies such as IBM. They know the cost of everything but understand the value of nothing.

    2. dinsdale54

      Re: Just

      That's a fine way to guarantee you won't have many decent sales people.

      Salesfolks are coin operated. This is a feature, not a bug. Take advantage of it by paying generously to people who sell a boatload of stuff.

      1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

        Re: Just

        The ideal salesman is a coke addict with a big car lease and at least 2 ex-wives with support payments.

        1. This post has been deleted by its author

  4. ecofeco Silver badge

    I never get tired of saying it

    Fuck IBM.

    1. FozzyBear

      Re: I never get tired of saying it

      I never get tried of hearing it

    2. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

      Re: I never get tired of saying it

      >Fuck IBM.

      I think that's their new ticker symbol

  5. oldcomputerguy

    Pay 'em what they are worth !

    I never understood this. If a sales person earns $1 million in commissions, how much added revenue did the company get? $100 million? I would kiss the sales peoples feet and honor them as rock stars. If they are that good, why is there any limit on how much they earn? If they earned $100 million in commissions, but brought in $1 billion in revenue, holy moly!!!! What's wrong with these companies ! What IBM is doing is telling their sales force to hit the MINIMUM targets. That's just plain stupid. This is from a company that is slowly dying. Cheat the sales force to hit a quarterly targets to please investors. I would not trust IBM to honor any contract with this nonsense going on.

    1. Paul Kinsler

      Re: Pay 'em what they are worth !

      Or, if they really don't want to pay the same fixed percentage on all sales - which might be considered a reasonable position - just work out a systematic taper scheme where the sales person always gets more for the bigger sale, but just not quite so much more.

    2. Blank Reg

      Re: Pay 'em what they are worth !

      With IBM involved in so many of the world's largest IT disasters, I don't know how they even get any contracts.

      If you want an IT mega-project to be over budget and also fail then IBM is the company for you.

    3. elwe

      Re: Pay 'em what they are worth !

      The problem is that commission isn't a fixed percentage across the board. It takes the same amount of work to do a $50,000 sale as a $50m sale and a $5,000 sale. So the commission percentage has to vary.

      One place I worked had sales droids partitioned into different categories, with different percentages based on the size of deals they were expected to do. Leads were passed to an appropriate sales droid for the size of the lead. If they went above their targets the percentage commission went up for all the sales $ above target. It was fine, until one guy generally doing $5,000-$15,000 sales generated his own lead on a $10m sale, closed it and was owed 50% commission. While this was a US company, the sales droid was UK based, so they had to pay up. He bought a Ferrari and left the company right after they paid out (but did come in and show off the Ferrari).

      1. Imhotep

        Re: Pay 'em what they are worth !

        The same amount of time maybe, but if you tell a salesman who can bring in a million dollar sale that he will be paid the same as someone who can gring in abthousand dollars - you end up with a company of thousand dollar salesmen.

        Good sales people are a special breed. You want to keep them and keep them happy.

    4. Cliffwilliams44 Silver badge

      Re: Pay 'em what they are worth !

      Because "Bean Counter"!

      I've seen this time and again in every company that had a sales force. As soon as the sales people start making "real" money management either changes the plan or puts a cap on commissions. Said caps were never in the original agreement.

      And yes, what happens? The good sales people LEAVE!

    5. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Pay 'em what they are worth !

      The problem with commissioned sales people is that they're paid based on revenue, not income. I've run into too many cases where our sales guy was fighting to keep an unprofitable customer where the sales guy made 100K, the company "made" a small profit until you calculated overhead and the commission cost.

      My suggestion was to pay commission based on something like gross margin. Shot down for "reasons".

      1. dinsdale54

        Re: Pay 'em what they are worth !

        Some companies do pay commission on margin, most don't. However while the salesrep might not be paid on margin you can bet his boss has a margin target. The problem is that the margin changes with the amount you sell. i.e. you sell 3x as much then the %overhead of you being employed has just dropped by 2/3 (OK, oversimplification)

        This is why sales plans tend to have big commission multipliers once you have sold over your target. You have covered your costs to the company so it's all upside from there on.

    6. Imhotep

      Re: Pay 'em what they are worth !

      It seems they have a cunning plan to get rid of their top earners and save a lot of money.

      Yet to come is a cunning plan on how to replace the revenues lost by their first cunning plan.

  6. jason_derp

    This won't end

    Something tells me IBM will manage not to pay anybody in sales anything they were promised, right up until they quit existing because shareholders realize they do nothing and make nothing that anybody is needing or using.

  7. DS999 Silver badge

    Malicious compliance

    Is what's needed. If IBM wants to cap their commission, once they max it out they should take the rest of the year off. Tell their clients "I'll help you out on January 2nd".

