Makes a change
for Google/Apple to be seen as less Evil than [insert your National Government].
Apple and Google will ban location-tracking by apps using their new coronavirus contract-tracing API, newly renamed ExposureNotification. In a set of guidelines [PDF] for the API released today, the companies said that developers will not be able to access or even seek permission to access location data using the app. That's …
It's not all about you. Think outside your individualism ideology.
In general, the value of a network increases with the number of nodes and this is no exception. It will only work with a significant uptake.
Secondly, you aren't doing this for yourself anyway. If you are young and healthy you are very unlikely to die. You would probably get quite sick and have a real chance of ending up with residual lung damage that it might take (eg) a year to clear. The people at real risk are your and other people's grandparents and people with diseases like diabetes. If you don't care about them, then go with protecting yourself from the security risk. the risk is very minor compared to a whole bunch of stuff you and the rest of us do every day but it does have that cool narrative of heroic individual resistance.
@Jim Birch: Ultimately, I *don't* care enough about others that the privacy of myself and others is negotiable. At root, I rather despise the people who put their life before all other things regardless of cost to others. Life is about more than the mere fact of living - quality beats quantity and these apps have a huge potential to reduce quality of life for far more people than will die, just as the results of the lockdown will have devastating effects on far more people than it will benefit. Part of his is familial - we all have an attitude of "if it's your time, so be it", couple with "I don't want to be a burden on anyone". I'd possibly have more relatives left if we had a different attitude, but c'est la vie et la mort. I was mortified when my wife insisted we self-isolate for a fortnight recently, and we had to accept help from others (even though I would happily offer that same help to others). My mum, in her mid-eighties, is going about her business almost as usual, and I'm pleased that she is.
I have long been a supporter of human rights, but, increasingly, the damage that the current iteration has on communitarianism has troubled me, and the response to this virus has crystallised that to near opposition. It is time for some good old-fashioned utilitarianism to be applied - balance harms with benefits.
One assumes Google will still slurp and keep the location data for themselves. Just not sharing it with others....except the obligatory NSA, FBI, CIA etc.
It has always bugged me how Google has got away with bundling Bluetooth permissions with location so they can get location on apps that don't need it. There is no need for the app for bluetooth scales to need the location permission but impossible to use it if you deny,
Of course, having bluetooth in hair brushes, toothbrushes, toasters etc is another debate on its own...
That's been explained a number of times already.
Using bluetooth to find other devices - as is needed to hook up to your scales for example - is one way of identifying location. Build up a large enough database of IDs, and proximity to another devices is enough to locate you fairly closely. As with doing the same thing via WiFi SSIDs or base station MACs, you can be as careful as you want, it only needs one "I've nothing to hide" id10t to populate that database.
And THAT is why finding your scales means granting location permissions to an app.
It makes more sense to throw the tracking app idea out the window altogether.
Judging distances via bluetooth is a shambles to begin with due to how all different phones with different chipsets output the BT signal and how they receive it. Working on that flawed data and advising people (advising them what exactly?) based on that is pointless,
Even if you accept someone will change their behaviour based on the app, we have to assume everyone has a mobile phone and installs the app. There would be so many holes and missing information in the big picture, I just dont see it being useful in any way at all. Except for goverments to have one database to easily track who interacts with who, without waiting for the NSA and GHCQ's to do the search through their collated phone mast info instead. /Cynic
Not to mention the fact that they seem to expect people to voluntarily tell the app that they have Corona. So...their entire dataset is built on voluntary submission from users. The same users who forget their 4-digit pin within 5 minutes of setting it.
And what happens when the 4Chan/Anonymous crowd (or whatever they're called these days) decide to start playing around with these "voluntary" submissions or submitting bogus submissions? It all seems like the Highway to Clusterfuck to me.
"Not to mention the fact that they seem to expect people to voluntarily tell the app that they have Corona. So...their entire dataset is built on voluntary submission from users."
A.K.A. "crowdsourcing", which is what a large chunk of the web from Wikipedia to Tripadvisor is built upon.
You just need someone to be able to "Like" your announcement that you have Covid-19, and possibly upload a photo of the person you caught it from.
"we have to assume everyone has a mobile phone and installs the app". No we don't; it doesn't have to be perfectly adopted or to perfectly judge distance by Bluetooth to have the potential to help. I can see the value of a central database in giving epidemiologists better information to help manage this pandemic, and also better insight for future pandemics.
I heard talk up front of sunset clauses that would ensure the data was deleted by a certain date. I don't think that is happening now, and worse, apparently a user has no right to request deletion of submitted data (if true, I don't know what exception the HMG is using to get through GDPR) and it appears selling on of the data is no longer excluded.
So, I have no problem with the principle of contributing personal data for overall Public Health benefit, and I started wanting to support the HMG app but the implementation looks worse and worse. Perhaps inevitable in any HMG IT project of this scale.
But I still expect to use the app.
PS I am one of the 3 million people voluntarily reporting through the COVID Symptom Tracker which has produced some interesting results already https://covid.joinzoe.com/
Just that there isn't more than one app allowed per country - so the US has one official app, you can't get a state like Florida creating their own or companies confusing people by creating "USA coronavirus app" that slings ads for bleach at you or something.
There's a huge number of android phones that don't get OS updates anymore. Is the new API ever going to be available on those?
EDIT: Never mind I found the answer. It's going to be implemented in in the play services - a bit of Android that's closed source and kept updated by Google themselves.
That's not how the OEMs operated back then. (particularly certain middle Kingdom manufacturers who forked Android 5.1 to add their own shameless iOS clone UI).
Fragmentation in Android is much lower these days, but again, I am yet to find another app which reports it is incompatible with my device.
That this meant the UK app was going to be blocked as they have made a big deal of doing GPS access as an addon. In reading the details looks like they can still go ahead as long as they dont access the Google or Api contact tracking API in the same app.
I think this then puts a lie to the fact that the Data Guzzlers at NHSX and friends can use the Google/Apple API's.
I do wonder what happens if Scotland say decides to develop a separate app based around DP3T - do either Apple or Google have a separate AppStore for Scotland?
If it's an API they're going to bake into iOS and Andoird, there's no way to opt-out, it wil be used by google just like they use location now, even when its turned off. So saying you're not going to "download it" doesn't make sense, it will be there in the next Android update, ready for the guvmints to use on you.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022