* Does not apply to non-EU countries
whose inmates are Subjects of a Norman Yoke.
Europe has had enough of the blurring between work and personal time – where your boss calls you in the evening or colleagues email at the weekend – and is mulling introducing legislation that would provide a “right to disconnect.” The European Parliament's Employment and Social Affairs Committee adopted a report this week …
Nor in the "Land of the Free". My husband (part-time, semiretired) got a 7am call just today from his boss, Since his boss is both partially deaf and a loud talker, I got the benefit of the conversation about why he (my husband) was not on the "call list" for customers experiencing a problem with their software product.
Been on call for the past eleven years. First as there was no one else, and when there finally was someone I had to train him. Took ages to bring someone up from scratch. Yes, sins committed by me and only I knew about were part of the problem. Left the company last year, and all out of sudden the tendovaginitis disappeard and I lost 15kg.
Lads, don't go there, have a rest. And a life.
Yes. Well said.
In my past life I worked as a scientist, which is in fact to live as a scientist, which means that this is what defines you entirely. Every minute you think about your job, which is something you really enjoy, are enthusiastic about, and in fact is what you are, not just a job.
You work at night.
You work on weekends.
You think about the next big project when on holidays
- and finish writing the bloody paper while on holidays.
I did love my job, some of the best years of my life, met lots of interesting, intelligent people all around the world, from many different countries. There were downsides, ooh yes, and I began to feel them.
From a health perspective my current job, dull as it may be at times, is much better. I disconnect outside office hours (a select few have private contacts, but those are friends, who would not abuse this for work). And now I know how much I have abused myself in the past. Never going to happen again.
Same here. I was on the MD's "break glass in case of emergency" list. I took satisfaction from being first in and last out. I loved my first Blackberry because I could respond to emails and have a crap at the same time. I was bloody good at my job and I loved it.
Then I retired and, hopefully not too late, realized what a twat and a mug I was. Now? - my health's better, I sleep better, no more heartburn and my eczema's gone.
What a twat I was.
I've been doing the same for around the last 15 years, I do get paid, quite well paid , for it though. It's simply become part of my working life.
There are four of us in the same boat, you can be sure that any of the four will answer a call immediately, or respond to an email with the half hour, regardless of the day of week...
I am on holiday at the moment, and I have just finished doing my emails for the morning and resolved a small SQL problem. It ony took 30 mins or so , so not a major problem ( whilst waiting for the wife to get out of bed)...
Some days it annoys me but most of the time I just take it in my stride.. Salary does make a huge difference though, if I was running on an entry level it would out of the question..
I know of a former colleague who like many had a company BlackBerry. She announced one day in an email that she was turning it off at 17:45 every weekday and at weekends.
Boss responded by email (reply all) saying if she didn't want to be contactable out of office hours that was fine with him. He also reminding her that she'd only been given the BlackBerry so people could contact her away from the office.
She was part of an "on call team" and paid extra to be so. He'd therefore be reducing her salary and having the BlackBerry back.
She opted to stay available out of hours after realising how much she'd be out of pocket.
The thing is, though, that's a fair response for when she is actually meant to be on call. But that shouldn't be 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
I had a role as a principal architect. I was the go-to for the people reporting into me, the directors above, the sales staff alongside me and customers.
I'd be getting calls at 2am sometimes when something went wrong.
I did the maths and worked out what a piss-poor hourly rate it translated to because whenever I brought the topic up, I was told some bullshit about a blended salary yada yada yada.
Genuinely when I put the figures for utilisatioon into the company spreadsheet (we had to be able to justify new hires so this was standard) I was actually coming in at somewhere not much North of minimum wage.
I therefore decided to do my homework some more. I went and checked out the market and to add insult to injury I was underpaid for an architect role, let alone principal.
So armed with all the details - copies of the jobs listings and my utilisation etc, I sat down with my boss to discuss. And got told there was no money for any kind of raise.
I left three months earlier and went back to my unwritten rule of work is for work.
For the last decade I've always made it clear. Contacting me out of normal hours is the exception. Overtime is the exception and is paid for. I am contracted to work 37.5/40 hours a week (whichever it is) and ok, if I am working away then I don't mind doing extra hours Mon-Thurs but that's on the understanding that I am out of there on a Friday morning.
I still get random calls at 9pm or later. They don't get answered. If it's urgent they'll leave a VM but surprise, surprise, it's rarely that urgent that they don't leave one and just move onto someone that does answer.
