The transport authority for Greater Manchester in northeast England ?
Geography fail, it's in Northwest England
There is life beyond the M25, it's not a myth.
The transport authority for Greater Manchester in northwest England is seeking an IT systems maker to help build a clean air zone scheme and fine drivers of prohibited vehicles in a deal which could be worth up to £235m. The project involves building systems for number plate recognition (ANPR), managing payments of fines and …
>Or they'll just change the standard and charge more people.
This is a Congestion Charging scheme dressed up as a Clean Air initiative. The original Congestion Charge proposals were a bit draconian -- Manchester is a bit more compact than London and hasn't got the extensive network of train and tube services so from what I saw most Mancs would have to pony up just to leave the house -- so I daresay they were shelved as potential political suicide. Introducing them as a "Clean Air" initiative with the vague promise that maybe they'll be withdrawn at some future date.....come on, does anyone seriously believe this stuff?
The point is ending private transportation. It's been an obsession for certain people for decades.
You may not have heard but the latest thing is that even when [!] all cars are electric, they'll still need banning because of the dust from tyre rubber.
You can't appease these people. Best to just lock them up.
(Mines the one with the McCarthy style list in the pocket.)
"UK to reduce harmful nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels."
All of that is BS, NO2 isn't really relevant in any town and it's really a movement tax. You move, you pay.
Also abolishing free movement when every movement is recorded and stored permantly, to be used later. Green fascism taken to Stasi-level.
That's the actual goal and excuses are so bad no-one actually believes them.
All of that is BS, NO2 isn't really relevant in any town
Right, all of the research on NO2 is just wrong because someone too frightened to identify themself says so. Of course it is.
I feel sorry for people like you – people driven by the mindless fear of change and the complete inability to reason about, well, anything – people whose sense of well-being is so dependent on having a car – people who are so frightened of cyclists (I always suspect because people who cycle a lot get to look kind of fit, and not like blobs of dirty grease). It must be horrid being you.
Well, ten years ago I used to feel sorry: since you've managed to take over great chunks of the world and deny us all a future I feel less sorry. You still must have horrible lives but you've doomed the rest of us – the people not driven by fear and the inability to think – to horrible lives as well. So thanks for that.
And before you whine on: yes, I have a car. In fact I have two, although one was made in 1930 and does not currently run. And as you might gather from that second car, I'm quite interested in cars: I'm just not stupid.
"Well, ten years ago I used to feel sorry: since you've managed to take over great chunks of the world and deny us all a future I feel less sorry. You still must have horrible lives but you've doomed the rest of us – the people not driven by fear and the inability to think – to horrible lives as well. So thanks for that."
Such utter, doom-mongering bollocks is hard to counter. You and your ilk are the ones perpetually frightened, and lack the ability to think.
"Well, ten years ago I used to feel sorry: since you've managed to take over great chunks of the world and deny us all a future I feel less sorry. You still must have horrible lives but you've doomed the rest of us – the people not driven by fear and the inability to think – to horrible lives as well. So thanks for that."
What? Taken over what "great chunks of the world"? Denied you (and who exactly is "us all"?) a future how? If you're not driven by fear, why are you so scared about another bogeyman YOU cannot measure yourself but have to rely on those with a vested interest in PROVING it is increasing proving it is increasing?
"people who are so frightened of cyclists "
I am a driver, a cyclist and a pedestrian - and some of the worst PAVEMENT (or the footpath/sidewalk/pavement/whatever you want to call it) users I have the misfortune to encounter are the lycra-clad Cyclists who seem to think they have right-of-way everywhere and nobody else should ever get in their way. I'm guessing you are one of them. Sensible cyclists - those who obey the law and ride in a safe, considerate, manner are no problem. The obliviots who ride like they are the only road or pavement users who should be there are a danger to themselves and everyone around them.