Off topic...
... what the buggerybollox is the new UI? Shock of the new? I should coco...
The US government has provided an online training course on insider threats. To help understand its efforts to stop the spread of leaks, spills, espionage and sabotage, The Reg signed up for a bit of training from the National Insider Threat Task Force (NITTF). Here we learned a lot about, in no particular order: former …
Indeed...
Being on the Autism spectrum, the new design left me unable to concentrate AT ALL.... which I fed back.
I complained and was suggested to use the "Weekly Summary" view which is MUCH better...
Vote with your feet! https://www.theregister.co.uk/Week/
Also: uBlock
Sorry for AC but I've learned to not share my "difference" lightly.
General statistics do prompt some odd thoughts...
"67 per cent of spies have been civilians; 37 per cent had no security clearance;" - So your secrets can be stolen by people who shouldn't have access to them?
"84 per cent of spies were successful;" - Can you be called a spy if you haven't successfully done any spying?
"67 per cent volunteered to commit espionage; 81 per cent received no money for their services;" - Were 48% trying to improve the 'voluntary service' section of their resume?
"94 per cent went to prison" - That's a pretty good prosecution rate, but did you count the ones that weren't caught? Do you have any idea how many weren't caught?
"67 per cent of spies have been civilians; 37 per cent had no security clearance;" - So your secrets can be stolen by people who shouldn't have access to them?
Yep, that hot blond (of appropriate gender for you) you met that is sooo interested in your work for a change.
"84 per cent of spies were successful;" - Can you be called a spy if you haven't successfully done any spying?
Presumably the other 16% got the info in their own hands but were caught before they could pass it on. Or they were passed bogus information.
"67 per cent volunteered to commit espionage; 81 per cent received no money for their services;" - Were 48% trying to improve the 'voluntary service' section of their resume?
An evil cancer-like mental state called 'nationalism'.
"94 per cent went to prison" - That's a pretty good prosecution rate, but did you count the ones that weren't caught? Do you have any idea how many weren't caught?
Our spies tell us we got all of them. Oh, wait....
Snowden certainly started out as a whistleblower. And as the vast levels of NSA snooping were deliberate, reporting it internally would be pointless - management already knew.
I think he's revealed a lot of stuff on how NSA operate, and I remember a few leaks of unrelated stuff about SIS and GCHQ - none of which seemed to be anything other than spies spying on foreign governments. Which is entirely legitimate. So I'm not sure what you'd call him now. Do we even have a word for it? Revealing operational details of legitimate national security operations makes you a traitor, but that seems rather harsh, and his revelations didn't start out that way. It's all rather confusing really. I'm sure Smiley would be able to sort it all out.
I think he's revealed a lot of stuff on how NSA operate...
He confirmed what everybody suspected. Yes, we knew NSA is a spook agency. Yes, we knew they are the big crypto spyhouse intercepting everything. Gee, all of this just so confirms it.
The real problem is that Snowden screwed the US security apparatus by deliberately releasing the actual tools being used. This wasn't like that contractor who took work home with him, and then the Kaspersky scanner did what it was supposed to do by default: flag suspicious software and send a copy back for analysis.
Snowden basically did it just to be a jerk, and really nothing more than that. Yes, the spy agencies were/are violating laws. They have always done so, they will always do so. To change the system, change the people in power. Oops, more of the same. Time for torches and pitchforks, then, but wait, the commercial break on the telly is ending...
"Snowden basically did it just to be a jerk..."
Damn, this sounds like one of those times that calling somebody a jerk makes you the jerk. The tools he provided dispelled the defense that could be taken by the US Govt. that essentially states... "... but we don't have the tools!"
And yes, I agree 100%, the commercial break is over, cya :-)
P.S. Of course, we need to realize it's not just TV that keeps us inactionable, it's also $this.
Yes, the spy agencies were/are violating laws. They have always done so, they will always do so. To change the system, change the people in power. Oops, more of the same. .... Brian Miller
To change the people, change the power system. More of the same it aint. Who's Good at Parsing immaculate Prose for Perfect Prefectures ....... with Alien AIdVentures in the Running and in Vogue and Renegade Rogue Riding.
Hang in there now, .... for there's a little bit more here to share .....