    1. FozzyBear

      Re: Malicious compliance

      was going to say the same thing. Nothing says "Pay me my commissions" like no sales for Q2,3 & 4

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Carrot and stick

    They’re going to need a longer stick!

  9. Jonathon Green
    Trollface

    Sales Lizards shafted and IBM in court. Sounds like a double win to me!

  10. Duffaboy
    FAIL

    The thing with sales and commission is

    The salesperson is only focused on their pockets and will sell you anything to get some extra wedge. For me that's not looking after the customer, however it's a double edged sword, no commission no sales, but if you do have commission and you have the preverbal selling sand to ....

  11. Anonymous South African Coward Bronze badge

    Wait, what... so the contract is not enforceable?

    So the salesdroids just have to say "eff off guv", not sign it, and get on with their lives?

  12. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    IBM Pay avoidance

    IBM have always looked for ways to avoid paying people properly. Back when I was at IBM in the early 2000s, the career progression in pre-sales was wait for the older guys with final salary pensions to retire or go into sales. I tried the sales route. Did 140% of my target but anythj g over 140% needed EMEA sign off so my manager changed my target two weeks before year end.

    I went back to presales and left IBM four months later.

  13. Blackjack Silver badge

    So... why are people still working for IBM?

    Is that hard to get a new job?

  14. Uncle Ron

    Same, same...

    This is certainly not new at IBM. Thirty years ago, I was part of a 3 or 4 person team that sold a huge deal to a university. My share of the commission would have been 10's of thousands. In today's dollars--probably $60 or $70K. I got nothing. The branch manager simply didn't like me. So he cut me out. They didn't give more to the other guys, they just didn't pay me. I didn't fight it because it was a time in my life when I didn't want to lose my job--part of the calculation I'm sure. The quota letters were the same then as now: "Not a promise or a guarantee. Not a contract," and, "at-will employment." I heard many stories of guys earning million dollar commissions that simply weren't paid. They just couldn't stomach the idea of paying a salesman a million dollars. An IBM Director once actually told me, "The product sells itself. We don't really need sales people." I am certain that the IBM Company and it's shareholders have been paying for this attitude for decades.

  15. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

    A cunning and subtle plan

    Problem:

    Having riffed all the experienced engineers and replaced them with offshore call centres working from a script, IBM has a problem with unhappy customers

    Soln:

    Get rid of all the sale-persons - so no more customers

    Triples and bonuses all round !

    1. This post has been deleted by its author

  16. Throatwarbler Mangrove Silver badge
    WTF?

    Refuse to pay salespeople . . .

    . . . pay lawyers instead? It seems like IBM may not have thought their cunning plan all the way through.

  17. This post has been deleted by its author

    1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

      Re: Buh Buh Buh Diversity!

      >Diversity in leadership ensures a better company, or so we're told.

      I hope no-one tells Microsoft, Nvidia, AMD, GOOGLE, ZOOM etc

      1. This post has been deleted by its author

  18. a_yank_lurker

    Round Whatever??

    Itsy Bitsy Morons seem to like to be court by not paying the sales team their commissions. The manglement is not paying attention. Other than big iron and Red Hat, they do not have a product that is truly competitive and I am not so sure about the big iron. Red Hat is competitive but there are other Linux server distros available that are just as capable. There is one product that a tech savvy person would consider without much coaxing; the rest are also rans.

  19. xyz123 Silver badge

    Why doesn't an IBM rival simply poach its top salespeople (all of them) and cripple IBM.

    IBM is like old yeller anyway, and needs to be t̶a̶k̶e̶n̶ ̶o̶u̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶b̶a̶c̶k̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶w̶o̶o̶d̶ ̶s̶h̶e̶d̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶s̶h̶o̶t̶ Sent to live on a lovely farm.

    1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

      Remember nobody ever got hired for working for IBM

  20. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    End of IBM on Dow Jones

    What will IBM be removed from the Dow Jones? They are just a shadow of their former self. Their market cap now not much larger than other smaller IT companies who are less than 10 years old. It's really time they are removed and replaced by another company (like they were years ago).

    They have squandered their dominance of IT from just a few decades ago. I guess even Jeff Bezos said Amazon will die one day .... “Day Two is stasis. Followed by irrelevance. Followed by excruciating, painful decline. Followed by death. And that is why it is always Day One,” Bezos answered.

    They way they treat their staff is testament to them accelerating their irrelevance and demise.

    1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

      Re: End of IBM on Dow Jones

      Ironic if Lenovo bought IBM just for the stock of old logo'ed laptop bags

  21. Potemkine! Silver badge

    Do it the soviet way

    "When they will stop pretending they are paying wages, workers will stop pretending they are working"

  22. SgtPapa

    IBM Senior Sales executives seem to enjoy screwing sales people

    As someone that was hosed for a 6 figure commission by IBM I can attest that they will treat you like garbage if they can.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like