back to article Sack the Xerox CEO 'immediately', yell activist investors

Activist investors Carl Icahn and Darwin Deacon are linking arms to force Xerox to “explore strategic alternatives” for the business and squeeze out the “old guard” manning the fort should they resist change. Icahn and Darwin collectively own 40 million shares in photocopier and print giant Xerox - equating to a 15 per cent …

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Carl Icahn involved....

    things can only go well.

    So long Xerox.

  2. hammarbtyp

    Usual suspects

    CEO Jeff Jacobson, a member of the Xerox “old guard”, is incapable of creating long-term value for Xerox shareholders short term profit for Icahn and should be replaced immediately:

    Fixed it for ya!

    1. Alistair

      Re: Usual suspects


      Only one upvote to provide. Rallying the troops for more I hope.

    2. Someone Else Silver badge

      Re: Usual suspects

      I dunno: According to the NYSE, Xerox has gone from a 52 week low of 26.48 to a 52-week high of 34.13. Now, my math is a bit rusty, but according to my calculations,that's a 56% increase in stock value n the 52 week period. That should be good enough for anybody, except, of course, for Carl Ichanfuckupanycompanyicangetmyhandson. (I wish my portfolio did as well!).

  3. Hollerithevo

    Back seat driver

    Until Ichan has been making day-to-day strategic decisions for a few years at Xerox, his is only an opinionated observer's view. I can recommend all sorts of solutions and plans for growth for Fortune 500 companies, but until i really know what they are up against, my views, and icahn's, are so much smog.

    1. Alistair

      Re: Back seat driver

      @ Hollerithevo:

      Until Ichan has been making day-to-day strategic decisions for a few years

      Icahn *has* been making day to day strategic decisions for quite a number of years. The issue with Idiotcahn is that the only strategy he knows is outsource, sell off, gut and line pocket. This has s&^t to do with creating long term value for a shareholder.

    2. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

      Re: Back seat driver

      "his is only an opinionated observer's view"

      And boy, is he opinionated!

      It's quite simple. If he knows how to run a photocopying (or anything else) company better than anyone else why doesn't he just do a start-up, put his own money into it and run it himself. I'm sure we'll all follow the results with interest.

  4. Philippe

    There is no old guard left

    I have been following Xerox for a number of years as a customer.

    The entire old guard has gone, the technology comes from companies bought along the road or the Fuji partnership.

    Icahn has a personal vendetta against Jacobson and his advice isn’t worth anything.

    Xerox should consider merging with another equipment manufacturer to survive, and Jacobson having been close to 6 years in charge, is the one to make it happen.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: There is no old guard left

      "Icahn has a personal vendetta against Jacobson and his advice isn’t worth anything."

      No, he has a personal vendetta against long term investment.

      1. Aitor 1 Silver badge

        Re: There is no old guard left

        That is legal.. he buys big chunks in companies that have a low market value and their assets are worth more than the shares.. to procede to gut it and sell the parts.. so yeah, he is against long term investment.. as that goes against his objectives.

    2. Barry Rueger

      Re: There is no old guard left

      Maybe Xerox is still a force in some corporate settings, but on reading this story it struck me that it's been years (at least) since I thought of Xerox, much less saw a Xerox branded product.

      I just assumed they were yet another company that used to be legendary, and a corporate behemoth, that had been clobbered by their own corporate ego while competitors adapted to and redefined the market.

      Right I'm trying to think of one of the major 70s or 80s tech giants that still dominates an industry, and I come up blank.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: There is no old guard left

        Ironically, Apple as a phoenix?

        But yes, I agree, most fail to self cannibalise and miss the coming disruptions as they tie themselves to the Wall Street quarterly inspection that leaves no room for multi year change.

        Xerox missed so much opportunity (I'm a former Xeroid), even in the internet boom days. Paralysed by a fear of moving away from the "click" and KPIs that reinforced a 1980s model, even the 2000s

  5. macjules Silver badge

    Sure I read that somewhere else ..

    The Xerox Board of Directors and management are confident with the strategic direction in which the company is heading and we will continue to take action to achieve our common goal of creating value for all Xerox shareholders.

    That sounds like it was copied from somewhere.

  6. Peter Clarke 1

    Follow the Money

    Is Icahn already eyeing up where his cash from the new tax rates is going?? Making America Great Again, eh?

  7. spold Silver badge


    Make some copies of him - maybe one will be better.

    1. Someone Else Silver badge

      Re: Solution

      No, they'be just slightly smaller.

  8. ecofeco Silver badge

    How the mighty have fallen

    Xerox is another one of those great examples of how business school/insider/good ol boys executives run a company into the ground.

    Once the great innovator and brand to be reckoned with, it is now just a shell of its former self.

    The list is long.

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward


  10. Erik4872

    Aren't they just a BPO outfit now?