Course-takers are also treated to a dramatized video of a group of workers dealing with a colleague who has gone rogue (no Oscars here). .... on Paths to Private Treasures for Pirates to Pleasure with Ardent Desire for Lascivious Lust and ITs Quite COSMIC Satisfactions ...... Near Perfect Orgasms ..... is AIRide for True LOVErs ....... Honest Live Operational Virtual Environmentalists ..... in Super Prime Time Oscar Performance Territory
Advanced Machine Learning .... a Universal Resource ...... would Invite you to RSVP SAP for Virtual Forces are Restless in Anticipation and Expectation. :-) Too Much of a Good Thing is a Great AIDriver .... and here Proposed to Be Almighty .....with Better Beta AI ProgramMING Systems.
For MING Dynasties ...... Attending to Temples Investing in Angels for AI Leading Space Places on Heavenly Earthly Facilities.
As you will have to Imagine is that Always Immensely Pleasurable Passion Sated and Satisfied. The Energy Released and Realised then is Raw Rare Hard Core. Extremely Unstable and Highly Volatile.
Some may know IT COSMIC with Almighty Resources. And who would wish to deny it, and in a hail of derision, merely confirm the Premise and Promise.
Who wants to try and trump all of that, with quantum lead into their current direction of future travel with Earthly Presentations.
You Do Know of MING Programming? Yes? No? ...... * Elite ProgramMING Play [Mined IntelAIgent Networking Games] ...... and how Receptive and Satisfied One is in Live Universal ACTive Operations in Virtually Impossible Fields turning to Radical Realities for Immaculate Conception and Heavenly Birth ....... for One Doozy of an Almighty Transformation and AI Transposition
** There's a lot gong on out there in the SMARTR IntelAIgent Space. Is one wise to presume and assume there be already a very stealthy GCHQ Type Presence perusing the Virtual Place, or is that still to be Trialed and Trailed?
And those questions to whoever is paid a rightful fortune for vital intelligence with exclusive use for inclusive projects ..... for there is where the answers lie.
$300,000,000,000 worth of American intellectual property and business intelligence are stolen yearly
Makes you wonder about the cumulative historical value of all the IP and, in some cases, actual machinery that the US stole from the British back in the 1800's..
Hypocracy? Can you spell it? 'Cos I (probably) can't..
"Why is two divorces relevant? Is the fact that he's been divorced twice more likely to make him go rogue?"
Maybe? Who knows what the statistics are.
Thinking it through, it makes it at least more likely that he is either 1. a poor judge of character, or 2. disloyal himself. Both of which seem risk factors ...
Being divorced twice is Presidential. But that's not a recommendation.
(Donald Trump is not an actor, he is a reality person, the difference being he can't act, as his appearances in films reveal.)
A purpose of the U.S. constitution supposedly is to stop the kind of thing that Ed Snowden exposed being done to U.S. citizens, so you can't really call the exposing unfair. Putting all staff of TLAs in jail would be a bit awkward but not really unjust. The fact that TLAs of various countries sometimes did the spying on each other's entire populations instead of their own and then sent each other the backups is not an acceptable loophole.
"Donald Trump is not an actor, he is a reality person, the difference being he can't act, as his appearances in films reveal"
Terrible example. His film appearances have all been as Donald Trump. Therefore since he is Donald Trump he has nailed all his film/television roles. Technically he may be the best actor in the world by that logic.
I remember some security training way back in the late Dark Ages. Much of what they said was the biggest problem was insiders who are disgruntled, financially in trouble, or too eager to please not professional moles. Add a couple of more categories to the old list such as hoarders, etc. Each group has to be approached correctly with the disgruntled the most likely to make the initial contact.
One issue that was true then and is still true today, there is a lot of non-classified information that does not seem important. But if it is collected routinely it can give a picture of organizational changes and new priorities. Back in the Dark Ages this was commonly a phone directory.
Since precisely when is El Reg "The Reg"? If part of the new design involves changing how El Reg refers to itself, I take back precisely everything nice I've said about it. What's next, are we going to lose our measurement system?
I don't like it.
Gov agencies got low on their stockpile of cyber, due to recent leaks.
There are a handful of companies and men out there who know how to develop them.
