The Adpocalypse problem wasn't so much that YouTube stopped funding 'edgy' videos, it's that they attempted to stop funding terrorists in a cack-handed fashion that pretty much maximised the impact on YouTube's content creators, edgy or otherwise.
The system flagged a lot of videos incorrectly (based on how frequently they'd be re-monetised on appeal), but the system did not compensate for the incorrect flagging - the revenue lost in the few days the appeal took represented most of the traffic videos get. They system never provided any feedback on why videos were being demonetised - not at point-of-demonitisation, and not in the appeal process.
The current system still incorrectly flags a lot of content, but they've set it up so you can upload your video ahead of publishing it, so you can appeal any rating before the video goes live, so before those critical few days when your video is new and (potentially) #trending. That's a good start, but their algorithms are clearly not working terribly well, and remain utterly opaque to the creators.