It's raining drones, but just one specimen: DJI's Matrice 200 quadcopter The UK's Civil Aviation Authority has temporarily grounded DJI's Matrice 200 following reports of the commercially used drone suffering a complete loss of power mid-flight and crashing to Earth. Chinese firm DJI has admitted its engineers are "urgently" probing customer claims related to the waterproof quadcopter series, which …
I thought intermittent loss of power and falling to the ground without operator control was a given. Though that maybe because the 'Anonymous Coward Drone Mk 3' I am flying was built by the 'Incompetent Idiot' Mk 1', who is also at the controls.
Haha.
My Mk 1 build made quite a dent losing power at 50m, as it was hauling a Canon camera at the time. As per the regulations, there was nobody anywhere near.
Fly a drone? Gonna crash. Some operators seem to forget that. Don't forget your hard hat.
"When prompted on the DJI Pilot App, we recommend all customers to connect to the internet on the app or DJI Assistant 2 and update the firmware for their aircraft and all batteries to ensure a safe flight with their drone."
Which suggests when you update the firmware, they'll effectively brick the multi-£000 drones until they're safe to fly again. Wonder what the refund status is for that situation?
On a side note, there is firmware for batteries now. Good grief!
There has to be firmware for Li-ion batteries, as the charging needs to be controlled. Plus you need to have a battery meter - which are quite unreliable on consumer tech. In the case of a drone that presumably has to auto-land on low battery status - I guess you need a method to test the battery meter and re-calibrate it every so often.
None of which has to be in the battery itself. However, certain manufacturers are keen to lock their customers into their own 'special' batteries rather than buying equivalent items at half the price. Customers lap up the 'smartness' of the batteries they pay through the nose for :)
Given the model was released in 2017 that means the batteries have had ample time to be charged and discharged a fair few times, given they're commercial drones and not playthings, which probably means the batteries can't maintain peak output, so, although not depleted, output isn't high enough and that trips something (a resistor or capacitor is suddenly in the wrong state) and the whole system gets confused and goes down.
Kinda like my Note4 when I tried to open the camera, I'd have a 1 in 4 chance of it just shutting down, ah, those were the days, when you could easily replace a battery in a phone...
My introduction to R/C helicopters was my friend who would fly his 'copters until they broke. If they were still flying after a few minutes, he would say, Hey, watch THIS! and a few minutes later, the unit was ready for the repair shelf, waiting for parts.
So when I got my first R/C helicopters and drones, I thought I could do a lot better than my friend. I was going to fly the 'copter/drone, land it, put it away unbroken.
Of course, you know what happened next ....
(Now I know why the drones I buy come with spare propellers.)
Gliding requires wings: On a drone, those are dead weight and drag inducers for all the flight envelope for the entire life of a vehicle unless its actually used in an accident.
Autorotation requires a large rotor surface to convert its kinetic rotating energy to a large amount of lift in a very short space of time by changing the pitch of the blades using cyclic. No matter the size of drone, you don't have the cyclic system on any rotor as that would introduce a massive weight and complexity penalty, so you cannot autorotate at all.
Parachutes cannot deploy quickly enough ti be useful under certain heights, so the Dead Man's Curve for a manned drone is huge compared to a heli.
What about a small canister full of compressed helium, which could inflate a balloon, thinking along the lines of airbag tech. Might not stop the impact but at least if it would slow down the descent.
A couple of jagged edge kilos dropping suddenly from 50m or so must be quite deadly.... so almost any idea would be better than none.
Helium: Maybe for a small drone, but the cubic metre of helium:kg of lift ratio puts that out of reach for anything above <10kg.
Think of the average weather balloon's size: maybe 2metre + wide to slowly lift maybe 1kg of payload? Then think of the huge balloons used by Kittinger and Baumgartner and imagine trying to compress even some of that into a cylinder small and light enough to not shrink your payload capacity enough to make the whole endeavour pointless.
Lifting balloons' lifting effect is also too "slow" for this "need lots of lift NOW" use, else Baumgartner wouldn't have taken 2.5 hrs to reach 38km - 253metres/minute or 4m/sec with a realllyyyy slow initial acceleration.
A basic airbag solution could maybe work for non-human payloads, but deceleration trauma of 120mph to zero in around 4 feet would really mess a human up.
Maybe rocket assisted braking like Curiosity, but I wouldn't want to be the poor sod on the ground set alight under the rockets!!
> Gliding requires wings: On a drone, those are dead weight and drag inducers for all the flight envelope for the entire life of a vehicle unless its actually used in an accident.
Errm... lots of fixed wing drones out there. In fact, anything that requires range over manoeu... (fuck it) doing lots of turns.
Auto-rotation requires variable pitch propellers which have a major weight penalty compared to the fixed pitch units currently installed on multi-copters. It also requires higher inertia (longer and heavier) rotors than currently used. If you were going to do that you'd be better off with a traditional 1 or 2 rotor helicopter.
Better option would be to put a ballistic parachute on it.
This is why I ain't ever getting in a flying machine that can't either glide or auto-rotate to at least a survivable landing in the event of any - partial or all - power failure... although events in Leicester make me now doubt auto-rotation as a solution as, no matter where and what heli you fly in, they all have to transition through the Dead's Man Curve
it is a bit of a 6 and 2 threes though helicopter crashes caused by hardware failure are usually catastrophically caused by either a rotor head or gearbox fail your really lucky if its something that leaves enough of the system working to make a safe autorotation landing.
manned multi-rotors do have the possibility to be safer as each rotor can be an almost totally independent system and unless you are a total looney you won't be flying a manned quadcopter with no redindancy if you look at most of the test manned multi rotors they are using 8 or more props which should allow at least a 2 prop fail more if you are lucky with the location of the breakages.
Could be someone having some "fun" with a drone jammer such as one of these :
https://www.jammer-store.com/drone-jammers/
Drones would normally use 2.4 or 5.8 Ghz which is not 4g but it is easy to understand how they are often confused... simply because they are wireless is enough for some...
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
