Inconsistent decision is concerning
So they allowed Google to keep the models they developed after privacy rules were broken, but not this smaller company.
The Google decision set a precedent, so why make a different decision afterwards?
This decision creates an unfair playing field. Google benefits from both decisions and the smaller company can't compete with Google because of the decision.
Is it because Google is bigger?
For me it raises a larger concern about the integrity of the whole process, decision-making and penalties. Why did a larger and wealthy company get a more favourable decision?