Tick tock (not tik tok)
"How portable are the chips at moving to different fabs that use different processes? I don't know, but would suspect they are designed to use the processes that the target fab uses."
Certainly Intel used to like people to believe that close architecture/process co-operation worked in their favour.
"Tick tock" advances used to be a key marketing message from Intel: alternate process improvements and architecture improvements:
"A Tick Advances Manufacturing Technology
In every "tick" cycle, Intel introduced advanced manufacturing process technology to help deliver the expected benefits of Moore’s Law to users.
A Tock Delivers New Microarchitecture
In every “tock” cycle, Intel introduced manufacturing process technologies to introduce the next big innovation in processor microarchitecture. Intel® microarchitecture advancements seek to improve energy efficiency and performance as well as functionality and density of features such as hardware-supported video transcoding, encryption/decryption, and other integrated capabilities."
from https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/intel-tick-tock-model-general.html
Tick tock was publically abandoned around 2016 when it became apparent that Intel's 10nm process wasn't what it ought to have been, see e.g.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/9447/intel-10nm-and-kaby-lake
Intel tried to continue the link by describing their new approach as "Process - Architecture - Optimisation" but sooner or later people will notice that the new products aren't available as planned.