All I got when I was 18 was a very brief freefall experience on Oblivion at Alton Towers.
Buyer of $28m Blue Origin space ticket has a scheduling conflict – so this teen will go instead
A Dutch 18-year-old is set to be the youngest person to go into space after securing at the last minute a seat on Blue Origin’s first commercial spaceflight. Oliver Daemen will ride atop the aerospace upstart's New Shepard rocket, which is expected to launch on July 20. And he’ll have Blue Origin supremo Jeff Bezos, Bezos’ …
COMMENTS
-
-
-
Friday 16th July 2021 09:58 GMT Danny 2
My 18th birthday was a company (burr brown) pub party because it was the first time they'd made a profit. I wouldn't have went except a guy from stores was going and he was born the same day in the same town and I wanted to investigate him. He got off with a 28 year old barmaid who he'd been screwing for a while.
I just got free drinks. I had a wee round table in front of me full of free drinks. I'm creative though, so the drinks were in a rainbow of colours.
Red and yellow and pink and green
Purple and orange and blue
I can drink a rainbow
Drink a rainbow
Drink a rainbow too
Disclaimer: I can also spew a rainbow
-
-
Friday 16th July 2021 07:36 GMT jake
Re: Time to change the rules
To be fair, Wally's an astronaut ... but on this trip, she's just a passenger on board what is in essence a Vomit Comet taken to it's illogical conclusion.
Perhaps we should change the "been into space" meaning from "poked nose above Kármán Line" to something more along the lines of "entered stable orbit requiring engine firing to return to Earth".
-
Friday 16th July 2021 08:49 GMT Flocke Kroes
Re: Time to change the rules
Orbit is about 30x as difficult as space so I am a bit of a snob about orbit compared to space. I am sure there have been plenty of mission specialists who were not pilots. They were effectively cargo on the way up and down but did useful research and maintenance while in space. I am quite happy calling them astronauts along with pilots in pressure suits who flew experimental aircraft to over 80km altitude without performing scientific research with their other hands.
$1M to 19 charities is more than I have ever done and probably exceeds the sum of everyone else here too. Although "space tourist" may be a more accurate term I am not going to get angry about Jeff+fellow travellers getting called astronauts. The world is far from perfect but please try to see some of the good bits rather than focusing entirely on the bad and spending a shortened life being angry all the time.
-
Friday 16th July 2021 09:05 GMT jake
Re: Time to change the rules
As I said, Wally's an astronaut. Did the training, should have had the oportunity to go into space decades ago. The other three are just tourists ... not even that, really. What is the proper noun for a rider of amusement park rides?
The payload specialists & etc. who spend time in space are definitely astronauts, they've been through the training and spent enough time up there to do meaningful work. I would say the early test pilots in the astronaut programs are also included. But the three pure "look at me, I'm rich!" tourists? Not so much.
Who is angry? Just musing on the obvious need for the English Language to mutate a little bit once again.
-
-
Saturday 17th July 2021 19:51 GMT jake
Re: Time to change the rules
Way to quote out of context. What they went through was a lot more extensive than a psych exam. They also did a lot of physical testing, and training ... which NASA ignored, being the misogynistic good ol' boys club that it was in the early '60s.
If anybody cares, look up The Mercury 13.
Link for the anti-pointy-clicky: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_13
.
-
Tuesday 20th July 2021 19:21 GMT Dom 3
Re: Time to change the rules
Like I wrote - "physiological screening".
It was Eisenhower that decreed that the Mercury astronauts should be military test pilots.
These days of course it has been mandated that the next American moon landing will include the first woman on the moon. Why can't she be chosen on merit? Why the tokenism?
FWIW - for a Mars shot I reckon an all-female crew makes a lot of sense. Although that of course will never happen.
-
Tuesday 20th July 2021 21:19 GMT jake
Re: Time to change the rules
Sorry, mea culpa, for some reason I read that as "psychological screening". They also did that ... and quite extensively,too. My point was that their training was pretty close to the same as the actual astronauts, but without the physical NASA space mock-up training aids.
As you wrote: "Why can't she be chosen on merit? Why the tokenism?"
Because Tokenism is the new black; It's what is in fashion these days. Who needs merit when we've got a quota to fill‽‽‽
Paraphrasing Malcolm X: “What gains? All you have gotten is tokenism — three or four Women in a job, or at a lunch counter, or on the Moon, or as Vice President, so the rest of you will be quiet.”
-
-
-
-
Friday 16th July 2021 13:17 GMT rg287
Re: Time to change the rules
I am sure there have been plenty of mission specialists who were not pilots. They were effectively cargo on the way up and down but did useful research and maintenance while in space. I am quite happy calling them astronauts along with pilots in pressure suits who flew experimental aircraft to over 80km altitude without performing scientific research with their other hands.
I'm not sure the suggestion was to draw a direct comparison of "pilot = astronaut", more "crew vs. passengers". Mission specialists still had the capability to perform significant crew duties and will have cross-trained for a bunch of tasks that they are not expected to actually perform except in an emergency.
Many of a ship's crew are not bridge crew or helm-trained. They might not be involved in the intricacies of casting off from a quayside or getting from a harbour to the open sea. There's nonetheless a difference between crew and passengers.
-
Saturday 17th July 2021 18:08 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Time to change the rules
Angry at perceived anger? What if your perception is wrong? Then you are "spending a shortened life being angry" for nothing. Oops.
The good bits are Bezos and passengers are enjoying themselves and providing employment for people who want to work with rockets.
