
Liabilities
If the records included health information, they could be looking at serious fines. HIPAA allows fines of up to $50,000 per violation, and it sound like they have around 20 million violations.
The healthcare debt collector ransacked by hackers, who gained access to millions of patients' personal information, has filed for bankruptcy protection. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, aka American Medical Collection Agency, told the Southern New York US District Court this week that it was seeking chapter 11 bankruptcy …
>>>
For example, AMCA says it owes IBM $15,299.64 for IT services, and Cablevision is owed $7,679.02, presumably for internet service.
<<<
We watched an awful lot of Cable TV Porn (Cablevision- $7,679.02) instead of doing anything... but
We hired those IBM consultant dudes for two hours (IBM $15,299.64) and they forgot to tell us anything about that security doohickey thing...
>>>>
For example, AMCA says it owes IBM $15,299.64 for IT services, and Cablevision is owed $7,679.02, presumably for internet service.
<<<<
So they list at least two debts amounting to ~ $20,000 and they're filing for chapter 11?!? These have got to be under the "small debtors" category, or there are some 0s missing from those numbers.
Edit:
Just looked at the bankruptcy filing and their largest creditor is owed something like $108,000. I notice that a significant proportion of their large creditors are law firms. HMMmmm...
A triumph of free market capitalism over basic humanity and economics, resulting in a total cost per person of more than double anywhere else in the world (except Switzerland), and even a cost to the taxpayer per person higher than anywhere in the EU.
For worse results than anywhere in the G20.
Well done. "Socialised" medicine would be cheaper and better, but you can't have that.
A triumph of free market capitalism over basic humanity and economics, resulting in a total cost per person of more than double anywhere else in the world (except Switzerland), and even a cost to the taxpayer per person higher than anywhere in the EU.
For worse results than anywhere in the G20.
Oh, please, stop with your indisputable facts! Don't you know the US live in a twisted and delusional reality?
US citizen ends up in debt.
The alternative: UK citizen ends up dead.
Case in point, my late mother needed an urgent life-saving cancer operation. The NHS was constantly about to do it, but the operation date constantly slipped back. After several months of dates that never materialised, the family finally pooled resources to go private (my own £15k there was taken from funds intended to go towards "getting on the housing ladder"). But it was too late: the cancer had spread to her brain, where it was inoperable.
The NHS. Where you pay three times over:
1. Through your years in good health and not using it.
2. The ultimate price when it fails you in your time of need.
3. Your relatives who realise too late that the NHS is just fobbing you off, and pay to go private.
That'll be the majority who've never needed a time-critical life-saving operation.
I've heard figures (from that hotbed of conspiracy theory, BBC Radio 4) suggesting that the proportion of people who win the NHS lottery and get the care when they really need it is only around one third.
The other two thirds aren't alive to tell the tale. And their surviving relatives get downvoted for just mentioning it, 'cos that's blasphemy.
If we're going for anecdotes, a few years back, I was diagnosed with acute appendicitis. They'd chopped it out by the end of the day. When they removed it, it was perforated and gangrenous, so a delay of another day would probably ended up with me being dead, or at least seriously ill.
Of course, this being on the NHS it cost me nothing, and I still got full pay for the month I was off work. How much would an appendectomy have cost me in the US, given that I'd have the cheapest insurance I could find? What's the chances I'd have been paid a month of sick leave and not just fired?
"How much would an appendectomy have cost me in the US, given that I'd have the cheapest insurance I could find? What's the chances I'd have been paid a month of sick leave and not just fired?"
Possibly as high as $7900 (ACA-mandated highest out-of-pocket maximum), plus the cost of the insurance itself. (If the provider is in network. If out of network, the insurance may not pay anything, and there's no limit to how much the provider could charge.) Employers aren't required to provide sick leave, but can't fire someone for being out on medical leave.
Emergency services are provided to anyone, regardless of their ability to pay - but they WILL try to collect afterwards.
Unless you had just changed job and your new insurance didn't kick in for 6months
Or a doctor not in your network glanced at the x-ray and so billed you for consultation - you did remember to check everyone in the hospital was in your network while being wheeled in didn't you ? It is your responsibility.
Employers can't fire you for being sick, but employment is at will so they can fire you for no reason while you are sick - they have to just be careful to say it is for no reason.
US Citizen ends up dead if they have no money and no insurance.
The UK citizen gets free treatment at source; I'm sorry about you mum but your experience isn't mine by any stretch of the imagination.
1. My mother, diagnosed with bowel cancer Jan 2000 - starts treatment before end of same month.
2. Friends father, diagnosed with stomach cancer May 2012 - starts treatment May 2012
3. Neighbours daughter, diagnosed with breast cancer December 2016 - starts treatment December 2016
Unfortunately my mothers cancer was too far advanced to respond to treatment and she passed away the next year, but the other two are still in remission.
I know that sometimes things go wrong in the NHS but it's still way better than the US system.
Yup. I'm in the US, had to have a lab test done, and the lab would not allow the test until they had an order from a doctor. (Which was sent several times, but lab had fax machine problems. Yes, fax.) When test was done, lab put in a claim to my insurance for $317, insurance said lab (by contract) was only allowed to charge $7.62. I got billed for $7.62. (Insurance company paid $0.)
Those aren't made-up numbers - that's straight out of my medical expense tracking spreadsheet. We also owe over $4000 on a hospital visit - that's what's left after our medical insurance paid its part. "Affordable Care", hmm?
Have knowledge of this one as a third party contractor.
Management refused to dedicate proper resources to mitigate predictable risks and vulnerabilities. One man shop for 10+ Linux servers, 50ish workstations. Overworked and under budgeted.
Not the first time they were hit. Hopefully the last time.
Security is no longer an inherent luxury, you have to take proactive steps to prevent exploitation of known vulnerabilities.
Corporate America is still learning about the financial perils of refusing to address these serious threats.
Hopefully something was learned.
This post has been deleted by its author
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021