    My experience with Xerox these days is just as a business process outsourcer for governments and big companies. For example, they are the ones who administer the red light camera program where I live. All they're doing in that outfit is collecting a percentage of fines paid and hiring a few "needful-doers" to man the cameras and respond to complaints.

    I know they still make copiers and printers, but even those are just physical extensions of the BPO organization these days.

  11. Someone Else Silver badge

    "Activist Investor" is short for...

    ...dumber-than-soup, greedy-assed, coke-snorting, ADHD-addled, know-nothing rat bastard fuckhead who, in a self-medicated haze, thinks he (and it's always a 'he") knows how to run a given company better than the hard-working folks who made the company profitable int he first place.

    And then there's Carl Ichan.

    Carl! Bubby!! Can you say "Trans World Airlines"? I knew you could....

    1. macjules Silver badge

      Re: "Activist Investor" is short for...

      Thought it was short for Icahnhascheeseburger

    2. Mark 85 Silver badge

      Re: "Activist Investor" is short for...

      I upvoted you for restraint. Now tell us how you really feel. Those of us who have been around for awhile will probably agree in force and upvote that one also. Ichan should be taken out back and stood against the wall for all the good he does for anyone other than himself.

      1. Someone Else Silver badge

        @Mark 85 -- Re: "Activist Investor" is short for...

        If I were to state how I really felt about that scum-sucking doucebag, I'd get hauled away in a frothing rage. Let me put it this way: Fuckers like Carl Ichanhascheezburger (thanks, macjules, I liked that!) make Martin Shkreli look like paragons of human virtue.

        Oh, and one other thing. Taking him out back and shooting him is way to kind an outcome for him. He should be take out back, and each one of the folks who lost their job as a result of his insatiable greed and hubris be allowed to knee-cap him.

    3. hoola Silver badge

      Re: "Activist Investor" is short for...

      Spot on, "Active Investor" is just a way of making total scum-bags appear respectable.

  12. rbf

    Corporate Kool-aid

    Xerox has been drinking it for decades since before I joined up in 1990 or so, and got downsized in 2K - awards and commendations notwithstanding.

    What bothered me was that Xerox would happily invent a software technology, market it to customers for several years - and then walk away from it leaving customers to replace or rebuild applications from scratch.

    The successful copier salespeople rose to executive ranks without ever understanding the importance of software in the high volume printing data center environment.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Corporate Kool-aid

      I was recruited and worked in the DocuShare Business Unit. We innovated and grew the business taking out ECM giants Documentum, OpenText and others left and right. We tried to work with core Xerox Copier BU to create biz solutions around automation. We were treated like nothing and all the talent we had eventually left... A LARGE missed opportunity. I did not want to leave but we really had no choice...

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like

  • Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway buys 11.4% stake in HP
    Even notoriously tech averse stock market gambler can't resist piece of pandemic-boosted PC extravaganza

    Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has taken up a double-digit stake in PC and print biz HP Inc's stock worth about $4.2 billion, a move that sent the company's share price up by 10 percent.

    The purchase, confirmed in a SEC filing by the investment vehicle on 6 April, saw roughly 121 million HP shares shift over to the new owner in what can be seen as a vote of confidence in the residual value of HP. This equates to a circa 11.4 percent ownership of the company.

    "Berkshire Hathaway is one of the world's most respected investors and we welcome them as an investor in HP," the world's largest printer and second largest PC brand said.

    Continue reading
  • Co-inventor of Ethernet David Boggs dies aged 71
    You couldn't read this article online without using his network tech

    David Boggs, a computer networking pioneer best-known for co-inventing Ethernet, has died. He was 71.

    Born in Washington DC on June 17, 1950, Boggs as a child liked to tinker with ham radios and was an amateur radio operator. He went on to study electrical engineering at Princeton University, and graduated in 1972. His big break came a year later, when he joined Xerox PARC, the legendary research lab that developed the basis of modern computing concepts, from laser printing and object-oriented programming to WYSIWYG editing and a graphical user interface that we would recognize today.

    In among these technologies was Ethernet, which was created by Boggs and his colleague Robert Metcalfe.

    Continue reading
  • Imagine a world where Apple shacked up with Xerox in the '80s: How might it look today?
    An alternative history of the computer revolution

    Feature Today our columnist Mark Pesce considers what would have happened had Apple and Xerox partnered in the 1980s. Is this how the history of the microcomputer revolution would have panned out? We present the following fiction.

    Looking back over the last 40 years of computing, it's hard to imagine how things could have been different. When Steve Jobs travelled up the Valley in late 1979 to visit Xerox PARC, he found the missing piece of the puzzle that had eaten away at him ever since Woz hacked together the first Apple I: how to make a computer that everyone could use.

    The genius computer scientists at PARC had solved that problem with WIMP: windows, icons, menus, pointer. Add in a high-resolution display, an operating system built upon components written in the spiffy object-oriented Smalltalk programming language, plus a high-speed network interface to connect all of the systems together, and, well, that's pretty much all of modern computing, even today.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022