The truth is way out there!
Also, 5G specs allow far more individual devices to connect to mast, making it suitable for swarms of connected sensors and gadgets (' Internet if Things). Older cellular protocols carried a large overhead for each connected device regardless of how little bandwidth it required.
People are slowly waking up to the risks. First we had attempts to control and modify human behaviour via toxoplasmosis-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxoplasmosis#Society_and_culture
Which although achieving widespread infections, failed to fully achieve the goals of providing a good host, ie provision of food, shelter and broadband connectivity. However, infection and behavioural modification had more success amongst radio network professionals, mainly due to the ability to utilise those radio networks for command and control. It is no coincidence that these are described as 'cell networks', supporting cellular communication and the further spread of memetic virii.
Toxoplasmosis is also known to increase risk-taking behaviour amongst the infected, however this is typically denied by CCP 'fact checkers'. It should however be unsuprising that cellular networks enable infected hosts to be controlled and directed by cellular devices. This has had some issues, such as the number of hosts and colonies lost due to inattention and interfacing with fast moving objects. This may be an artefact of using a cat vector, and an inherited behaviour.
As cellular networks have advanced however, additional features have been implemented that allow better host tracking and positioning via cellular protocols, and bi-directional transmission via carrier waves. Most importantly, features such as-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dying_gasp
Provide colonies with an ability to signal an emergency, and potentially flee their host. 5G is simply a logical evolution in cellular and sub-cellular behaviour enabling wider transmission and communication. Typical hosts remain unaware of this manipulation thanks to successful misdirection efforts, notably IPv6 (Infection Protocol, Viral stage 6). Hosts are lead to believe that the billions of addresses are to support an 'Internet of Things', not realising the things are the ability to support hundreds of sub-netted colonies within a single host. Again it should be no suprise that this was championed by cellular networks.
Current events should also be no suprise given 'social distancing' provides protection to hosts, and demonstrates the sophistication of command and control capabilities of already infected hosts to direct behaviour of others for their own 'well being and safety'. Law enforcement hosts have been directed to locate and eliminate saboteurs so that 5G networks can continue deployment.
All of this should be obvious to any serious researcher given the preponderance of evidence from various beta programs and simulations such as 'The Sims', which allowed colonies to test various host behavious. There have also been various optimisations utilising host-generated systems. A notable example being the spread of 'apps' such as Instagram. This was named in honor of colonies of gram negative/positive pathogens that have managed to direct hosts to spread data. Some wonder why so many images are mundane/inane, but if you think at the bacterial/viral scale, these images allow vast quantities of data to be embedded via steganography. This also explains why cellular devices have consistently 'improved' image resolution and size so that colonies can more easily share the antics of their hosts.
It's all simple really..