back to article Barclays and RBS on naughty step: Banks told to explain service meltdown to UK politicos

The influential Treasury Committee has demanded that banking execs at RBS Group and Barclays must explain why customers were again unable to access online services at the tail end of last week. On Thursday, 20 September, Barclays' systems were offline for hours, while the Royal Bank of Scotland, NatWest and Ulster Bank went …

  1. Korev Silver badge

    Who's interviewing?

    These include requests for technical details – which banks often prefer to keep close to their chest – on what caused the failure, and why any controls to mitigate against such failures had themselves failed.

    So will the person interviewing be technical enough to ask the right questions and the interviewee to answer them?

    1. Bronek Kozicki
      Happy

      Re: Who's interviewing?

      I am available.

    2. LucreLout

      Re: Who's interviewing?

      So will the person interviewing be technical enough to ask the right questions and the interviewee to answer them?

      It won't matter much, both of those banks lost all their good staff years ago.

    3. FozzyBear

      Re: Who's interviewing?

      So will the person interviewing be technical enough to ask the right questions and the interviewee to answer them?

      No and only if they have a video link to India (and that will be questionable)

  2. macjules

    "The influential Treasury Committee"

    Surely an oxymoron there?

    "It simply isn't good enough to expose customers to IT failures, including delays in paying bills and an inability to access their own money."

    Quite. It makes it so hard for HMRC to lift customers' money directly out of their bank accounts when the bank is offline.

  3. Bangem

    Deliveroo had a failure last week and they compensated me by funding my account with £5 off my next order. To be honest they didn't need to do that, I didn't ask them to. I understand that things break, it's about the time taken to correct it thats important.

    Alas I can't see Barclays doing the same with my next Direct Debit

    1. Aladdin Sane

      They just took it out of the wages of the delivery riders.

      1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

        "They just took it out of the wages of the delivery riders."

        In the case of banks, take it out of the bonus fund as a regulatory requirement. Performance will increase amazingly.

        1. LucreLout

          In the case of banks, take it out of the bonus fund as a regulatory requirement. Performance will increase amazingly.

          I doubt it. I've worked in banking for decades and there is nobody of senior director level and upwards with the least little clue about technology. There's a few layers of MD's, then several layers of D's, and literally none of them understand technology.

          Its very hard to make the right decision when you don't know what you're doing, don't know who to ask, and don't want to live with what you personally perceive as a loss of face for asking. So they go to consultants, and they spend small firtunes doing what the consultant is selling this year, with little understanding that the same consultant (note, not contractor) will sell them an entirely different solution next year.

          It'd be funny, if the consequences weren't so serious. Half or more of the senior staff in every bank I've worked at need to go, because its all just dead weight. Sorry, but it is. And that includes my own bank!

  4. Milo Tsukroff
    Mushroom

    Hooray! The Post-COBOL Apocalypse gathers steam!!

    > their banking apps and websites cannot be relied upon

    Well said! Hooray! As predicted, the Post-COBOL Apocalypse gathers steam!! Since COBOL is by far the most reliable and understandable computer language for handling money transactions, it's shunned by all hipster programmers. The cool, sorry, kewl new languages that keep popping up are so fun to play with .... looks to me that the brogrammers' attitude is, "Never trust a language over 3 [years old]." As more and more banks are pushed away from un-cool COBOL, the Apocalypse continues to build and build and build.

    1. Arthur the cat Silver badge
      Happy

      Re: Hooray! The Post-COBOL Apocalypse gathers steam!!

      ADD COBOL TO ANDROID GIVING BANKING_APP.

    2. Spazturtle Silver badge

      Re: Hooray! The Post-COBOL Apocalypse gathers steam!!

      The move away from COBOL is a management decision, it is hard to find people who know it these days, and those who do want to be paid a lot of money. Companies training people themselves? Ha! Good joke.

    3. Dan 55 Silver badge
      Meh

      Re: Hooray! The Post-COBOL Apocalypse gathers steam!!

      TSB's new system also has a COBOL back end, so I wouldn't be too keen to put my faith in COmplete BOLlocks to keep us safe from the oncoming financial apocalypse.

  5. knarf

    Explain to a bunch of FuckTurds who can't even do proper expenses

    Explain it in MP expense terms

    1. Oh I forgot

    2. We didn't the rules

    3. It's allowed

    4. I forgot the rules changed

    5. It's in my wife's name even though I'm single

    6. I'll pay it back .... honest....

    1. alain williams Silver badge

      Re: Explain to a bunch of FuckTurds who can't even do proper expenses

      7. We'll get what Brexit means agreed long before March 2019 so that industry can make plans.

      1. Adrian 4

        Re: Explain to a bunch of FuckTurds who can't even do proper expenses

        Brexit means Brexit as any fule kno.