They should talk to their local military ally branch and sign a contract, funding them, in short term.
>81 per cent received no money for their services
Why would someone work for free? Even working for your own country, you need to get paid - I believe that's called capitalism. If doing something others cannot easily do, you need to be well-paid.
>and 94 per cent went to prison
I strongly doubt this numbers.
...so all the stats are rubbish then!
If you can assert that 94% went to prison, then that's of KNOWN bad actors.
Since it is impossible to quantify what you do not know, ALL these stats are snakeoil.
As seems to be usual course in the land of the free - we don't want you to realise what's really going on so we'll Blind You With Stats that will get quoted out of context and make things seem safe...
Pretty Much Every USA Election Campaign?
Two US senators have gone public with evidence of what they assert is a previously secret bulk data collection effort by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), conducted outside the law and without oversight.
Democratic Senators Ron Wyden and Martin Heinrich, of Oregon and New Mexico respectively, on Thursday announced that in April 2021 they sent a co-signed letter [PDF] to director of national intelligence Avril Haines and CIA director William Burns, seeking expedited declassification of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board's (PCLOB) review of two CIA counterterrorism programs – named "Deep Dive I" and "Deep Dive II".
The Deep Dives were made possible by Executive Order 12333 – a Reagan-era order that allows widespread data collection, and data-sharing with the CIA, in the name of national security.
Surveillance laws permitting GCHQ to operate its Tempora dragnet mass surveillance system broke the law, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled.
The judgment, handed down this morning in Strasbourg, vindicates the Edward Snowden revelations of 2013. The former NSA contractor revealed that Western spy agencies had been largely ignoring legal controls on their operations because, at the time, indiscriminate dragnet surveillance was more convenient than obeying the law.
Today’s ruling confirms that dragnet surveillance is not against the European Convention on Human Rights per se, provided that properly enforced safeguards to minimise indiscriminate spying are in force – and this is where UK.gov’s arguments fell apart.
The US government's Department of Justice has won its multi-million-dollar claim to Edward Snowden's Permanent Record book royalties as well as any future related earnings.
A federal district court in eastern Virginia this week ruled that Uncle Sam was entitled to the proceeds of Snowden's bestseller, an estimated $5.2m, and "any further monies, royalties, or other financial advantages derived by Snowden from Permanent Record." It can also grab Snowden's appearance fees from 56 speeches, thought to exceed $1m.
The court came to this conclusion after deciding Snowden broke his non-disclosure agreements with the NSA and CIA. It noted the super-leaker did not offer up his book for a review by official censors nor did he clear speeches on intelligence matters with the US government as required by his employment contract from the time he worked for Uncle Sam.
Russia has apparently given super-leaker and former NSA sysadmin Edward Snowden de facto permanent residence.
State-owned newswire TASS on Thursday reported that Snowden’s lawyer, a chap named Anatoly Kucherena, dropped in to tell it that Snowden has been granted an “open-ended residence permit”.
Snowden was granted a three-year residency permit in 2014, then offered a three-year extension.
Edward Snowden has brought in a healthy $1.25m in speaking fees ever since he jumped on a plane to Hong Kong with a treasure trove of NSA secrets, a new court filing [PDF] has revealed.
The whistleblower, who exposed mass surveillance of American citizens and foreigners by the US government by handing over top-secret documents to journalists before escaping to Moscow, earns an average of $18,745 per engagement. And Uncle Sam wants it – all of it.
The Feds subpoenaed Snowden’s booking agent, American Program Bureau, based in Massachusetts, insisting on a full rundown of engagements it had booked him for. The prosecution has added the list of 67 speeches, complete with fees and clients, to its lawsuit seeking to strip Snowden of any money earned through his actions.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled [PDF] that the National Security Agency's phone-call slurping was indeed naughty, seven years after former contractor Edward Snowden blew the whistle on the tawdry affair.
The ruling had nothing to do with Snowden himself. Instead it concerned four Somali nationals convicted of funneling funds to terrorist organisations in 2013.
It's been a long time coming, and while some might view the decision as a slap for officials that defended the practice, the three-judge panel said the part played by the NSA programme wasn't sufficient to undermine the convictions of four individuals for conspiring to send funds to Somalia in support of a terrorist group.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022