My holidays. My family time. My weekends. They are mine.
Years back (at a .govt.nz) on-call was a 'gentleman's agreement' with the business... then one particular business group wanted a formal contract (something to do with an FTP process they wanted nursing - it was very specific). I agreed to be part of a roster of 3 (I think)... it was money for nothing - the FTP process normally ran at about 3pm, so it wasn't going to be an A/H problem. Also, the extra kiwi pesos in my payslip weren't insignificant.
The process was to cut the helldesk phone over to a mobile... no IVR, so users didn't know they were going thru to a cellphone. You'd get the odd user ringing thru saying something like "oh I didn't expect someone to answer - I've forgotten my password"... and my response was "Sorry, I will log a ticket for you and someone will look at for you in the morning" (this is exactly what the on-call variation/contract said).
I would get the occasional one saying "oh, the other guy last week helped me" (and I would die a little inside, but re-state my position, expanding on what the on-call arrangements were, ie, they weren't paying for after hours/on-call support, so they would have to wait until the next business day - mostly the users were understanding, eg I've just got back in the country and I didn't even know what the time was, oh well, suppose I should sleep - yes, yes you should :rolleyes:)
But then one day we had a very specialised (and temporary) (read self-important) business group needing to get a report out ... they rang through after hours to me with some kind of problem - can't remember what it was - printer wasn't working, maybe... how the holy fuck I was supposed to fix that remotely, I don't know. Gave them my usual spiel and they said "oh [Desktop Manager] said there was someone on call to help us"..... hmmmm... news to me, so I told them so, and they said they were going to ring [DM]... ok, fine, she's not technically in my chain of command, so she can't tell me what to do. 1/2 an hour later [DM] is ringing me, and I bluntly said "At what point did you think it might be a polite thing to do and give the oncall person, me, a heads up that this business group needed help?"
She was a shite manager and spouted some bollocks about this group's report was needing to go to the PM's office. I said something about 'lack of planning on their part doesn't make an emergency on mine". The stupid thing was if she had just given me the heads up I probably would have helped if I could (grudgingly). But because of her lack of common courtesy, I dug my toes in and quoted the on-call contract I had signed. She threatened to go to her boss (who was my boss' boss)... I told her go for it and when my on-call rotating was finished that week I was resigning from it... leaving them only two people on the roster.
I can't remember what the outcome was that night, but I kept my word and resigned from on-call, and while I missed the money, it was so good not to have to worry about that damn phone. Even though it was 1 week in 3, it was still a PITA - couldn't go away, couldn't go to the pub, couldn't go to the pictures.....
Fast forward a few years and they tried to bring 'proper' on-call.... for the whole department, not just that one business group. The remuneration was calculated a slightly different way, but when you applied the numbers, it worked out to be about 60% of the original agreement (so you want to pay me less for supporting more?)
I refused to sign the contract variation.... I had several 'conversations' with senior management & HR, but by this stage I was unioned up, and I would copy my delegate into every conversation. and I would relay the above and the union rep would say "he kinda has a point"
These days I'm at an IT outsourcer in a specialised role operating "in the cloud" (whoooo).... so no on-call (business support hours only, and even then 99.99% outages are ground-to-cloud connectivity related, so don't talk to me, talk to network support)
Ahhhh... these forums are a bit like therapy! Icon cos I feel like I need some stress relief now.
"Genuinely when I put the figures for utilisatioon into the company spreadsheet (we had to be able to justify new hires so this was standard) I was actually coming in at somewhere not much North of minimum wage."
I worked a short time for a friends IT consulting company. (mistake, never work for a friend) I was paid well but he had this notion that everyone should work 100 hours/week. He would say, "I work 100 hours a week!" I had to explain it to him that as a principal owner of the company that when he works 100 hours a week on billable time he makes more money, when I work 100 hours a week I make less money. It was a concept he had a hard time grasping.
I left soon after that. There were some hard feelings but now we are still friend.
Yep. Me too.
Although I am glad that my current employer has a different attitude. I get a company phone and I am supposed to turn it off / leave it in the office, when I am not working. I generally tend to turn it to mute and stick it in my work backpack and just leave it there when I leave work, or at the moment in home office, I leave it on mute in my office in the cellar, when I stop for the day.
And overtime has to be taken as time off in lieu as quickly as possible.
The last 2 places were similar. Any weekend work was planned in advance (E.g. server maintenance that couldn't be done during office hours) and was minimal - 2 or 3 times a year.
