If I didn't already have electricity in my shed, I 100% would buy this... Big thumbs up to them :)
Grab your lamp, you've pulled: Brits punt life-saving gravity-powered light
The second generation of a deciwatt gravity-powered lamp designed by the British industrial designers behind the Psion computer keyboard was launched today. Few innovations we cover can claim to save lives, but this just might be one of them. The $5 Gravity Light, designed by London's Therefore Inc, offers the world's poorest …
COMMENTS
-
Tuesday 1st May 2018 12:47 GMT Anonymous Coward
Obligatory facetious comment
one minute of pulling generates one hour of light at 25lm
They should develop a miniature reciprocating generator that fits a gentleman's wrist. A leisurely "workout" of five minutes would be good exercise, and provide five hours illumination (or two hours after netting off a USB powered screen displaying "encouragement").
Waste no want not. And I'm sure the "spendings" can be recycled in some form.
-
-
Tuesday 1st May 2018 13:10 GMT Kaltern
I know.. I'm deeply hurt and upset.. I might have to ... actually I really don't care... someone always downvotes my comments. Perhaps my charm, wit and astounding linguistic skills are just inciting immense amounts of jealousy, causing an irrational need to downvote me, and others like me, to give this person the feeling of power and importance, all the while withering away in their basement room, with only a single light bulb and a bear called Terry for company.
Or they're bored. Whichever works...
-
-
Tuesday 1st May 2018 13:18 GMT Chris G
Gravity?
I don't see where this is gravity powered, from reading the article it requires a human to provide power by pulling the belt that runs through the device.
From the article's title I had pictured something like the old Cuckoo Clock weights operating a dynamo.
The lamp is certainly worth having for emergencies but it doesn't seem to be gravity powered.
Using a weight system with a dynamo might make an interesting project for my shed however.
Edit: Just found this from 2015: The Diddly Wail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3100777/The-light-powered-GRAVITY-Lamp-uses-energy-falling-weight-illuminate-homes-without-electricity.html
-
-
Tuesday 1st May 2018 14:05 GMT Chris G
Re: Gravity?
In the Wail link I found it is using a 26lb weight, so not for the old and frail, I suppose a similar way to use gravity would be to re-invent the waterclock/wheel fill a tank with water and let the outlet power a tiny dynamo to light a LED, then you just need a hose or plumb it in, unless you are in a 3rd world place with no plumbing or plentiful water.
-
Tuesday 1st May 2018 15:33 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Gravity?
"[...] unless you are in a 3rd world place with no plumbing or plentiful water."
They fetch water in a large container from a communal supply only a few times a day. If they then stored it temporarily in a high cistern - they could have electricity generated as they gradually drained the tank.
-
-
-
Tuesday 1st May 2018 13:35 GMT Mage
Re: Gravity?
Yes, Gravity Powered is *like* perpetual motion. It's human powered. No doubt a weight is cheaper than a spring. Or just having a rechargeable cell.
There is a pendulum that looks like it's gravity powered, or a perpetual motion machine. It's driven by the Earth's rotation. I presume a LOT of BIG ones would slow down the rotation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
Thermodynamics. No free lunch.
There is no reason why an old weight or spring driven mechanism can't be used to drive an LED. Though please don't dismember record player or mecanno motors to make one. Or other than mass produced clocks/music boxes.
I think some music boxes (see eBay for new cheap mechanisms) could provide enough LED to read for a few minutes?
Or what about arm and leg "irons" that crank a spring with a clutch that drives motor to charge your phone?
-
Tuesday 1st May 2018 16:25 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Gravity?
There is a pendulum that looks like it's gravity powered, or a perpetual motion machine. It's driven by the Earth's rotation. I presume a LOT of BIG ones would slow down the rotation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
Foucault's Pendulum is not powered by Earth's rotation. As the wikipedia page says:
Air resistance damps the oscillation, so some Foucault pendulums in museums incorporate an electromagnetic or other drive to keep the bob swinging; others are restarted regularly, sometimes with a launching ceremony as an added attraction.
-
Tuesday 1st May 2018 20:20 GMT Mage
Re: Gravity?
Put it in a vacuum.
Actually an inertial guidance system platform "appears" to rotate if you are parked. It's actually the Earth is rotating and the platform remains pointing where ever it was pointing at the start. Modern ones don't use three flywheels but mem elements like in a mobile phone.
The electromagnetic drive does NOT power the movement, only cancels the air resistance.
Inertial guidance is much simpler on a spacecraft that's not in orbit than on a ship, aircraft or cruise missile which has to compensate for the Earth's rotation.
-
Wednesday 2nd May 2018 10:37 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Gravity?
But the point was about "perpetual motion". A rotating disk will continue to rotate indefinitely in the absence of friction too.
