Even worse than leaving an unencrypted USB stick on a train :-(
UK Special Forces soldiers' personal data was floating around WhatsApp in a leaked Army spreadsheet
An astonishing data security blunder saw the personal data of Special Forces soldiers circulating around WhatsApp in a leaked British Army spreadsheet. The document, seen by The Register, contained details of all 1,182 British soldiers recently promoted from corporal to sergeant – including those in sensitive units such as the …
COMMENTS
-
-
Wednesday 2nd June 2021 15:49 GMT Paul Hovnanian
"leaving an unencrypted USB stick on a train"
On purpose or by accident?
On this side of the pond, we had personnel data on security clearances go missing often enough that I became convinced that some subcontractor was taking kickbacks for periodically misplacing it. That the British Army data ended up on WhatsaApp makes me think it was just ideologically motivated. Foreign intelligence usually does't post the stuff that they capture.
-
-
-
-
Saturday 5th June 2021 00:15 GMT the Jim bloke
Re: Example != Definition
Military Intelligence is a specific thing, seized upon by self styled "wits" and mocked to make themselves appear clever and daring.
Other examples of true oxymorons would be "political integrity" or "business ethics"
Like other oxymorons, these combinations of words mean something antithetical to the definitions of their components - and I am not mocking, I am mourning...
-
-
Thursday 3rd June 2021 15:03 GMT amanfromMars 1
A Blood Red Line Only the Thickest of Fools' Tools would Cross and Defile to Deserve No Mercy.
If one
hadhas any idea or direct knowledge at all about what Elite Special Forces do, and can do for and to y'all too, you'd best hope that it is stupidity rather than malicious intent that has brought you to their undivided attention or vice versa, your shenanigans to their Sterling Stirling Business ....... and Raison d'Être for Existence in Exercise of Extremely Prejudicial Covert and/or Clandestine Operations ........ which in most cases be successful tours of a patriotic patriarchal psychotic duty to extremes of self-indulgent excellence and rectifying fortitude. -
Monday 7th June 2021 08:48 GMT Joe W
Left hand and right hand
Here we have a saying about one hand not knowing what the other hand does.
My army experience tells me, that the right hand does not know of the existence of the left hand.
In my current job: The (supposedly) brain forces both hands to actively ignore each others' existence.
-
-
-
Wednesday 2nd June 2021 16:05 GMT JimboSmith
Even worse than leaving an unencrypted USB stick on a train :-(
Far worse and a really dumb thing to do. Even if they'd password protected the spreadsheet everyone (so potentially 80k people) would have to use the same password. So the chances of that one password leaking to somebody unauthorized are far higher.
My current company requires you to use an encrypted memory stick for moving anything around even if there are no personal details. If there are, then you need to encrypt the spreadsheet etc. as well.
-
-
-
Friday 4th June 2021 14:20 GMT amanfromMars 1
Much prized, but understandably, seldom lauded or admitted via any claim of responsibility
Special Forces personnel are trained to delete people, not data, the PFY is not going to get a job with the military. .... Version 1.0
Traditional and conventional Special Forces personnel are certainly trained to delete people, Version 1.0, however, to not think, and to fail to realise Great Games have moved on and up a number of tiers to completely new levels of absurd complexity and astute ACTive engagement with more than just one trick circus ponies to pacify the crowds now vulnerable to the reign of clouds, and miss the fact that the Special Forces of Tomorrow Today are an entirely different breed of exceptional being, has one nicely permanently rendered at a convenient disadvantage to them, and at their mercy, should one's own choice of malevolent actions cause them to choose to rectify matters.
And some are able to be deadly effective whenever only equipped with pyjamas ...... https://youtu.be/LcgG_E9gQJM?t=54 ..... for there are any number of Elite Keyboard Warriors comfortably embedded in their midsts and enjoying the mutually advantageous security and protection each gives the other in the exercise of each of their many particular and peculiar skillsets.
Do you find that pleasantly comforting or extremely troubling? And would the latter be because of your enthusiasm for a number of extremely troubling actions or even the sharing of thoughts to incite such actions?
