Re: Not me
Think of all the arguments you come across when it comes to testing/measures/vaccination and apply them to other fields.
When the pandemic started, all the just-a-flu people remarked that death is a fact of life.
So, no recalls for faulty cars that kill its drivers, since death is a part of life?
When wide-spread testing was mulled, people argued that a test is just a single data point in time.
So, no more breathalyzer tests searching for drunk drivers, since it is only a snaphot.
When wide-spread testing was mulled, people argued against mandatory tests.
So, no more breathalyzer tests, since they are evil mandatory ones.
In my country, refusing a breathalyzer test gets you into the books with an assume 1.4 promille alcohol.
Guess what, being tested positive for Corona has mild implications compared to a driving under the influence.
When vaccinations were mulled, people argued against using allegedly unproven technology on the public.
So, no more "self-driving" cars. In contrast to vaccinations, the "self-driving" has killed people.
I find what has been going on during the pandemic is more than just pragmatism.
Disregarding quarantine, calling a mask-wearing mandate tyranny, etc. goes way beyond anything that I have considered acceptable prior to the pandemic.
Politicians arguing agains lock-downs, citing death being a part of life, are in my eyes bare of empathy.