Bribed or Extorted
"These bribes took the form of monetary payments to nonprofits and business entities controlled by Choi, as well as the gift of thoroughbred horses to be used by Choi's horse-riding daughter, Chung Yoo-Ra. In exchange, Lee received government sign-off on deals that would allow him to cement control of Samsung."
Q1. Was the sign off legitimate? I don't see anyone rolling back Lee Jae-Yong control of Samsung, like that decision was legitimate, and should have been made anyway.
Q2. If Lee hadn't made those bribes would that corrupt President have blocked that decision or worse force it to someone else who would pay the bribes? i.e. it is more extortion or bribery?
If faced with a "you gotta do me a favor though", President, I can believe yong would have little choice, as did many politicians did, and many government departments did, and so many foreign governments did "favors though", ....many many many foreign governments.
You would only find out about the corruption when one refuses to do the bribe.
In such a situation, what would Lee do? Demand impeachment? Rely on the independence of the DOJ ? Got to 'Fox News Asia' and expose the scandal of a corrupt president? You could *not* rely on institutions, that had already decided power trumped democracy and rule of law, and had already sold out their country.
Or would he do the deal? Pump money into family businesses of the corrupt president, give those gifts, promote those foreign intelligence propaganda pieces he demanded, bribe the 'horse-riding daughter' with gifts, and suck it up, like others had done.