But before that, the place was horrible. Long hours and last minute call outs. I had the CEO turn up at my desk at 16:30 and say, "I need 50 slides for a presentation at CeBIT at 09:00 tomorrow morning."
And calls from customers at 01:00 through 04:00 weren't uncommon either - we sold software for meat processing plants and the slaughter lines usually started just after midnight.
@"CEO turn up at my desk at 16:30 and say......", classic bad management the correct answer is "sorry I have to leave on time I have a thing".
Brownie points for keeping bad management in place depreciate faster than GBP and in my experience there is no downside to being firm. I used to running around fixing everything and chances awere that this is some other person they lean upon demanding their pound of flesh and management are robbing Peter to pay Paul.
If you are known not to put their fkups first then they don't even ask you in the end and you still get paid and treated just the same since they can't complain about you without revealing their own failures.
If it's in your contract, you're being appropriate informed and compensated, right? Or do you just sign any new additions to your contract?
"On call" does not mean "work for free". It means that you are the guy who will make themselves available when it's necessary to do so. Not that you'll work unpaid.
For non hourly staff, how many get compensated for this though?
Some have specific hours on all (not 24/7) which they get a stipend, then hourly rate after that.
I do feel that we should have automatic overtime at more than 1x these days over 40 hours. With *no* opt out allowed.
In some part, I don't think its just the company that is the problem, its the staff. The company obviously turns a blind eye to it, provide phones, laptops because they think it will gain them free hours. I have straight up been told its a "win win" to provide laptops to people. No one that we have done this for has any kind of on-call agreement or hourly rate. Some of us have no OT clauses too.
A few years ago I saw another management level employee on linkedin comment on another's photo which had laptops in docks on desks out of hours . They said "Its a bug bear of mine seeing laptops left in the docks at work". Could be seen as "this is why we should use PCs" but from the discussion it was obvious that was not the case. I'm glad to see that some others were commenting on the shittiness of his situation.
Reminds me of the Microsoft poster about working whilst sat on the toilet, or in bed in the evening.
> Or do you just sign any new additions to your contract?
You get something to sign? Luxury!
Today (hence the anon) I've just had a reminder that apparently I'm now obliged to inform my employer about *anything* that could be construed as a conflict of interest, particularly other employments. This, apparently, is a contractual change, but I've not been asked to sign anything (nor send some sort of confirmatory email in lieu).
Promotions  also result in a new set of contractual terms. Not necessarily bad, but you bust a gut trying to impress enough to get a promotion and only then do you get to see the new contract. At which point accepting is hardly a free choice.
 Beyond a certain grade - but easily within the range of a techie moving up to a more senior consultant type role.
I agree, I'm senior tech in a specialised field and have been on call for the last 8 years, 24x7x365.25; I'm in the middle of an extra-special on-call where I have to be at my desk within 5 minutes of a call for a customer activation. Total remuneration for this? Zero.
So not just an hour minimum per call, but also a minimum payment for on-call hours.
Whether a few minutes are an issue depends on when and what you're doing. If I was asleep, even a 15 second question would be very disruptive - I'm not the type who can easily get back to sleep once I've awakened enough to answer a technical question. If I'm out with friends or on vacation, it would be quite disruptive.
However, if I'm just flopped on the couch watching TV or posting on The Register a call much longer than a few minutes might not be disruptive. Heck, in some cases it might even be welcome!
I doubt it, he understands the importance of equilibrium between work and family life. If he didn't, he wouldn't be my boss.
I practised the 60 hour-long week in my young age for years, getting quite nothing in return. Surprisingly, now that I restricted myself to the legal working hours, my efficiency and my productivity greatly improved, as did my relation with coworkers. "A happy worker is a productive worker"
Whenever I've been looking for a new role in the past and therefore actually answering the numerous emails I receive from scalpers, "what is the on-call expectation for this role?" is one of the first questions in my reply.
Assuming that the scalper comes back with "none/minimal" and I then go to interview, when we get to the "do you have any questions?" bit, I always follow up with something like "the scalper said you have minimal on-call requirements - can you tell me how often someone in my role is expected to be on call and how often issues have come up?"
So far, the three times I have been asked to work outside of office hours in my 20+ year career have all been paid back by extra holiday...
If it's anything like the working time directive they'd have us all sign waivers anyway*. Not that I suppose this matters in the sunlit uplands of the UK...
(*This was way back when, shortly after the WTD was introduced. I did initially refuse but it was pointed out that it would be career limiting to do so ... I left soon after, but still.)
