back to article Dell seasons PowerMax arrays with dash of FC-NVMe and Optane – but it's not a capacity boost

Dell EMC has injected FC-NVMe and Optane storage-class memory (SCM) into its high-end PowerMax arrays with the aim of ramping performance. The updated PowerMax specs are up to 7.5m IOPS, sub-100μs read latency and 1PB effective capacity for the 2000, and up to 15m IOPS, sub-100μs read latency, 350GB/sec and 4PB effective …

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Better late than never

    Although SCM on the array is literally "lipstick on a pig". The real value of SCM is on the server, not the array when it comes to high performance and lower latency.

    1. BigSwingingDitka

      Re: Better late than never

      If I’m paying a premium for SCM, it would make sense that I would want all my hosts to be able to take advantage of it as well as protect my data with data services like snaps, replication, and encryption. Plus if I lose the host with SCM in it, I might lose the data and no one else can access that SCM. Sticking SCM directly into servers is so FusionIO-ish. That didn’t work out too well for them.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Better late than never

      Agree on a single server without any other services. But consider the use-case for shared database cluster disks. Shared hypervisor storage, Vmware’s vmotion. PowerMax’s Storage Direct Backup capability, array based DR Replication in SRDF; DR without stealing host CPU or Host Bus Adapter cycles. Active/Active support with SRDF/Metro, etc.

      Yes I am a 25 year unabashed Symmtrix/DMX/VMAX/PowerMax fanboy.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    SCM in SANs is of limited value

    Any impartial infrastructure nerd will tell you that SCM needs to be as close as possible to the server CPU to have the most value, where latency is measured in nanoseconds, no microseconds.

    Adding into a SAN doesn't really accomplish much for an application running in the server - latency will still exist between SAN and server, no matter how fast the SAN can respond to data block request.

    It may have some limited use in some of the SAN data services - mirroring, replication, some of the inline data activities (deduplication, data integrity checking, etc) but with remote replication, link aggregate bandwidth will be the limiting factor here.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021