back to article Myanmar orders blocks of Twitter and Instagram on top of Facebook ban

Myanmar’s military junta has ordered fresh blocks on the internet. Last Friday mobile carrier Telenor notified customers that “All mobile operators, international gateways and internet service providers in Myanmar received a directive on 5 February 2021 from the Myanmar Ministry of Transport and Communications (MoTC) to, until …

  1. Winkypop Silver badge
    Alert

    Nature abhors a vacuum

    All dictators will fall.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Joke

      Re: Nature abhors a vacuum

      "All dictators will fall."

      Biden is still in office.

      How many EOs signed in the first week? 6X more than any other POTUS. A new record.

      1. sabroni Silver badge

        Re: Biden is still in office.

        He won that election!! By a lot!!

        (7 million according to the results, unless you discount all the black votes. I mean unless you discount the illegitimate votes!! Sorry, was my white supremacy showing?)

      2. DS999 Silver badge
        Mushroom

        Re: Nature abhors a vacuum

        No Biden is in office because the wanna-be dictator's coup failed on Jan. 6th because in America you don't get the military to support a coup. Though apparently you do get some former military and current and ex cops who don't understand the Constitution, along with some rando militia members, nutjob conspiracy theorists, and some white supremacists sprinkled in to really make it the loser event of 2021.

        Fortunately by supporting it, el Trumpo will never hold office again even though cowardly republicans won't impeach him. That shitshow is how Trump will be remembered, as the worst president in US history and (hopefully) the only one to ever attempt a coup against his own government.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Boffin

          @DS99 Re: Nature abhors a vacuum

          I think you should pay attention to the impeachment trial being held in the Senate this week.

          You'll start to see that your assumptions are wrong and that you need to see the evidence before rushing to judgement.

          The charges raised by the FBI against those who breached the Capitol Building tell a different story.

          I also suggest you read Jonathan Turley's law blog. He has some choice things to say.

          (He and Dershowitz are both openly liberal Democrats who seem to come to Trump's defense on these types of things.

          1. DS999 Silver badge

            Re: @DS99 Nature abhors a vacuum

            There are plenty of conservative law professors (and the founder of the Heritage Foundation itself!) who say it is absolutely constitutional. You need to get out of your right wing media bubble.

    2. Potemkine! Silver badge

      Re: Nature abhors a vacuum

      Unless supported by China. Myanmar, NK and China itself are good examples.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    If $Dictator doesn't censor you

    Then $Platform will, unless it's inconsistent with their economic advantage $$$.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: inconsistent with their economic advantage

      Oh no! Capitalism!!

      I suppose you think the state should run Twitter....

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Boffin

        @AC Re: inconsistent with their economic advantage

        "

        Oh no! Capitalism!!

        I suppose you think the state should run Twitter....

        "

        -=-

        Actually making FB and Twitter public utilities would have a chilling effect. Or having the courts rule them as monopolies... would also have a chilling effect.

        It would actually solve a lot of problems and would also remove their Section 230 protections. (While affording them some other protections in its place.) But still not something FB or Twitter shareholders would want....

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    How can we get one of those directives?

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Thumb Up

    FB , Twitter banned?

    Wow, I wonder how they feel to be censored?

    Just saying.

    1. sabroni Silver badge

      Re: FB , Twitter banned?

      If only your coup had a been a little less shit, eh? Your fucking "leader" couldn't organise a coup while he was still in power.

      You're right to look to Myanmar as an example of where you want to be.

      Keep pretending it was stolen from you, democracy is overrated, you won't miss it when it's gone.

      Just sayin'

  5. Lon24 Silver badge

    Post modern social media

    So Facebook/Instagram/Twitter are dead? How else is one going to communicate?

    Oh, go out and meet face to face - or barricade to barricade? Keyboard warriors have to become real warriors. Burma's security forces appear to be finding that they are more difficult to deal with then suppressing tweets from 'Disgusted of Rangoon'. It's becoming daily apparent that there are more ways to organise a protest and subvert the government than being an online influenza.

  6. Anonymous Coward
    Black Helicopters

    SOP nothing new here.

