Fascinating - Westcott is not that far away, could we wander in and start going around w/o calling ahead?
German scientists, Black Knights and the birthplace of British rocketry
It is difficult to trump the long-defunct Blue Streak missile development and test facility at RAF Spadeadam for a sense of historical ennui and lost opportunity. The sheer number and scale of the remains, their dilapidated nature and isolated location make it a place unique, depressing and awe-inspiring in equal measure. But …
COMMENTS
-
-
Monday 27th January 2020 16:37 GMT I ain't Spartacus
Re: Another interesting article
There was a lot of general rocket research going on. The problem with developing our own nuclear missile was felt to be that Britain was too small for many missiles to survive a first strike. At which point having an independent balistic missile to throw at the Soviets within the first few minutes of them attacking was no cheaper than using the V Bomber force we'd already got - just with exending their range by giving them an air-launched cruise missile.
Particularly as the US were developing Skybolt. Until Kennedy (or was it Eisenhower?) cancelled it. At which point we were quite pissed off because the US had promised it as an option when we cancelled Blue Streak. There was some thought that this was deliberate, because the US wanted to maintain a monopoly on strategic nuclear strike within NATO - and I'm not sure that opinion from within Whitehall is completely unfair either. This is covered in part by Peter Hennessey's brilliant book (all his stuff is great actually) 'The Silent Deep'. Which also covers Chevaline - mentioned in this article. Incidentally Chevaline (a "cheap" alternative to a full MIRV) cost £5 billion to develop, over the 70s - that's in 1970s money. Maybe the equivalent of £20bn today?
Incidentally Kennedy offered to hand over the Skybolt stuff for the UK to continue developing it, but as MacMillan said, it's pretty hard to sell the public on spending loads of money on a system the US has rejected as a failure. Hence the Americans were talked into sharing Polaris, in return for a nice base for their subs in Scotland - and a promise that the British nuclear deterrent could be put under joint NATO command with the UK having the final say on firing it - something that never happened. In the end I think NATO had some "dual-key" systems, like the B60 gravity bombs, where say the German and US governments would have to jointly agree to use them - but other than the US, UK and France kept control of their own stuff.
Anyway the reason I think that the UK abandoned the rockets is that they gave very few options - because you only had a few minutes from detecting an incoming attack before being forced to take the decision to retaliate. Whereas the submarine based nuclear deterrent is safe and much harder to knock out with a first strike.
Obviously Britain maintained a missile industry, hence the mention of things like Seaslug and Alarm in the article - but nothing bigger.
-
Monday 27th January 2020 19:19 GMT John Brown (no body)
Re: Another interesting article
The USA has a track record of pointing at their allies high tech achievements which compete with their own and telling them they could save a fortune by cancelling the project because the US promises a "great deal" by selling them "better" US stuff. Then not quite coming through on the deal. There was a mach 3 Canadian fighter jet too.
-
Monday 27th January 2020 21:13 GMT GrumpyKiwi
Re: Another interesting article
The Canadian fighter was the Avro (Canada) Arrow. Which was a potentially very good interceptor for shooting down Russian bombers that had the misfortune to enter testing at the moment that the USSR demonstrated Sputnik - showing that bombers were no longer the primary threat to be concerned with.
-
Tuesday 28th January 2020 13:43 GMT I ain't Spartacus
Re: Another interesting article
GrumpyKiwi,
Which is also why fighter planes have been getting generally slower since the 60s. I don't think there's many frontline aircraft left that can do Mach 2 - which used to be reasonably common.
Presumably for all sorts of boring reasons. Though having fewer types and therefore not having the luxury of stupidly fast interceptors with incredibly short ranges and horrible maintenance requirements has got to be one of them.
-
Tuesday 28th January 2020 22:08 GMT imanidiot
Re: Another interesting article
Slower over the average of the entire flight yes, but aircraft like the F-22 and F-35 can maintain Mach 1+ for extended periods of time (super-cruise). The earlier jets like the Century series could only manage short bursts of Mach 2 and a bit before their engine blew, they ran out of fuel or the airframe overheated (or all three) and flew subsonic most of the mission.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Monday 27th January 2020 10:38 GMT revenant
Great article.
I walked up to the High Downs site on a visit to the Isle of Wight a few years ago. It's quite impressive but I came away feeling very angry that so much potential was scrapped on an apparent government whim.
Next time I'll make sure to go off-season and do a bit of exploring.