-
-
-
Thursday 3rd June 2021 11:04 GMT thondwe
MS provide the tools to secure files using Azure AD/365 accounts - but of course that's $$$$ and resources to manage... Also, there's the question of whether this is an official MOD WhatsApp business account - assuming such a thing exists and adds some level of control, a personal account using a work phone or worse still a personal phone...
CARELESS
-
-
-
Thursday 3rd June 2021 10:33 GMT Cuddles
What makes you think the Army have anything to do with Whatsapp? The article says the leaked document is being sent to other people using Whatsapp. That's equivalent to saying it's being shared using email - it has nothing to do with how it was originally accessed or how it was leaked. Indeed, it's rather odd to see El Reg using phrases like "available to download on Whatsapp", given that there is no such thing as being available to download on Whatsapp. If someone sends you a message with an attachment, you can view that attachment, just as you could if someone emailed it to you. You can't go wandering around Whatsapp looking for things to download.
The actual news here is that the army appear to have really shitty privacy procedures involving confidential documents being available to tens of thousands of people with essentially no security or access control, making leaks inevitable. The details of which messaging services have been used by various people to share a document after it has been leaked is of no interest whatsoever.
-
-
-
Wednesday 2nd June 2021 14:51 GMT Potemkine!
sharing newly promoted people’s personal details in a spreadsheet accessible by the entire 80,000-strong British Army was routine
What a great idea. Especially in GPRD times.
Those involved can apply to win this trophy.
-
Thursday 3rd June 2021 10:21 GMT Piro
Yep, fantastic
That's what I thought, too. They don't seem to understand how amazingly unacceptable that is.
"Usually we just allow anyone in the armed forces to look at very sensitive data regarding all personnel, with an Excel password, on the intranet".
This is bizarre and utterly insecure. I don't think I've ever worked at even the most amateurish of companies that just flat out had a list of everyone's details in an Excel spreadsheet with full access to all on the intranet.
-
-
-
Wednesday 2nd June 2021 15:55 GMT Dave 15
Several thoughts
Once upon a time the army had a separate network which would have avoided this, I guess a bean counter thought they would save the mod money by having its personnel killed off instead of paying pensions.
Second there is no reason on earth why the whole army needs to see every promotion in the army so the decision to publish it was stupid, probably driven by some left wing political correctness bull shit
-
-
-
-
Thursday 3rd June 2021 15:26 GMT WolfFan
Re: Several thoughts
Oh, my. All Sgt Mjrs are polite, reserved, quiet, laid-back, surfer dudes. All of them. They would never let a word which could be considered impolite pass their lips. To suggest otherwise is just wrong. You’ll receive the Ultimate Punishment: you’ll be sent to bed without your supper.
-
-
-
-
Thursday 3rd June 2021 11:35 GMT teamonster
Re: Several thoughts
I'm wondering how much of the ills of Britain in general can be laid at the feet of these people.
Back in the 90's I wound up on a training scheme run by the government. Several of us on the same course decided to get together and compare notes. To our surprise, we found that several of us had different course documentation, even though we were supposed to be on the same course. We touched base with our 'trainer', who spent all day in his office and we only saw when he was either entering or leaving the premises. We were told 'sorry, but some of you got the wrong course documents.' Barely a shrug that we could have failed the course when we arrived at the final and it was for a different discipline than what we were studying. We taught each other and prevailed, but it was all our own doing.
I have found similar amounts of care and attention at other businesses I have worked for - many of them large international companies. I wonder continuously how our history would have been different if these ass hats - who seem to be everywhere - had not muddled up just about everything they touch.
-
Thursday 3rd June 2021 17:33 GMT yetanotheraoc
Re: Several thoughts
"I wonder continuously how our history would have been different if these ass hats - who seem to be everywhere - had not muddled up just about everything they touch."
The first law of business is scarcity. Capital is scarce, raw materials are scarce, talent is scarce. Not only is there no money to hire the best workers, there is no money to hire the best managers. There is barely enough money to pay for the (a priori) best CEO. (Just kidding.) The ass hats do not just seem to be everywhere -- they *are* everywhere.