In the last place I worked, I noted that our new contract (which we all had to sign) automatically included an opt-out from the WTD. I pointed out that this should not be A Thing and people should have to choose to opt out. Their solution? To offer an opt-out to the opt-out for those who wanted to opt out of opting out. At least half the company signed it. HR didn't like me after that. Now I work for myself.
Thankfully, my chosen line of work (technical/academic editing) means if it's sunny when I look out of the window in the morning, I can often say, "f#ck working, I'm going for a walk in the Peaks". The more work I do, the more money I get, and I can largely choose how to balance that. Plus, I've established that napping after lunch is almost always a good idea.
Business secretary Kwasi Kwarteng has confirmed his department launched a review into EU workers’ protections post-Brexit, but insisted there will not be a “bonfire of rights”.
Nor did he say that there wouldn't be a "slow burn" of workers rights either.
Update: It would appear the minister has changed his mind (for now).
Review of UK workers' rights post-Brexit is axed in sudden U-turn
Only last week, new business secretary Kwasi Kwarteng confirmed consultation was going ahead
We have the "WTD opt-out force push" at work too - here they frame it as "You can sign this, or you can account for every 15 minutes of your working day".
Part of the problem I have as a software developer is that I actually really enjoy software development and problem solving. When I'm really into a problem I'll happily work 16+ hour days, and I'd rather write unit tests than watch Netflix, talk to people or make dinner. Even if I'm doing those things, I'm still thinking about the problems I'm working on and coming up with plans.
This isn't conducive to a happy and functioning relationship, so most nights I force myself to stop by about 7 PM, make dinner and socialise, but she knows sometimes I'd rather be working away. When she goes to bed, I'm usually back online for another couple of hours.
I know this isn't universal - I know plenty of people for whom it is a job, they work their hours, and when their day finishes they are totally happy to switch off and stop thinking about it. Probably healthier that way...
Also make sure it accounts for the time you were accounting for your time.
We put a category on the timesheet software at one place that said "Filling time sheet". Everyone did it roughly on a Friday and it usually took that long.
Company was happy enough to have rough estimates throughout the week, they felt it was better than none so wasn't the end of the world.
(For companies that actually charge to projects and clients this is obviously important in its own right)
Ah, yes, but you are one of the few people who actually love their jobs and derive no small amount of intellectual satisfaction from it. Not everyone is that fortunate.
But what is going to happen when you retire or when you are no longer able to do what you currently do? Will you be at your wit's end and ultimately curl up and die or will you be glad it's all over and go on to perform other fulfilling non-job-related activities?
FTR: I am freelance and thoroughly enjoy what I do precisely because it is so intellectually satisfying. However, I live alone, so I don't have the "problem" of having to accommodate a partner. I fully intend working on in my retirement because I love my job and I don't know what else I'd do with my time. I am not alone in this.
Tom 38: "You can sign this, or you can account for every 15 minutes of your working day"
Strangely, when I had a vacation job at British Aerospace (Aircraft) in Hatfield, our timesheets contained a code for filling out the timesheet, and we were expected to spend 15 minutes each week doing so.
I dont know what the job was but I'd imagine if you could fill in the time sheet in 15 minutes then it wasn't worth itemising. I remember filling in a wedge of time for researching how to fill in a time sheet. After all they wouldnt want the customer to sue for me falsifying time sheets.
I had to state which projects I'd worked on and for which manager. It wasn't difficult, but they needed the timesheet to account for everything, but I did find things confusing come payday.
The day before I left that job, I asked the finance people "why are you paying me so much?"
The answer surprised me:
Firstly, I was expect to work a 37 hour week, but it was assumed that as I had worked a 37 hour week, I would have worked a 40 hour week, had I been asked to, so they paid me for 40 hours per week.
Secondly, I got a bonus for working every day of a month.
Thirdly, although I turned 18 in the middle of my employment, they couldn't be bothered with the paperwork to change my rates after only a few weeks of work, so they had paid me as if I were 18 all the time.
The first two 'extras' were described on my payslip as 'tax adjustments'.
This from a company that had paid a lot of people to do nothing during a Labour government, as there were no planes to make, but under Harold Wilson they couldn't sack anyone or make them redundant. So when they got some work, the workforce demanded (and got) a pay rise as now they actually had to do some work.
I am not a fan of Mrs Thatcher or Mr Tebbit, but even I have to admit they did have a bit of a point in some cases.