        It lacks the intellectual rigour of a proper gnu-style recursive definition, but it's good enough for politicians.

  6. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    If you look at what new banks like Monzo are doing with their micro services and UK based IT staff you can see why the legacy banks are in so much trouble. They literally sacked everyone and thought they could outsource everything to India while being on a 1970's mainframe platform. Pure idiocy.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Except they didn't sack everyone: there are plenty of UK-based IT staff working for the big banks. There probably are fewer than there once were but there definitely are quite a few still.

      1. LucreLout

        there are plenty of UK-based IT staff working for the big banks. There probably are fewer than there once were but there definitely are quite a few still.

        There are, but we mostly work in what the bank would term "important functions", so, not retail banking.

        Don't shoot the messenger, because as a retail bank customer myself, it pisses me off to, but the money isn't made in retail so its a cost to be managed.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          I can tell you with absolute certainty that there are retail banking IT people working in the UK, including for at least one of the banks that has had an outage in the last few days.

  7. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    " Traditionally Inept Transaction Services Unusually Problematic"

    nah

    Temporary Internet Total Service Unavailability Problem

    otherwise known as SNAFU

    Situation Normal All Fucked Up

  8. UberMunchkin

    MPs are not Knowledgeable enough to ask these questions

    So there are two problems here and both have the same route cause.

    1. Banks suck at I.T. and try do anything they can to avoid modernising.

    2. MP are not technical enough to ask the right questions or understand the answers.

    The reason for this is that both groups are lead by old men who have not bothered to keep their skills up to do with the modern world.

    1. defiler

      Re: MPs are not Knowledgeable enough to ask these questions

      Banks suck at I.T. and try do anything they can to avoid modernising.

      But banks pretty-much *are* IT. They're a machine for storing, processing and moving numbers. When you distill it down, you should be able to completely automate a bank (except for when somebody wants to speak to staff). In a perfect world where nothing broke and everything followed the rules, the operational systems in a bank shouldn't need a human touch at all.

      I know, I'm reducing it to an absurd level, but the point still stands that banks are IT with a layer of marketing.

      1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

        Re: MPs are not Knowledgeable enough to ask these questions

        "banks are IT with a layer of marketing"

        Don't forget the casino bolted onto the side.

        1. LucreLout

          Re: MPs are not Knowledgeable enough to ask these questions

          Don't forget the casino bolted onto the side.

          In Barclays case the bank is "the casino", with a retail function bolted onto the side. Like most other large banks, it has an investment bank where the real money is made, a corporate function, where a little money is made, and a retail bank that makes very little and was historically used to finance the first two, but post ringfencing is even less important that it used to be.

          Obviously, its not a casino, it only looks that way to those that don't understand international finance or investment, but there ya have it.

      2. Adrian 4

        Re: MPs are not Knowledgeable enough to ask these questions

        ..IT with a layer of marketing"

        They are. But they don't admit it. They think they're terribly wise, experienced investment advisors like they used to be before they deskilled the bank staff and automated the decision making.

      3. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: MPs are not Knowledgeable enough to ask these questions

        @defiler

        "When you distill it down, you should be able to completely automate a bank (except for when somebody wants to speak to staff). In a perfect world where nothing broke and everything followed the rules, the operational systems in a bank shouldn't need a human touch at all."

        Congratulations :) You just reinvented Girobank, a fifty year old concept rolled out by the Labour government of the time (Wilson).

        GiroBank was so successful as competition for the High Street Banks that it had eventually to be privatised and ultimately shut down before it wiped out the other high street banks (as they were then called). The high street banks have subsequently shut down almost all their high street operations anyway.

        In many other parts of the world, the Girobank concept lives on. But the UK, and in particular in the City, it had to be eliminated. Isn't that marvellous.

        @Doctor Syntax

        ""banks are IT with a layer of marketing"

        Don't forget the casino bolted onto the side."

        Congratulations :) By eliminating the casino on the side, you too just re-invented Girobank (see above).

        The City's casino banking and the London property market are aspects of a world-class money laundering and financial crime centre, according to reliable sources (National Crime Agency, PPI claims outfits, Pension Protection Fund, etc). Without the casino facilities, Girobank threatened the career prospects of the banking industry dinosaurs,

        Girobank. For the many, not the few. You know it makes cents.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: MPs are not Knowledgeable enough to ask these questions

      Nicky Morgan is a 45-year-old woman, so neither a man nor especially old.

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Banks are just big IT outfits

    ...that happen to dabble in banking

    If more people realised that was the actual situation, things might improve.