The sad thing about this is that the MoD, both yours and ours, is supposed to be well aware of this scarcity. The MoD's over-arching talent is *supposed* to be creating robust systems which allow for sub-optimal talent to be plugged into various tasks and still accomplish an acceptable quality of work. Big systemic fail here.
-
Thursday 3rd June 2021 22:25 GMT Terry 6
Re: Several thoughts
To many things missing from that.
There's the Peter Principle
Dunning-Kruger
A class system that emphasises knowing (or being) the "right people" over meritocracy*
And above all, the products of the above making bloody sure that no one more competent than themselves gets a chance to be in charge or, God forbid, change things.
*A bit of research into the background and career of Toby Young will tell you all you need to know (not Wikipaedia - which says almost nothing). This will do as a starting point- though I'm no lover of the Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/shortcuts/2019/mar/13/us-admissions-scandal-oxbridge
-
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 2nd June 2021 17:26 GMT Wellyboot
Re: Several thoughts
It's not PC BS, British Army officer promotions and awards have been published in the London Gazette* since the mid 17th C. Publishing NCO promotions is just more of the same.
The problem here is linking current operational postings to all the other details and not filtering out the UKSF.
*Along with a wide array of other information, it was 'the' official UK publication pre internet, and even now it's still very useful.
-
-
-
Wednesday 2nd June 2021 16:12 GMT Yet Another Anonymous coward
Re: Issue new service numbers?
I'm assuming that because of German Tank Problem you wouldn't give troops sequential numbers
So you could issue all soldiers with multiple serial numbers to confuse a statistically advanced enemy.
-
-
Wednesday 2nd June 2021 23:24 GMT Anonymous Coward
At least it was sorted in the right order this time!
https://www.theregister.com/2020/08/07/army_promotion_excel_snafu/
-
Thursday 3rd June 2021 02:07 GMT Grey_Kiwi
Quite apart from the Special Forces issue, I'd be quite worried about the specialisations being displayed.
Knowing that SGT Smith is, e.g., a Networks specialist working in a formation of interest would probably make her or him of considerable interest to certain Foreign Intelligence Services, either immediately or at least work keeping an eye on to see where they go next.
This is both an OPSEC and an INFOSEC breach of pretty monumental proportions.
-
Thursday 3rd June 2021 07:02 GMT Richard 12
Wrong priorities there
“The leak of this information to media outlets is being investigated by the MoD and it would be inappropriate to comment further at this time.”
So if it had only gone to foreign agents who wish to do harm to the UK, that would have been ok?
It's only worth investigating how the media found out that all this highly sensitive personal data has been handed to anyone interested?
-
-
-
Thursday 3rd June 2021 14:12 GMT Cynic_999
No, the most important details of the invasion were not known to many people until very close to the time - at which point the majority who knew were being held incommunicado until D-day. In addition, there was a lot of deliberate false information "leaked" so that should the real plans be leaked the enemy would hopefully not know what information to take seriously.
It's one thing to know that a large invasion will take place some time in the next 3 months, but quite another to know the exact time & place where it will happen.
-
Wednesday 9th June 2021 17:01 GMT EnviableOne
infact that actually happened the germans managed to get hold of the plans for D-Day, from a planner killed during exercises in preperation on the north devon coast (washed up in the bay of biscay) but rejected them as too complex, instead believing that the attack would come over the pais de calais
-
-
-
-
Friday 4th June 2021 07:43 GMT Aussie Doc
Wow
Firstly, I really hope that nobody from the SF and family suffer from this stupidity.
Secondly, "Usually we just allow anyone in the armed forces to look at very sensitive data regarding all personnel, with an Excel password, on the intranet".
Somebody actually said that and that's all right then??? Is that MILSPEAK for "your data is important to us..." etc etc
Finally, and this is really sarcy/Godwin's Law stuff but...
<Clears throat>
"Not the first time some Corporal stuffed up and caused us a few headaches."
<Now rolls eyes>
But, seriously, I hope nobody gets seriously hurt by this and I don't mean some Captain's feelings.