The waiver shouldn't be needed - it should be a fixed amount of recompense over the normal rate over the set hours (as per waiver).
Sure some companies will try to suggest "effective" salary, but it goes a long way towards proper compensation for work done.
And maybe a few more jobs for others.
Are they the hours in the main building or are they the hours where you are sitting? Suppose you are doing technical support and they send you to Australia or elsewhere to install a system for a customer ... and if you run into any problems during the installation will nobody be at the home office to talk to?
If the company needs to provide support outside normal office hours then it should pay people to do it, not assume you can call them outside their working hours. So, in the example you quote then the company should have someone either in the office or at least on-call for a shift which covers Aus working time.
I've always had a simple agreement with my bosses (who were usually in a very different timezone). If they needed me out of hours, they can call or email me. If I don't want to be called I turn my phone off or ignore the message. I'd usually much rather spend 10 minutes sorting out an issue than come in to work the next day to find a festering pile of email conversations which have to be individually cleaned up, but the choice is mine. I wouldn't work somewhere where I needed a law to protect me from my boss.
The problem is not everybody is the position to decide when to answer or not. I too can ignore calls late in the day or in weekends, without any issue. Other people are not so lucky and do need a law to protect them.
I've always gone to lengths to ensure that most people at work did not have my mobile number. It was only given to my line manager (who required it as a point of contact), the Director of IT, and one or two colleagues, all of whom I trusted not to abuse it. All of whom were also made aware of that reasoning. By and large, they didn't abuse it.
Then Covid and mass working-from-home happened. My phone number was included in a Whatsapp group, and suddenly I was getting messages from the Head of Marketing and Head of HR. The former came to me in a flap, asked for a super-urgent update to the company website and gave some justification that made sense on the face of it. I dropped what I was doing, did the work, then went and did some digging on the reasoning behind it. There was none (A 20% impact on our sales, quoted by HoM, turned into less than 5% impact on traffic and less than 1% impact on sales for less than 8 hours overnight. Statistically, 0% impact). The Head of HR wanted me to add a job vacancy to the website on a weekend. She was pointedly ignored, then told to keep that kind of thing to work hours the following week.
If it's an emergency, I've made it known I will be available. If it's not, then I'm not.
It's a benefit for the company not you, Since it only covers non-emergency stuff it's for the sot of things that would take the NHS ages to deal with in otherwise healthy staff,
You're getting it so they don't have you below 100% at work for weeks/months when a bit of physio or some minor surgery can fix you up this weekend - think of it as a maintenance contract
Yep, I've had similar issues during the new WFH period. People calling me on my mobile about an *urgent* issue and being absolutely rude with it too. So I was rude back to them. I reported the conversation to the MD in case of a HR backlash and he said "I don't blame you. I'll speak to them." No more work calls on my mobile and I can just review Teams messages when I have the time.
Didn't call, but did message my personal phone rather than use work email. The message was ignored completely, and when I got into work the following Monday there was an email waiting for me. Dated that morning.
I say the message was ignored, I did advise a colleague who also had the ability to edit the website to likewise ignore any similar message he might get.
Many years ago I worked allegedly standard hours as a support technician for a group which provided 24/7 gatekeeper service to manufacturing. I used to get called in fairly regularly but the group manager denied both payment or TOIL and and even refused recompense of my telephone rental (this was long before mobile telephony). The same manager never took an outside call to my knowledge, but his rental was paid.
Then I moved house, from ~2 miles from the factory to ~25 miles (and we sold our car as part of the financing). I spun the tale (credible in those days) that there was an issue which prevented me taking over the phone contract,. The inevitable crash took about three weeks: the group's set-up (not IT) went out of spec, test results were meaningless, and production shut down on the Saturday night.
Monday morning was interesting. I came out of it with an agreement for time-and-half payment (not TOIL) for call-ins on weekdays and double-time for Sundays (always including travel time), coverage of taxi fares both ways, and my phone rental fully paid. And the boss was moved-on about a year later.
The extra money did help us get on top of our new mortgage a bit quicker...
In the early years of my career I suffered a major stress-related collapse which took me almost three years to fully recover from. One of the first things I remember thinking when I woke up was 'nobody is doing that to me again'. Since then, work has simply been a means to provide money to do what I want. I walk out the office (or as it is now, close the laptop) and that's me gone until start-time tomorrow. Career? I decided I didn't want one after that. In the fifteen years I've had my current job my manager has called once out-of-hours and apologised profusely before asking the question. It took longer to listen to his apology than it did to answer the question.