-
Monday 27th January 2020 10:55 GMT Craig 2
Regularly run/walk/ride up the downs around the Needles Battery and there are loads of interesting structures. Of course most of them just look like lumps of concrete or fixings poking out of the earth so some historical context from the article is great. There's also tunnels etc. in the cliff facing Alum Bay which are worth an explore if you're adventurous :)
-
Monday 27th January 2020 12:26 GMT CliveS
Re: German scientists, Black Knights and the birthplace of British rocketry
"so much potential was scrapped on an apparent government whim"
In the 60s and 70s the UK was a bit of an economic basket case. The Pound had been devalued in 1967, and successive Conservative and Labour governments had failed to halt the decline. At the same time that Black Arrow was being cancelled, Rolls Royce was being bailed out by the government due to the number of defence-related commitments RR had. So money was tight and many projects had to be axed. It didn't help the British space programme that prior to the cancellation of Black Arrow, NASA had offered to launch British satellite payloads for free, an offer that was revoked once the cancellation was announced.
Been to High Downs a few times, and I share your sense of anger and frustration. That Britain is the only nation to have developed a satellite launch capability and then walked away is an ignominious record...
-
Monday 27th January 2020 12:52 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: German scientists, Black Knights and the birthplace of British rocketry
And of course, we scrapped it about a decade before people started giving serious thoughts to the commercial prospects of spaceflight - something ESA and the Ariane series were all too quick to adopt. At the time, space was just seen as a cost rather than an economic driver.
Black Arrow was almost the smallest rocket to carry a useful payload to orbit, so I wonder what a follow-on to Black Arrow would have looked like and whether the UK would have carried on with HTP - which although terrifying stuff, is much less horrifying than dealing with hypergolic fuels or the technical nightmares of cryogenic rocketry.
-
Monday 27th January 2020 15:30 GMT CliveS
Re: German scientists, Black Knights and the birthplace of British rocketry
"I wonder what a follow-on to Black Arrow would have looked like"
You might want to check out Black Prince. It would have had a first stage based on Blue Streak (LOx/Kerosene), Black Arrow (HTP/Kerosene) as second stage, and a third stage based on a solid fuel rocket. When the project was cancelled, the Blue Streak first stage was re-purposed for the first stage of the Europa launch system from EDOL (predecessor to ESA).
-
Monday 27th January 2020 16:44 GMT I ain't Spartacus
Re: German scientists, Black Knights and the birthplace of British rocketry
Mike Richards,
You describe HTP as horrifying, and I've got to agree. The Navy built two test submarines in the 50s to use it - as a possible alternative to nuclear propulsion. HMS Explorer (nicknamed Exploder) and Excalibur.
Apparently Explorer's first captain never even got her to sea, due to all the problems. And the thing gave off so much smoke when you first started the engines (a tricky and dangerous process) that they once didn't notice that they were on fire - until the chief engineer walked into the control room and noticed people being overcome by fumes.
-
Tuesday 28th January 2020 11:39 GMT phuzz
Re: German scientists, Black Knights and the birthplace of British rocketry
HTP might not be the sort of thing you'd want in a submarine, but in comparison to other substances used to fuel rockets, it's a peach. You can have an open container of HTP on a workbench an nobody will die (probably).
Compare that to something like Red Fuming Nitric Acid, (which is inhibited by adding HF!), or hydrazine (if you can smell it, then you're over the exposure limit, sorry).
-
Tuesday 28th January 2020 22:23 GMT imanidiot
Re: German scientists, Black Knights and the birthplace of British rocketry
Obligatory link when discussing rocket fuels: Ignition; An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants. By John D. Clark
Very interesting read and a good eye opener on why there are so many superfund sites in the US. (I mean, silly little ideas like adding pure elemental mercury to rocket fuel because nobody wanted to make a hundred pounds of dimethyl mercury for them for some odd reason...)
-
-
-
Tuesday 28th January 2020 14:38 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: German scientists, Black Knights and the birthplace of British rocketry
Kursk.
Leaking HTP tank in a large exercise torpedo without a warhead, started decomposing inside a closed torpedo tube, blew open the inner door and then after a few minutes of heating everything in the torpedo room to a couple of thousand degrees C with the torpedo fuel there was a multiple armed torpedo warhead detonation that blew a hole in the hull and sank the sub.
Not recommended at all.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Monday 27th January 2020 11:02 GMT TVU
German scientists, Black Knights and the birthplace of British rocketry
@Alun Taylor, thank you so much for your very interesting and informative tour of the remnants of the British rocketry programme. I now wish that it could be turned into a really interesting documentary, e.g. on BBC Four.
-
Monday 27th January 2020 12:36 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: German scientists, Black Knights and the birthplace of British rocketry
Seconded. It's been a long time since Channel 4 made their 'Britain's Cold War Super Weapons' series and I don't think it is (legally) available.
BTW. If you haven't read it; 'Vertical Empire' by C.N. Hill is a good look at the Blue Streak, Black Knight, Black Arrow and ELDO programmes.
