Wondering if the compiler efficiencies for graphics drivers will trickle down to the older, but near-universal HD 620/630 graphics cores........
Intel talks up its 10nm Tiger Lake laptop system-on-chips as though everything is going according to plan
Intel has revealed details of its 11th Generation Core technology, including its Tiger Lake laptop-friendly system-on-chip family featuring Willow Cove CPU cores and so-called SuperFin 10nm transistors. Despite a delay in the chip maker's 7nm production plans after years of stalling with 10nm, credible competition from AMD, …
Thursday 13th August 2020 14:48 GMT Anonymous Coward
That press release in full...
"Other firms talk about 7nm. Pah! Here at Intel, the talking's done: we're one not 1nm, not 2nm, but, yes, 3nm better! Ladies and Gentleman, may I present the 3nm betterated Intel 10nm with 3nm extra in every chip! And not much data leakage either! And a hidden-for-your-benefit management subsystem with more back doors than the average whorehouse! Hey! Why are you all leaving!? Free pen, anyone?"
Thursday 13th August 2020 17:24 GMT Anonymous Coward
Friday 14th August 2020 00:06 GMT Rol
Re: That press release in full...
7nm allows interpolar mishtabbing and mashable burfing architecture, while 10nm is too big to get all of that on one die and you just end up with a mishmash instead.
I do agree it will be some years before 7nm becomes an industry standard, but that's Intel for you.
Hopefully Intel will catch up so we can be assured by the rightful guardians of industry standards that 7nm is in fact an industry standard.
I hope AMD don't do anything foolish in the meantime and start churning out 5nm chips, as I very much doubt Intel will ever get to the point that they can validate it as an industry standard.
Perhaps if customer's voted with their feet, then they might just dislodge Intel from being the arbiter of standards, and a new monarch might ascend, one that is kind, benevolent, far seeing and innovative, and not the twisted Richard we've had to suffer all these years. I bet Intel have more than a couple of missing princes in the tower to account for.
Friday 14th August 2020 04:12 GMT Schultz
7nm [... and '''] the rightful guardians of industry standards
Who cares about industry standards. My son got his first 'budget' laptop for school and it is now the most powerful computer in our house. Based on one of the new low-power 7 nm Ryzen chips. Impressive.
It's been a while since I upgraded any hardware ... prices just didn't come down and performance gains seemed very incremental. But maybe that was just Intel stagnating and we had to wait a few years for AMD to catch up.Let's see if Intel will get back into the action.
Thursday 13th August 2020 15:21 GMT RM Myers
The Problem with Briefings and Press Released
Everybody always says their new product is the best/fastest/most efficient/what ever other ill-defined term marketing comes up with and the lawyers think they can get away with. The reality is, you really won't know until unbiased sources can test and compare them.
However, I will give Intel credit - they may just have set a new record for buzzwords in one briefing. When I worked in a hospital lab, we used the abbreviation TNTC* for situations like this.
* Too numerous to count
Thursday 13th August 2020 15:38 GMT Charlie Clark
ML also ran?
While the architecture improvements do sound good: if you can drop the voltage you get more done with the same power draw, it's difficult to see the other stuff, particularly the ML stuff getting anyone very excited. People with big ML requirements can already choose from a range of established stacks from AMD, nVidia, Amazon, Google et al, with the Amazon offering showing the flexibility of the ARM architecture. And why are the alternatives around? Because Intel was too slow to listen to customer and see the potential.
But the company still has some great hardware and software engineers.
Thursday 13th August 2020 16:06 GMT Zola
"Layers a few Angstroms thick"
It all sounds very good, and nice to see Intel actually innovating again (now that they have to). However one can only hope that these new CPUs don't suffer the same fate as the Intel Atom C2000 SoC that died after a couple of years. The cautious may be advised to take a pass on this new unproven design.
Friday 14th August 2020 01:16 GMT Snake
Re: "Layers a few Angstroms thick"
So they are going [back] to multiple dies on a component - you know, the System/360 paradigm that also worked for Pentium Pro.
So what is old becomes new. Again.
The more serious question raised, through careful reading, is the proposed RAM-CPU stack with the RAM on top. And exactly how thermally efficient in shedding heat, without causing random bit errors in the now-heated RAM, will this proposed design be??
Call me naive but this doesn't sound like a good plan...
Thursday 13th August 2020 18:52 GMT Hubert Cumberdale
Friday 14th August 2020 01:36 GMT Ted's Toy
Please tell the marketing dept.
14 + means 14 plus something
so 10+ will be the next generation with the size or something increasing, Surely it should read 14- 14-- 14--- 14---- now 12nm so on to get to a smaller no. Using 10 plus means going the other way getting bigger. All the way back to 14nm
Friday 14th August 2020 10:47 GMT Chris the bean counter
With Intel its what they didnt say
No mention of yield and iirc performance of Icelake.
Althouugh it was an architecture day if 10nm yield had improved significantly they would have shouted from the rooftops with a % yield quoted.
They didn't so consider this vapourware.
Must be very frustrating for the brilliant engineers to produce great designs that may not be manufactured in quantity
Friday 14th August 2020 14:20 GMT Greg 38
20 metal layers!
If I counted the layers on their sketch correctly, there are like 20 metal layers on these chips. That's a boatload of deposition, polish, via litho and etch, metal litho and etch, ALD dep at lower metal layers, copper electroplate at higher metal layers and polish again. With each step introducing defects. Hats off to getting a manufacturable process.