As so many above have said: it ain't worth it.
"Career" is a con. It's a way of getting people to do more work than they are paid for in the hope of a non-defined goal somewhere in the future. However, much of the extra work is not what they should be doing - meetings, writing papers, updating policies, sucking-up to other careerists, going to endless conferences. All this at the expense of those who *want to do the actual work", but see the fucking wasters get rewarded for not doing the actual work.
I'm sure people will find ways around this, but it's important to at least send the message that attempting to get people to do work out-of-contract is *bad*. I've got friends who are frankly being abused this way. Meetings getting scheduled for 9 PM, getting flak for not answering emails on Sunday, that sort of crap. It has to stop. You want this kind of availability, then pay consultant rates.
My current and former Principals have as part of there email signature...
"I am sending this communication at a time that suits me. I understand that this may not be during standard working hours and do not expect that you answer until standard business hours." And they actually reply with a light slap on the wrist if you do respond out of hours
The boss was very apologetic when in the last week of the just concluded school holidays (NSW Australia) he sent out an all hands email with information on the new Wuflu restrictions at school.
When I have sent emails to colleagues who are on holiday etc, it was not to ask questions, but to let them know that some problem they were involved with while in the office has been resolved.
I do put in something along the lines that I don't expect a reply, but just that I thought that they would like to know, and not have to worry about it while they were out!
I've been "on call" 24/7/52+ for about 25 years, it's inevitable managing a very small department for a company based on 3 continents*.
However I choose whether to respond to an email or call and almost never answer the phone if it's ringing; this has never been an issue with my line management.
The additional stress of refusing to respond to an urgent call is far greater than actually dealing with it, when it's usually a simple problem**,
*Our NZ plant did have the decency to wait until about 06:00 UK time to call me a while back.
**Although it helps if management then listen. Many years back**** a previous employer called me on holiday to say there was an issue with the Unix box backup. I told them not to do anything but wait until I was back in the office. Instead they called in our parent company's PC support people, the engineer having no knowledge of Unix just switched off the box with no attempt at a controlled shutdown. Of course this also meant the backups were a few days out of date. It took about 5 days on my return to get everything up, configured and with as much data recovered as I could manage.
***So long ago the "mobile" was a car phone attached to a huge lead acid battery pack.
When I were a lad...1 (It is in fact more than half a lifetime ago.)
My first permanent & pensionable job included the work hours defined as Thirty seven and a half hours per week taking one week with another. 2 What was extra in one week could be balanced out the week after. A couple of hours this week for an external reason could be made up next week.
My then manager took me aside after a couple of months and explained, that if the job didn't broadly fit the hours defined in the contract then one of two things was wrong.
Either the role (including tasks and time) was badly defined.
Or the employee's approach to the role and the work as wrong 3
Figure out which it is and address it
Has stuck with me since - to the extent that when work mobiles became common place I'd power down the phone shortly after getting home. Out of hours was not categorically ruled out - but it is the exception not the rule and it involves a quid pro quo.
1Takes brief diversion for Monty Python sketch....
2Those of a certain age and/or background may recognise the phrase
3Including the possibility that they just didn't have the requisite skills
A company added an on call requirement. I agreed as long as it was paid back in overtime, three hours off for each hour worked - and each interruption an hour long. So, a one hour or five minute call, that's three hours off when it suits me. A one hour and five minute call, that's six hours off when suits me.
I wasn't married so didn't mind working outside hours but I deeply resented having to stay sober. ish.
I worked for a global group and the French and Belgian employees were a joke, the only times you could contact them was 10am to 11:30am, plus 2pm to 4pm. And good for them.
The EU has been hoist by it's own petard, calling a last minute evening meeting only to be snubbed.
Vaccine-maker AstraZeneca has refused to attend a meeting top EU officials scheduled for Wednesday evening amid an escalating dispute over production shortfalls, according to a Commission official.
> The title reads like a Brexit voter rant, not sure what this has to do with the current topic of EU protecting workers' rights for those still in the EU.
He was pointing out the irony of the EU proposing new workers' rights not to be disturbed with work outside of working hours while at the same time demanding that the AstraZeneca board take part in an evening meeting.
In other words a classic case of hypocrisy. Quite amusing actually. :-)
Your news are old, inaccurate news, apparently.
You should press F5 on your link, that now says:
"AstraZeneca says meeting with Commission, EU countries is still on "
Maybe they remembered that those vaccines are in fact made in factories inside very much sovereign EU countries?
