Somebody is bound to ask "Why waste the money on this???" ...
... so allow me to preemptively provide a one word answer:
The oldest protocluster of galaxies found to date began clumping together some 13 billion years ago, when the universe was just 6 per cent of its current age. A global team of 36 astrophysicists led by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ) studying data taken from the Keck and Gemini Observatory and the Subaru …
“However, we're surprised to see that Himiko was located not in the center of the protocluster, but on the edge 500 million light-years away from the center."
At 800 million years after the big bang, that would have covered a sizeable part of the universe, 10% or so maybe? Or do they mean it is now that far away?
The distance to Himiko wasn't stated in the article, and is apparently just another large galaxy within the z66OD protocluster. [z66OD is] "the oldest protocluster of galaxies found to date began clumping together some 13 billion years ago."
Basically the Reg article is click bait, but still demonstrates interesting science.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022