-
-
Monday 27th January 2020 12:05 GMT Anonymous Coward
What Ails you?
Aylesbury not Ailsbury
I know it is Monday but... Has the spellchecker gone on strike?
Or was it downed by a rogue 'Blue Streak'?
I'm old enough to remember the anti-aircraft missile battery that was near RAF Wyton when the Bombers were operational there. You could see them from the A141. This is probably circa 1960-64. Going towards Warboys from Huntingdon you passed Wyton (on your right) and they were a little farther along on your left (or was it right because they diverted the road about then).
-
-
Monday 27th January 2020 13:23 GMT CliveS
Re: Science Museum exhibit from a few years back
Bloodhound Mk2 could go from Mach 1 to Mach 2.5 is about 4 seconds, and hit Mach 1 in its own length, so let's assume acceleration is constant from launch to Mach 2.5.
Mach 1 is 340m/s at sea level, and Mach 2.5 is 850m/s. Bloodhound could achieve that in 4s which would give rate of acceleration of 127.5m/s/s or approximately 13G. Which is pretty much equivalent to typical launch escape systems for manned rockets.
-
Monday 27th January 2020 19:47 GMT ClockworkOwl
Re: Science Museum exhibit from a few years back
I can confirm that it must have been quite loud,
A three foot model rocket went supersonic off the pad at one of the HPR meets I went to a few years ago...
It wasn't just the attention of the RSOs that was grabbed!
The shock was shared variously that day, as several flyers discovered the power of Cessaroni VMAX reloads, some with ERUD :@)
-
-
Monday 27th January 2020 13:10 GMT adam 40
Stripped
"all control instrumentation has long since been stripped out of the High Downs site"
Glad to have helped with that! As a boy in the '70's, interested in electronics, there were some nice pickings to be had on my summer holiday, as they hadn't completely stripped it all out when I visited.....
-
Monday 27th January 2020 14:36 GMT Red Ted
Nammo - purveyors of rockets to Land Speed Record cars
Nammo are supplying the rocket to go in the next version of the Bloodhound LSR
Also it's called "Bloodhound" as Ron Ayers worked on the missile design too.
-
Monday 27th January 2020 15:27 GMT werdsmith
I also went over the barrier and explored the concrete emplacement close up. Would not have liked to have been there in the 60s without ear defenders.
There is also an earlier gun emplacement for defending the shipping channel approaching Pompey which is why it is called Needles Battery. And Tennyson down is also very nice, the view across Alum Bay and across to Bournemouth and the south coast is also glorious. Many reason to go that way rather than the sweet factory and glass blowing.
-
Monday 27th January 2020 23:02 GMT Mike 16
German Scientists
There's an I.T. Angle as well.
Years ago I attended a talk on Konrad Zuse. IIRC, it was given by his son. Anyway, as Berlin was crumbling, Zuse managed to find transport for his computer (Z3 maybe?) by reverting to its original 'V" prefix. They left Berlin traveling in company with Von Braun, but decided to part company as the territory they were traversing was mostly patrolled by British troops, who Zuse thought might not be too welcoming to Von Braun for some reason. So he split off before the true nature of Allied attitudes toward German scientists was revealed. He ended up in Switzerland and a bit later offered the computer to the Allies, who declined because the guy they asked to evaluate it said there was nothing of interest. Apparently Flaoting point with hidden-bit mantissa,or a programming notation to ease development of algorithms were of no interest.
I believe that machine ended up at ETH where it was used for several years.
-
Tuesday 28th January 2020 02:10 GMT Tim99
Westcott's sister site, The Royal Gunpowder Mills:-
Could be a good day out for those who are interested in this sort of thing, particularly if you have children/grandchildren: Site link.
Making gunpowder on the site goes back to the C17th; which was purchased by the Crown in the C18th. By WW1 it was an import centre for manufacturing Cordite. At the start of WW2 it was the only UK manufacturer of the "modern" explosive RDX, and significant research was carried out on the explosives used in Barnes Wallis's bouncing bomb, Tallboy, and Grand Slam weapons.
After WW2. the site became the Explosives Research and Development Establishment (ERDE) and in 1977 it was merged with the Rocket Propulsion Establishment Westcott (RPE - Parent Article) to form two Propellants Explosives and Rocket Motor Establishments, PERME Waltham Abbey, and PERME Westcott.
-
Tuesday 28th January 2020 15:09 GMT Aristotles slow and dimwitted horse
Taking on board the Governments current approach to our scientific and historical culture; I fully expect that quite soon all of these named sites will be preserved for future posterity under the protective embrace of new housing estates. That, or they will be pay-walled by the asshats at "National trust".