It's "Your news is" not "Your news are".
Yes, apparently the EU press release was a lie and AZ always said they'd attend. You've mistaken the issue though. The EU were demanding that AZ diverted supplies from their British plant to supply the EU, due to a shortfall in the EU plants. AZ weren't trying to divert supplies from EU plants to the UK.
I'm a huge critic of the British government handling of the pandemic (Here are five ways the government could have avoided 100,000 Covid deaths) but in terms of advance booking of vaccines and roll-out the UK is far ahead of the EU.
I mean, it's kind of ironic that you haven't even approved the AZ vaccine yet.
Actually Prof. Sridhar has been a consistent and reliable voice of reason throughout the pandemic, and has been published and interviewed by media across the political spectrum.
My mid eighties parents got their first vaccine today, the AZ one, told the follow up would be two months from now. Neither the vaccine or the delay are ideal but better than nothing.
Boris is in town so we'd all prepared a diatribe in case we bumped into him or his circling media circus. Sadly he eluded us - indeed he eluded any member of the public. His mishandling of the covid crisis makes him the embodiment of the case for Scottish independence as the past 20 polls show.
Who is this Sir Keir you mention?
My mid-80s Mum had her first shot 2 weeks ago, my similarly aged Mum-in-law got her second one last week. Neither is in Scotland.
Who is this Sir Keir you mention?
Sir Keir Rodney Starmer KCB QC MP, current leader of the Labour party. Yes, Labour is led by a private-schooled knight of the realm, strange times.
Apparently we've been prioritising care homes over octogenarians, which takes longer but should prolong more life. What jab did your mum and mum in law get, and when are they getting a boost?
We have one Labour MP in Scotland, before Blair we were all Labour MPs. It's pretty much a defunct relic now, without a leader.
May election will be another SNP win, leading to a popular if illegal independence vote. It's high time to register TheRegister.Scot.
Back in forensic science days there was an occasional need for out of hours response to some major crime. My approach was that I'd not guarantee being on the end of a phone at any time (way before mobiles and we didn't have pagers either) but if I was then I'd come in unless it was impossible. It worked well enough.
Since January 2017, when you go home (company with more than 50 employees), you can turn the phone off and stop reading emails. If you're going to be called at 2am then you're supposed to be accordingly paid for being "on call" unless there are mitigating circumstances (example - here at work if the freezer fails, the temperature sensor gizmo will start calling a list of management types in a loop until it gets an affirmative response from somebody).
I work for a >0.5M employee company headquartered in Germany, and the Exchange servers are timelocked for most staff (except those at a *very* senior level) so that emails cannot be sent or received between 6pm and 7am on weekdays, and all weekend.
There are some breeds of boss that would have an IDGAF attitude about any laws like this.
I've mentioned on here before that I once had a boss who repeatedly called me when he knew I was at my grandfather's funeral.
Some people consider themselves above the law but I can see how this would be a good thing for more corporate environments.
If your phone is off or otherwise muted then you wouldn't know about the calls until after the funeral. There are ways to mitigate such things, and in the limit, a new job beckons if the boss is a chronic arsehole. It is said that a lot of people change jobs because of their boss.
My landline has an answering machine & I always let the call go to the recorder. If I decide I want to call you back then I will. If I don't feel like it, I won't. My cellphones have always had the ability to change a ring tone based on the caller, so I would change my work contact ringer to something easily identifiable. If I didn't feel like talking to work, they could leave a voicemail & I'd get back to them when I felt like it. Now with Caller ID for land lines & a cellphone able to announce the calling party, you can force it to go to recording without even needing to lift a finger (the one you're giving the caller in glee). Work calls & you didn't pick up? Sorry, I was in a no signal zone & didn't get the voicemail until much later.
Work sends an email out of hours? That's fine. I'm under no obligation to admit that I received it at any specific time. I don't have return receipts turned on, my Outlook is configured to ignore calendar events, & any meeting requests get sent to the trash. It's my personal account, I'm not required to answer work email. Now, if I'm already at work then it's a whole 'nother kettle o' fish, but if I'm not on the clock then I'm also not available.
Sure I might return the ocaisional call or reply to the odd email, but I don't make a habit of it. Why? Because I've never had an employer willing to pay me OT rates to deal with their "emergencies" out of normal hours.