    Shutting down and controlling communications is Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for any coup.

    People here need to actually take a bit of a history lesson.

    Just look at Egypt when the military ousted Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood from power.

    I just have to wonder what is being taught to kids these days.

    If judging by my nephew who went to Uni in Scotland... I think too many have a warped education.

    Sorry but those who don't learn their history are doomed to repeat their mistakes.

    1. Alan Brown Silver badge

      Re: SOP nothing new here.

      I've spent time living in Myanmar.

      The rich have satelilte ISP links via Thai ISPs.

      Everyone else puts up with absolutely shitty connectivity via several levels of CGNAT that makes most websites barely usable. This won't make much overall difference as things are heavilly throttled/firewalled via Naypyiadaw before the rest of the country gets to see it - and unfortunately whilst those of us in the west were hoping for another Nelson Mandela, what Myanmar has got (even before the coup) is more like another Robert Mugabe.

      There's a lot of stuff going on that is carefully hidden from western eyes and that all sides of government really DON'T like people outside the country findng out (particularly in Shan state, Karen tribal zones and in Rakine State) which the general populations finds "OK"

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like

  • DMCA can't be used to sidestep First Amendment, court rules
    Anonymous speech protections apply online too, and copyright can't diminish that

    It's been a good week for free speech advocates as a judge ruled that copyright law cannot be used to circumvent First Amendment anonymity protections.

    The decision from the US District Court for the Northern District of California overturns a previous ruling that compelled Twitter to unmask an anonymous user accused of violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). 

    The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which filed a joint amicus brief with the ACLU in support of Twitter's position, said the ruling confirms "that copyright holders issuing subpoenas under the DMCA must still meet the Constitution's test before identifying anonymous speakers." 

    Continue reading
  • SpaceX staff condemn Musk's behavior in open letter
    Well, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see why

    A group of employees at SpaceX wrote an open letter to COO and president Gwynne Shotwell denouncing owner Elon Musk's public behavior and calling for the rocket company to "swiftly and explicitly separate itself" from his personal brand.

    The letter, which was acquired through anonymous SpaceX sources, calls Musk's recent behavior in the public sphere a source of distraction and embarrassment. Musk's tweets, the writers argue, are de facto company statements because "Elon is seen as the face of SpaceX."

    Musk's freewheeling tweets have landed him in hot water on multiple occasions – one incident even leaving him unable to tweet about Tesla without a lawyer's review and approval. 

    Continue reading
  • GPUs aren’t always your best bet, Twitter ML tests suggest
    Graphcore processor outperforms Nvidia rival in team's experiments

    GPUs are a powerful tool for machine-learning workloads, though they’re not necessarily the right tool for every AI job, according to Michael Bronstein, Twitter’s head of graph learning research.

    His team recently showed Graphcore’s AI hardware offered an “order of magnitude speedup when comparing a single IPU processor to an Nvidia A100 GPU,” in temporal graph network (TGN) models.

    “The choice of hardware for implementing Graph ML models is a crucial, yet often overlooked problem,” reads a joint article penned by Bronstein with Emanuele Rossi, an ML researcher at Twitter, and Daniel Justus, a researcher at Graphcore.

    Continue reading
  • Musk repeats threat to end $46.5bn Twitter deal – with lawyers, not just tweets
    Right as Texas AG sticks his oar in

    Elon Musk is prepared to terminate his takeover of Twitter, reiterating his claim that the social media biz is covering up the number of spam and fake bot accounts on the site, lawyers representing the Tesla CEO said on Monday.

    Musk offered to acquire Twitter for $54.20 per share in an all-cash deal worth over $44 billion in April. Twitter's board members resisted his attempt to take the company private but eventually accepted the deal. Musk then sold $8.4 billion worth of his Tesla shares, secured another $7.14 billion from investors to try and collect the $21 billion he promised to front himself. Tesla's stock price has been falling since this saga began while Twitter shares gained and then tailed downward.

    Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others promised to loan the remaining $25.5 billion from via debt financing. The takeover appeared imminent as rumors swirled over how Musk wanted to make Twitter profitable and take it public again in a future IPO. But the tech billionaire got cold feet and started backing away from the deal last month, claiming it couldn't go forward unless Twitter proved fake accounts make up less than five per cent of all users – a stat Twitter claimed and Musk believes is higher.

    Continue reading
  • Twitter shareholders to vote on Elon Musk's acquisition
    Mogul's team sprayed with 'firehose' of data as unending saga continues

    Twitter has reportedly thrown its $44 billion buyout by Elon Musk to a shareholder vote, which could take place around late July or early August.

    Execs told employees of the plans on Wednesday, according to outlets including CNBC and the Financial Times.

    The move follows reiterations by Musk's camp that he is prepared to walk away from the deal if the social media network fails to provide accurate information on the number of fake accounts.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading
  • Twitter founder Dorsey beats hasty retweet from the board
    As shareholders sue the social network amid Elon Musk's takeover scramble

    Twitter has officially entered the post-Dorsey age: its founder and two-time CEO's board term expired Wednesday, marking the first time the social media company hasn't had him around in some capacity.

    Jack Dorsey announced his resignation as Twitter chief exec in November 2021, and passed the baton to Parag Agrawal while remaining on the board. Now that board term has ended, and Dorsey has stepped down as expected. Agrawal has taken Dorsey's board seat; Salesforce co-CEO Bret Taylor has assumed the role of Twitter's board chair. 

    In his resignation announcement, Dorsey – who co-founded and is CEO of Block (formerly Square) – said having founders leading the companies they created can be severely limiting for an organization and can serve as a single point of failure. "I believe it's critical a company can stand on its own, free of its founder's influence or direction," Dorsey said. He didn't respond to a request for further comment today. 

    Continue reading
  • Elon Musk needs more cash for Twitter buy after Tesla margin loan lapses
    Entrepreneur now looking at $33.5b bill if he wants to complete $44b purchase

    Elon Musk must personally secure $33.5 billion to fund his $44 billion Twitter purchase after allowing a $12.5 billion margin loan against Tesla stock to expire.

    Regulatory filings released Wednesday show the Tesla and SpaceX boss agreeing to secure "an additional $6.25 billion in equity financing" on top of the original $27.3 billion.

    The Tesla boss's Twitter purchase originally relied on $21bn of equity that he had to provide along with $12.5bn in margin loans secured by his Tesla stock. That margin loan was dropped to $6.25bn on May 5, and this additional financing would eliminate it altogether.

    Continue reading
  • Elon Musk says Twitter buy 'cannot move forward' until spam stats spat settled
    A stunning surprise to no one in this Solar System

    Elon Musk said his bid to acquire and privatize Twitter "cannot move forward" until the social network proves its claim that fake bot accounts make up less than five per cent of all users.

    The world's richest meme lord formally launched efforts to take over Twitter last month after buying a 9.2 per cent stake in the biz. He declined an offer to join the board of directors, only to return asking if he could buy the social media platform outright at $54.20 per share. Twitter's board resisted Musk's plans at first, installing a "poison pill" to hamper a hostile takeover before accepting the deal, worth over $44 billion.

    But then it appears Musk spotted something in Twitter's latest filing to America's financial watchdog, the SEC. The paperwork asserted that "fewer than five percent" of Twitter's monetizable daily active users (mDAUs) in the first quarter of 2022 were fake or spammer accounts, which Musk objected to: he felt that figure should be a lot higher. He had earlier proclaimed that ridding Twitter of spam bots was a priority for him, post-takeover.

    Continue reading
  • Elon Musk 'violated' Twitter NDA over bot-check sample size
    <5% figure was based on 100 accounts, if you're wondering

    Updated Last week Elon Musk hit pause on his Twitter acquisition over the platform's "less than 5 percent" bot figure.

    The Register asked the microblogging website how it made the estimate and was stonewalled, but in ensuing discussions over the weekend, Musk blurted out that the sample size was 100 accounts.

    One Musk fan asked how the userbase might help uncover the "real percentage" of fake accounts and was told:

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022