Re: I'm not addicted to social media, in fact I never use it
This round of posts to this story is almost unbelievable. Have you all been on the jungle juice?
Again, read what I have actually said. Now do it again! Right, you've even quoted my words above correctly, so why don't you actually understand them? They're really simple. Let's try again:
'I'm not addicted to social media, in fact I never use it'
Let me say again what this actually means. I DO NOT use social media and I have no social media accounts. Now let me repeat that again in even simpler English: this means that 'I have no addiction to social media' BECAUSE I cannot even use it. If perhaps that is still insufficiently clear enough for you, then let me restate it again in an even more laborious way:
* I do not have a Google account.
* I do not have or use Gmail.
* I do not have a Twitter account.
* I do not have a Facebook account.
* Nor do I have any accounts with similar entities like that of Facebook (such as LinkedIn, etc.).
This means that I cannot use social media even if I wanted to (that is, unless I actually created an account, which I have not done)! Surely that's clear enough!
Feedback to El Reg is NOT the equivalent of social media! These posts are a somewhat like letters to the editor of a newspaper. Clearly, you are not old enough to know what newspapers are. Therefore, I'd suggest out of self improvement that you research both the history of newspapers and letters to the editor!