    1. LucreLout

      Re: Banks are just big IT outfits

      If more people realised that was the actual situation, things might improve.

      If management realised that was the situation things would improve! And it very much IS the situation.

  10. DaveB

    Bank speek

    We are having problems that are affecting some of our customers: The online system is completely down.

    Our IT experts are analyzing the problem: The guy who knows this particular system is on holiday in Ibiza.

    We expect to be back to normal in a few hours time: We haven't a clue whats going on so we made that bit up.

    All affected customers will be compensated: As long as you fill out the form and take it to your local branch(LOL)

  11. EnviableOne

    Barclays outage is an annomoly, RBS OTOH is situation normal, their system fall over in a light breeze. I worked for a firm that was invited to tender on their new systems, we walked away as it needed re-built from the ground up and they wouldnt pay for it.

  12. caffeine addict

    I understand why the treasury gets involved if data leaks, banks look dodgy, or they shutdown key infrastructure, but what business is it of theirs if the online banking app goes down for a few hours? The money was still there and accessible, just not through one particular channel.

    I get why *we* are annoyed by it, but I don't see what the hell it has to do with the treasury...

    1. Keith Oborn

      Not in the case of Barclays last thursday. My wife had to make an urgent payment on a property transaction. Went to main branch - which of course is entirely automated, has, oh, maybe two staff doing equivalent job to those people who kick self-checkout machines in supermarkets.

      All machines were down. NONE of Barclays branches had any access to any banking services that afternoon.

      So if "online" is out, and "branch" is out, exactly how were Barclays still a consumer bank that day?

  13. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Beyond branch closings, there's serious 'Cashless Risks'

    Gotta laugh and shiver in fear whenever there's a big political push towards 'cashless'. Cashless means inconvenience when things are down plus constant surveillance as a bonus. The benefits? Still not seeing them...

    ________________

    The Swedes rebelling against a cashless society

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-43645676

    ________________

    Why cashless society is a dangerous idea

    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/letters/why-cashless-society-is-a-dangerous-idea-1.2869212

    ________________

    Visa card issue puts brakes on drive towards cashless society

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/personal-finance/visa-card-issue-puts-brakes-on-drive-towards-cashless-society-1.3519389

    1. LucreLout

      Re: Beyond branch closings, there's serious 'Cashless Risks'

      Gotta laugh and shiver in fear whenever there's a big political push towards 'cashless'. Cashless means inconvenience when things are down plus constant surveillance as a bonus. The benefits? Still not seeing them...

      Can I start by going on record that going cashless is a terrible idea. There are so many downside risks its hard to even know where to begin. However, for the government, cashless looks like a good plan because:

      A) It eliminates cash in hand work, or otherwise makes it easier to see where it is happening, while allowing crime detection opportunities - "What is little Johnny being paid 15 pounds for 23 times a day, while apparently job seeking?"

      B) It allows negative interest rates to be applied thus motivating people to go out and spend in a recession - they can't tuck it under a matress

      C) It saves a fortune in currency printing and distribution costs

      D) Millennials, bless 'em, all seem to live near cashless lives. And as we're so often told, they're the future.

      As I said, I think cashless is a terrible plan, but I can see why government would think otherwise.

    2. alain williams Silver badge

      Re: Beyond branch closings, there's serious 'Cashless Risks'

      One thing that 'cashless' does is to shift administrative burden from the shop to me. I have a whole extra lot of card transactions who's slips I need to keep and reconcile when the statement comes in.

      I dare say that many millenials will want to know why reconcile ... I regard it foolish to NOT do so.

  14. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Lloyds Bank

    Well Lloyds just disappeared one of my accounts and can't tell me where it's gone so I'd suggest none of the banks are trustworthy right now. Not sure who to move to away from these incompetent muppets.

  15. Christoph

    Consumer banking keeps going down. I wonder what would happen if the financial trading systems which move money by the billions and rely on microsecond timing were to fail for a similar amount of time?

    Or could it possibly be that they can't be bothered to put the same resources into systems for mere consumers?

    1. LucreLout

      I wonder what would happen if the financial trading systems which move money by the billions and rely on microsecond timing were to fail for a similar amount of time?

      Economic armageddon, literally. It'd be the end of days for the world economy.

      I know everyone hates banks, but the flip side, is that everyone needs banks; they just often don't know why or how much.

  16. maret77

    I would love to have forwarded this to a board member because it's written so well, but in a professional capacity, I won't forward anything with TITSUP* in the title no matter how cutesy you try to make the definition at the bottom of the well-written article.

    Come on, boys! You can do better.

  17. maret77

    Oh, and don't forget the relentless outsourcing so that any given bank's staff member doesn't really have a clue about what's going on / wrong.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like