back to article Qualcomm gets to keep its chip tech to itself – for now – after federal agencies gang up on FTC

Qualcomm won’t be obliged to license key patents to its competitors – for now – after it won a stay at the Ninth Circuit. The appeals court was asked by the chipmaker to put the brakes on a number of enforced changes made after Qualcomm lost a high-profile court case brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Key among …

  1. Marketing Hack Silver badge

    Did the FTC find an anti-trust violation or potential violation?

    I'm not sure they should be forcing the licensing of Qualcomm technology unless they have a reasonably well-founded fear of violations of anti-trust laws.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Granting a stay doesn't mean much

    The only reason they wouldn't would be if they felt they had an absolutely airtight case against Qualcomm that could not survive any possible appeals. This just means it'll be a few years before we know the outcome - probably after Apple has moved on from Qualcomm.

  3. Zippy´s Sausage Factory

    Off topic, but does anyone else feel the guy in the photo looks like a deepfake cross between Alan Titchmarsh and Sylvester Stallone?

  4. bombastic bob Silver badge

    You forgot to mention

    that the FTC lawsuit against Qualcomm is *LITERALLY* *SIDING* *WITH* *CHINA*


    And this is why DOJ and others are AGAINST the FTC on this one.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: You forgot to mention

      Siding with the law you mean. The DOJ is unfortunately led by someone with no scruples who will do whatever Trump wants for political purposes, without regard to the law.

      If the FTC was 'siding with Russia' I'm sure you would have no problem with it, since your snowflake cheeto hero is Putin's bitch.

  5. SImon Hobson Silver badge

    I thought the standards processes included provisions for patents - specifically that any SEPs have to be declared and licensed to all under FRAND terms ? Or didn't Qualcomm take part in that particular standards process ?

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      They did, and their patents are. The dispute is basically over what "fair", "reasonable" and "non-discriminatory" mean, since Qualcomm has been forcing companies to license their non-SEP patents to be allowed to license their SEP patents, and charging as a percentage of the overall device - so if you add more RAM or a better display making it cost more you have to pay Qualcomm more even though those upgrades have absolutely nothing to do with Qualcomm's technology.

      1. bazza Silver badge

        No Long Term Thinking?

        Arguably this situation has come about due to the board of Qualcomm engaging in short term thinking, instead of seeing to the long term viability of the the business. Overly aggressive tactics may lead to stellar short term profits, but it’s risky and doesn’t build a good long term foundation for a Plan B.

        And they’re not the only ones.

        With Qualcomm it’s patents. With Google and Facebook it’s data and privacy they’re abusing. With Amazon it’s a monopoly position in the retail market and a reliance on the gig economy. With Boeing it’s cost cutting to the point where they’ve forgotten how to build aircraft properly.

        Basically if one scouts around a bit you can see that quite a large fraction of the large scale tech and engineering industries are somehow exposed to existential risks that are increasingly coming true, either at the hand of overseas or domestic regulators or both. Sometimes repeatedly so (Google, Facebook in particular).

        Add that all up and it could become a pretty serious issue for the USA, and it’s not one that is being tackled. It’s all very well saying that the market will sort itself out no matter what, but if too many businesses suffer reversals all at about the same time, you’ve got a national problem. “Move fast and break things” might be a cool and trendy business motto, but if everyone does it and everything ends up broken, what then?

        Propping up one of them like Qualcomm, perpetuating the poor practices that have lead to this, isn’t fixing the problem.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020