Stasi
That is all.
Plans by the German government to allow the police to deploy malware on any target's devices, and force the tech world to help them, has run into some opposition, funnily enough. In an open letter this month, the Chaos Computer Club – along with Google, Facebook, and others – said they are against proposals to dramatically …
> They normally take that kind of things very seriously.
The population in general, yes. But we do have a few politicians that are in favor of all the insane crap like forbidding (or at least back-dooring) encryption. Those, without exception, don't have the slightest idea about how cryptography works, to absolutely nobody's surprise.
Wanting to put spyware on computers is a bit low even for those arsewipes.
> we do have a few politicians that are in favor of all the insane crap like forbidding (or at least back-dooring) encryption.
Back in... fuck, 2009, they also had the "brilliant" idea of it being a crime to have "hacker tools" without an appropriate license, and proceeded to implement a definition so broad that it included.... Perl and Python.
El Reg wrote about it at the time https://www.theregister.com/2009/06/07/germany_hacker_tool_law/
So, yeah, no real surprise in this latest one
TikTok has quietly updated its terms and conditions to allow itself to collect biometric data on users, including “faceprints and voiceprints,”"
Fortunately no-one uses biometrics like face or voice to control access to their devices or private data, so there can be absolutely no problems as a result of this sort of data grab.