The thing about FP is that you launch it in a straight line, but it precesses due to the earth's rotation. Most obviously, if you swing a pendulum at the north pole, the earth will turn underneath it.
That's still not any form of "perpetual motion"; it's just that a pendulum would be expected to swing back and forth in a straight line, but apparently does not. That's because you're not in an intertial frame of reference.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wednesday 2nd May 2018 04:21 GMT I3N
Dry sand flows better than water ...
One that would LAST in the desert ... blasted dust gets into everything ... gums up bearings and coats the insides of equipment everywhere ...such is boffin life in a mud building armed with air hose and vacuum cleaner ...
Expect the obligatory downvotes ...
-
-
Wednesday 2nd May 2018 10:53 GMT Arthur the cat
Re: Dry sand flows better than water ...
I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating and it gets everywhere
One of the more interesting statistics I remember from the first Gulf War was that the biggest single cause of soldiers being medevac'ed out was emergency circumcision due to problems caused by sand.
I'm not sure whether there's a suitable icon for this.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tuesday 1st May 2018 14:37 GMT Rol
Where there's muck there's.....
Electricity!
A friend of mine, some time ago did a bit of work on self fuelling robots. Basically. they would seek out a food source to ingest, which would then be turned into electricity via their artificial stomach.
I was very much hoping that that technology would have advanced to the stage I could take my toilet off-line and reduce my sewage charge to zero, while converting my effluent into electricity and probably some kind of briquette, that I could either burn or sell to kids as cinder toffee.
-
Tuesday 1st May 2018 15:41 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: Where there's muck there's.....
"[...] and reduce my sewage charge to zero, while converting my effluent into electricity [...]"
Bill Gates is financing research. Here is a video of a microwave/plasma destructor that would be self-powered.
-
Wednesday 2nd May 2018 09:19 GMT MrXavia
Re: Where there's muck there's.....
I remember watching a program on while in China about something like this, it used the animal waste to create enough gas to burn to cook on every day. I can't remember the details, but it was impressive that they could generate that much methane gas daily just from a single households waste!
-
-
-
Wednesday 2nd May 2018 08:25 GMT Anonymous Coward
Re: When there's no more magic left it's time to stop.
Precisely. The wind up radio is good for an hour on a couple minutes of winding. This light is just the same idea used for lighting, so nothing new here.
I'm a Yank and I've actually used Trevor's radio, yet a whole bunch of Brits seem not to know about him, a fellow Brit. Odd.
-
-
Wednesday 2nd May 2018 09:23 GMT joshimitsu
Retail should be around £20-£30?
For that price, are the early adopters subsidising free/discounted units for needy causes? (on top of the buy one/donate some scheme). Or it that going to the R&D element?
What's the advantage over the crank style ones anyway? I thought the "pull the chain" style mechanisms are suited to opening heavy doors/shutters etc, is this due to the dynamo having higher resistance?
I think the belt would wear out after a few years, like the drive belt in a scooter so there's still a maintenance element.
-
Wednesday 2nd May 2018 10:30 GMT JohnLH
So that's 12 Kg x 2 metres x 10 (approx value for g) = 240 joules = 4 watt minutes. Not a lot of power for very long when you've just lifted 12 bags of sugar. No wonder they need a solar panel and battery to make this sensible. This is just the kind of patronising "innovation" we don't need.
-
Wednesday 2nd May 2018 12:43 GMT Jtom
I like the simplicity of the idea, but can't help thinking they are going off-track with solar and batteries. The users don't need added complexity, and they don't have money. What they have is manpower.
Depending on the natural resources available (sand, water, dirt, rocks, wood) and terrain (flat vs hills), I suspect this concept could be ramped up to a much larger scale using manpower. Consider a desert-like condition. Sand could be used as the weight. Instead of manually pulling a large weight to 'wind' the magneto, they could have something as simple as a fire brigade to transport the sand bucket-by-bucket up to a large container. The container, itself, could descend, creating the power (and raised back up after being emptied), or could empty into a verticle conveyor belt of smaller buckets, providing continuous downward drop. Simple machines (fulcrum-lever, Archimedes screw, slopes, wheelbarrows) could be used as appropriate. Anything could be used for the weight, and coordinated manpower could be used to increase the scale. A small output could be generated for extremely long periods, or large outputs for shorter time-frames.
To me, eliminating manpower by adding expenses and technology (batteries, solar panels, etc.) is exactly the wrong trade-off.
-
Friday 4th May 2018 23:37 GMT Anonymous Coward
So I'm in but when you can get an 'Outdoor 20W Multifunction Portable Manual Crank Generator Emergency Survival Power Supply' for 30USD and presumably pair it with a Lithium iron phosphate battery of your choosing it doesn't seem like great value for money. I'm not an expert in battery technology but presumably the battery is the star of the show in that it's not particularly picky on voltage input and will charge at anything from 3-20v?