I think there is unlikely to be any lasting contribution to science, however.
The charity angle seems pretty unrelated to me - the scale is so different. Bezos spends about 3 billion a year on Blue Horizon.
-
-
Friday 16th July 2021 13:08 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Time to change the rules
IMHO you're an astronaut if you're part of the working crew of a "ship" going into space. And you're needed and trained to operate the ship or perform the ship tasks in space - even if you're not the pilot. Otherwise you're passenger.
And still nobody woulds say a flight attendant, or even needed operators on military planes, are "aviators". Air(wo)man, yes.
Anyway soon this way the term will become inflated, and real astronauts will need a new name.
And it's not being angry, but I don't like when words are emptied of their real meaning.
-
Friday 16th July 2021 13:20 GMT rg287
Re: Time to change the rules
Anyway soon this way the term will become inflated, and real astronauts will need a new name.
Yes, ultimately having a separate word for "someone who has been to space" will be a bit redundant.
You'll have flight crew, passengers, etc just like flying. You might be a frequent flyer, but you're still a a passenger.
We're just in that awkward transition phase where the market starts to open up from a handful of pioneers to "public access".
-
-
-
Friday 16th July 2021 15:18 GMT yetanotheraoc
Re: Time to change the rules
"After all, nobody gets pilot wings being a passenger on an airplane."
Not true! I was given wings as a small child. Made me so happy. But even I knew better than to claim it made me a pilot. This "youngest astronaut" claim reminds me of the fallacy of the beard, i.e. one whisker does not equal a beard. There are those who are clearly astronauts, there are those who are arguably astronauts, and there are those who are definitely not astronauts. What is the word for someone who is definitely not an astronaut, but says they are?
-
Saturday 17th July 2021 20:01 GMT jake
Re: Time to change the rules
I got THREE sets! One from BOAC, one from Pan Am and one from TWA :-)
Flying BOAC as an American family in the mid 1960s was an exercise in frustration ... the Very British ground and cabin staff were even more snooty towards Yanks than most ElReg commentards. We only flew them twice ... Dad figured the first time was a fluke. In his mind, no public facing company could be that rude to it's customers and stay in business for very long. I guess he didn't realize they were State owned ...
-
Sunday 18th July 2021 08:50 GMT Danny 14
Re: Time to change the rules
heady days. I remember being allowed to talk to the captain and look in the aircraft cockpit as a teenager. I was in the ATC at the time and the captain was ex ATC. I was given a small enamel wings too, we chatted about flying as I was half way through my glider pilots at the time. Granted this was 40 years ago, in a different era.
As for the article, if I had this much disposable income i'd jump at the chance to be a real kerbal.
-
-
-
Friday 16th July 2021 07:28 GMT Paul Herber
Blue Origin Ticket
Blue Origin Ticket
Anyone interested?
This may be of interest to one of you. A friend of mine has a ticket
for a flight on Blue Origin. He paid $28 million, but he didn't
realise when he bought it that it was going to be the same day as his
Covid 19 postponed wedding. If you are interested, he is looking for
someone to take his place.
It's at Pontypridd Registry Office, at 4.30pm. The Bride's name is
Megan, she's 29, about 5'4", quite pretty, has her own income and
is a really good cook.
<paraphrased from a rugby ticket joke>
-
Friday 16th July 2021 08:23 GMT Ali Dodd
only SOME of the 28 mill is going to charity?
"At least some of the money from the auction will go to Blue Origin’s non-profit firm Club for the Future, which will donate $1m to 19 charities."
So Bezos the richest
scumbagman in the work will pocket most of the 27 mill left? Oh god we are so screwed by the rich.-
Saturday 17th July 2021 15:53 GMT Jon 37
Re: only SOME of the 28 mill is going to charity?
The money is going to Blue Origin, not Jeff Bezos personally.
Building and testing and launching the rocket wasn't free. It was an investment made in the hope of making money by selling tickets in future. Like the way every other startup company works.
28 million is actually not that much compared to how much has already been invested in this.
Be thankful that some of the money is going to charity. Don't begrudge the company it's revenue.
-
Friday 16th July 2021 09:11 GMT Howard Sway
"Now I'll become the youngest astronaut ever because I'm 18 years old"
No, you'll become the youngest astronaut ever because your dad is a multimillionaire willing to spend millions on a brief joyride for his spoilt son.
It'll be the best 3 minutes of your life, until you get to university and find an attractive someone who's impressed with your "I've been to space" brags.
-
-
Friday 16th July 2021 14:19 GMT tiggity
Re: Source of wealth
Given the name of the financial services company, is it by any chance related to a financial company that Jacob Rees Mogg* is involved with as the names are suspiciously similar & cannot think of a great reason for "Somerset" being main part of a Dutch company name?
* I was really well behaved & did not add a #ToryScum hashtag
-
-
Monday 19th July 2021 23:28 GMT jake
Re: Scheduling Conflict???
That was my take on it, too. He paid his money to embiggen[0] himself in the eyes of <somebody(s)>, thinking there was no way it would ever happen. And then it did, so he chickened out, the nameless, faceless over-bidder with more money than brains that he is.
Playmobil at eleven.[1]
And you wonder why he'll remain an AC 'til his dying days ...
[0] Hey, it's a perfectly good ElReg word!
[1] Doesn't this whole spoiled billionaire vs. spoiled billionaire cat-fight deserve a full-blown ElReg Playmobil reconstruction? Or is it just me?
-