back to article The strange tale of an energy biz that suddenly became a blockchain upstart – and $1.4m now forfeited in sold shares

America's financial watchdog, the SEC, has accused two men of illegally banking $1.4m by selling shares in the bafflingly renamed "blockchain" startup UBI Blockchain. The pair today agreed to hand back the alleged ill-gotten gains, plus cough up nearly $200,000 in fines. Essentially, it is claimed, they profited by selling …

  1. Jay Lenovo
    Paris Hilton

    25 Thousand Dollar Pyramid Scheme


    Things you uh.., THINGS YOU THROW MONEY AT !!!!

    1. MiguelC Silver badge

      Re: 25 Thousand Dollar Pyramid Scheme

      Don't forget VR (and DevOps?)...

  2. vtcodger Silver badge

    The SEC is going to come after me because I renamed my taco truck "Blockchain Burgers"?

    Now you tell me.

    Looks like I'm out the cost of a paint job.

    1. BebopWeBop Silver badge

      I would be inclined to suspect that (in the UK at least) 'vurtual burgers' might get you called out by Trading Standards

      1. m0rt

        Not if he doesn't give them real burgers for their money. He just sends an email with a picture of a burger on it to customers.

        1. Michael Wojcik Silver badge

          Not if he doesn't give them real burgers for their money.

          Does anyone in the UK sell reall burgers?

    2. This post has been deleted by its author

  3. Nick Kew

    An energy company playing fantasy finance?

    So Enron wasn't a one-off, but a tradition!

    1. Cuddles Silver badge

      "An energy company playing fantasy finance?"

      From the description, it doesn't sound like they were actually an energy company. They just threw out a bunch of buzzwords in the hopes that people would throw money at them :

      "The Company was in the business of designing modular, self-contained, fully automated, climate controlled units for distributed production of energy.

      The Company manufactures micro-production solutions that may be implemented in a range of contexts, from ethanol micro-production facilities to urban greenhouse gardens to third-world farming communities. The Company has not generated any revenues."

      As far as I can tell, they've never made or sold a single product, all they've done is shuffled shares around and play with their name. Given how long it's been going, I'd be inclined to suspect money laundering or something rather than just being a straight investment scam, but there's certainly never been anything legitimate about it. It's not an energy company playing fantasy finance, it's just a fraud playing around with different kinds of fraud.

      1. Rich 11 Silver badge

        ethanol micro-production facilities

        I've worked on a few of those in my time, usually setting one up in the airing cupboard before moving it to the cellar.

      2. Frank Bitterlich

        "Free Energy" maybe?

        To me, it looks like the energy generated comes in the form of hot air...

  4. jmch Silver badge

    I'm curious... to why the SEC restricted the price they could sell the stock at in the first place. Surely any private transaction between buyer and seller, at a price that the buyer is willing to pay, and with full disclosure on part of the seller* about what they are selling, is legal in a modern open economy?

    I'm guessing that the clue is that they were paid for legal work in "Class A restricted stock", but that does not make it any clearer, since stock classes and any restrictions on them are defined by the company, there is no generic stock classes and/or restrictions defined by the SEC.

    So, anyone know what gives?

    *A listed company is obliged to divulge certain financial and business information to the public so the public can make informed investment decisions. Companies and their directors can be fined/imprisoned for wrongful disclosure, so buying stock of a listed company it is assumed that the buyer knows** what they are buying into.

    **even if they don't and are just seeing 'blockchain' in the name

  5. Tuesday Is Soylent Green Day

    Where have we seen this before?

    The people throwing money at anything with blockchain in the name are probably the descendants of the ones who, 20 years ago, threw money at anything with dotcom in the name.

  6. Pascal Monett Silver badge

    "an unnamed Hong Kong resident"

    Now that there is something that intrigues me. Especially the part where this mystery guy not only buys nearly all the shares, but then somehow is able to move the company to another part of the US. Just how did he know to put the company there and for what purpose ?

    Where there communications between the pair and that guy to set all this up in the first place ? Because if not, I can't imagine some random guy in Hong Kong buying up a company in the US would care about moving it to some other place he almost certainly doesn't know either.

    There's something fishy there.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: "an unnamed Hong Kong resident"

      It's likely the hong kong resident already had another business operating from delaware or it may be something similar to registered offices for UK companies.

      the registered office does not have to be where the company trades from, just somewhere where any documents delivered will reach an official within the company, it's quite common for the address used to be the address of an accountant who is also the company secretary

      1. Mike Moyle Silver badge

        Re: "an unnamed Hong Kong resident"

        Delaware is the second-smallest (by land area) state in the U.S. Thus, they hit on the idea of making really easy incorporation their main cash crop. It's not uncommon at all to see the note "A Delaware corporation" in small print on a company's ads or website.

        Here's a brief spot to give you an idea of the scale:

    2. Eddy Ito

      Re: "an unnamed Hong Kong resident"

      Delaware is where many companies reside simply because it offers a better business climate than most other states as some are downright byzantine and that's especially true for publicly traded companies. If I remember the statistic correctly it's something like half of publicly traded U.S. companies are registered in Delaware so it's likely easier to find people to handle the paperwork.

  7. Giovani Tapini Silver badge


    [a suite of modular, self-contained, fully automated, climate controlled units for distributed production of energy.]

    A climate controlled unit for the production of energy must mean solar panels. Another group of companies where it's hard to find a legitimate one.

    Agree with posts above, it's probably money laundering, or some other fraudulent or near fraudulent activity.

    1. I ain't Spartacus Gold badge

      Re: WTF

      Surely climate controlled power generation could be a wind turbine.

      Or, looked at another way, a giant coal fired power plant controls (effects) the climate.

      1. Terry 6 Silver badge

        Re: WTF

        "climate controlled power generation" could just as easily mean they have a thermostat to control the output from a steam engine turning a turbine. iow Bugger All!

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020