
WHY DON'T I HAVE BAIL!?!?
You don't think it could possibly be related in some way to the previous convictions and the murder charge, do you?
Two men have been charged over the death of IBM engineer Shuo Zeng, who died on his birthday, on New Year's Eve, after his laptop was snatched while in a cafe. Byron OJ Reed Jr, 22, and Javon Eugene Lee, 21, have been charged with murder and involuntary manslaughter respectively, as well as second-degree robbery, after an …
There's a big push among "woke" prosecutors in the US to not even bother prosecuting "victimless" crimes like burglary, shoplifting and the like. An example is Suffolk County District Attorney Rachael Rollins in Boston, who won't prosecute these crimes because they discriminate against, well, criminals. In California specifically, Proposition 47 passed five years ago gives a green light to commit crimes as long as the merchandise or the drugs stolen are less than $950 in value.
The value of a work laptop far exceeds $950.....
Besides, all prop 47 does is align California laws with most states where it's not grand theft if it's under $1000 anyway. Burglary and robbery are still felonies and snatching someones laptop is robbery.
But thanks for the propaganda post - seems like the hate on California is spreading to El Reg along with deep misinformation....
You don't have bail because you just made the world poorer. You killed a scientist that could have helped make so many lives better, to try to enrich your own sorry life very slightly. You should be chained to a dynamo to produce power for others, or forced to pick up waste endlessly from the side of the road, or filter the waste from a Chinese factory with your lungs. But no, you'll use your time in prison to make yourself stronger and more able to commit more crime when you're released.
Scum.
"There's a deeper question here about why after so many arrests these alleged perps were still at large and unreformed."
The US penal system is not designed to reform, it is a business intended to make money. When they come out, they are even less able to get employment, and have larger debts, so go straight back to crime - and become more raw material for the prison business.
To be honest, most criminals simply don't want to reform. They enjoy living their life this way. My cousin whom I will not name, has in the past uttered the words "Prison ain't so bad, I enjoy it!".
He was arrested many times as a teenager. Eventually he was put in the nick at the age of 17 for beating someone up for their iPhone (first gen) (GBH and theft).
He wasn't remorseful in the slightest for his actions. In fact, he still often makes jokes about "the rich guy with too much money to spend on phones".
He was released to the public a year later, and his father was able to secure him a decent job working for his fathers employer. However, within a month working for this company he was caught on CCTV stealing from his employer at night, using the yard keys he was given. He was even seen putting a middle finger up to the Camera laughing (Yes, he knew there was cameras).
This also caused his employer to sack his father who had been working there for 25 years.
And big shock, he was put in the nick again.. Sadly, he was eventually released again, however at this point he couldn't find any work, and the family wouldn't help him. We disowned him.
This made him homeless. However, because he didn't want to be homeless... he beat up the sweeny while he kept yelling "Arrest me!".
So that's where he is now, because as he says, free food and easy living.
So, I wouldn't be so shocked if criminals are happy to return to crime after leaving prison... not everyone is happy to "reform".
> It is also possible that the two men were responsible for the theft of this reporter’s laptop in San Francisco in August last year: Lee fits the description of the person who grabbed my machine and the robbery was carried out in the exact same way, complete with getaway car.
!!
Were you killed?!?
From an individual self preservation perspective I agree, but for the good of humanity we need some people to stand up and say No. The thought of getting a rightfully deserved kicking might just be enough to deter the average opportunist scumbag. If everybody just 'let them go' then there would be no barrier to entry in the thievery profession and we'd have a lot more thefts.
EDIT Just seen you're from SA where the chance of getting killed whilst resisting is very real, so YMMV on this.
Last time I was in Joburg there were two conversations I had with locals that stuck with me; one where a friend told me he'd just had a stairwell cage installed at home, so when (not if) his house got robbed at night, he hoped the thieves would just take the stuff and not kill his family. The second was a colleague who said crime in Joburg isn't so bad, I've only been carjacked once.
I've stepped in once, and stood by once. When I stepped in (a street mugging) I had honestly no idea what I was doing but there was a lot of swearing, a bit of pushing and some running. He was about 14.
I was 19 years old when I stood by. A man (I guess a pimp) was giving a woman a kicking, and then he pulled a knife on her. I wanted to intervene but couldn't bring myself to move; luckily an off-duty policeman jumped in and took care of it - he probably saved her life. Up until that point I thought I was pretty hard and would defend virtue wherever I saw it regardless of how weaponised the scumbag was; I grew up a lot in those few moments.
Sorry, I have to disagree. Thieves (to include "white collar" scumbags) take because they can, easily. Once society as a whole explains to them that it isn't going to be easy anymore, simple crime will go down. In order for that to happen you, me and that person over there need to step up. Some people are not equipped physically and/or mentally for this, and that is ok. It is up to the rest of us to do a little extra.
It is a shame that self defense (including that of your property) has become a sin in Western societies.
Welcome to California, where theft under $950 is "victimless" and the San Francisco bay area, where illegals and criminals have more rights than citizens, and indeed, San Francisco, across the bay from where this murder took place, where a person who was raised by Weather Underground members is the new district attorney (prosecutor).
What a topsy-turvy world we live in, eh?
California re-defined Grand Theft (and only Grand Theft) as being anything over $950 (Prop 47), which is exactly in-line with most other states where it is at least $1000, incl. Texas where its $1500 or more. So California theft laws, while made more lenient recently, are still harsher than Texas.....
Burglary and robbery are still felonies and snatching someones laptop is robbery.
But thanks for the propaganda post - seems like the hate on California is spreading to El Reg along with deep misinformation....