I'm aware of others that don't have that luxury, I wish it were universal that off the clock meant "Bugger off", but until the day that utopia arrives, there are too many BOFH style excuses to use to explain why your phone didn't ring, the email didn't arrive, your reply didn't send, or your attempt to ring them back went nowhere.
"You tried to call me? Sorry, it must have been... (flipping through the BOFH excuse calendar) ...electromagnetic flux interference from solar flares causing signal degredation in the upper ionosphere. Oh, and Klingons off the starboard bow."
"electromagnetic flux interference from solar flares causing signal degredation in the upper ionosphere. Oh, and Klingons off the starboard bow."
Having chewed your way through the first sentence, I rather suspect their eyes will be so glazed over that you could say the second sentence with a completely straight face and they'd just nod.
In my last employment* I was having an email conversation with a senior manager about employment conditions and HR and stuff like that. The conversation ended when he told me I should not overwork, and that the employer has a duty of care towards its staff. He sent me that email at 4:15 on a Sunday afternoon.
Ever since I had a work mobile, I have turned it off just before leaving work, and turned it on just after arriving at the office (or setting off for the client's place of work). There are few things an employer can do more annoying than phoning up at 5 minutes before knocking off time for a 'brief' job that then takes 90 minutes to resolve.
*I am retired now. A 'gentleman of leisure', and the posts above indicate to me that I shall not be seeking a return to paid employment (or any other sort) any time soon. (Must disable that LinkedIn account some time too.)
"There are few things an employer can do more annoying than phoning up at 5 minutes before knocking off time..."
Ouch, I felt that one. That's the favourite tactic of one particular high-up at our place. On a Friday, usually. He also has a distressing habit of chronically under-estimating the amount of time a job will take to do.
You have my sympathies.
I did have a client who insisted on daily 'progress' conference calls, at 5.00pm Monday to Friday. Ironically, he did nothing other than attend and organise conference calls and meetings. I would tell him that he had to 'make a decision' go and speak to the end customer, tell the end customer important things (only stuff like 'If I don't tell you this we will be in breach of UK Security regulations and I'll have to tell the client's Departmental Security Officer', you know nothing 'serious').
Those calls lasted a full fortnight before there was pretty much a mutiny as his own team was not pleased at spending 5:00 to 6:00 on a Friday afternoon on a call.
The project only made progress when he left.
Oh, and one of my line managers wanted a weekly team meeting at 4:30 on a Friday afternoon each week. Pretty much the entire team responded that as we worked our bollocks off during the week, he would be the only attendee. (The week he proposed it, I had worked until 10:00pm on Tuesday and Thursday and was not inclined to be around on the Friday afternoon.)
I've been on 24/7 callout for decades. For the past few years, the estate was in such a mess I was easily doubling my salary. But it was bloody hard work and it just about wore me out.
The thing is, the PHBs knew. The usual platitudes were abound (you should rest, you need a break etc etc etc). But they'd be the first on the phone when the shit hit the fan. What was worse, the team had been cut to a point where there were not enough people (remember when teams were big enough to have a primary/secondary on call)?
You have to remember, the PHBs care less about you the higher up the chain they are.
The advantage of ignoring the house phone (that's what the answering machine is for) and carefully leaving the mobile I use for work by the bed on charge. It also has a nice Do Not Disturb feature which means it won't make a noise outside certain hours unless it's a call from one of a few people, none of whom are likely to call that phone anyway. The boss also has his own dedicated ring tone so I know immediately if it's him.
That's not to say I don't occasionally check in on work email during the evening, but then it's during the working day now and I'm posting here, so I figure that balances out.
Today I have worked my 17th day straight, including one "day" of 30 hours on the trot. Been on call all week, officially with compensation perks. However, de factor on call for the last 20 years.
So far this week 2/3rd of my department have been eliminated and I have my appointment tomorrow, along with the rest.
Great team, we covered each others arses and got shit done. No one star and plenty of grunt when needed.
Karma: It's the biggest sales period of the year and the tech supporting so much legacy business decisions is old and flaky. Only held up by best wishes and sweat. As from tomorrow, it will be held up by only good wishes outside of 9-5.
I have my timesheets for many, many years archived and will be quickly making a trip to the relevant authorities.
Posting Anon, obviously.
'Such a shame, boss, sir, but my broadband failed so I actually had to get some work done offline instead of playing, sorry surfing, sorry interacting, on the company intranet.
BTW, I solved that problem you gave me, here's the code, strangely easier to concentrate than when I'm frequently interrupted by pointless emails and phone calls.'
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021