Seems....
...rather pointless if you can't use the keyboard on the device. Looks like they are releasing a full size, fully working version in 2018. Maybe wait till then to see if the keyboard actually works on the full size version.
The Commodore 64 is coming back, in a form that owes a debt to both Nintendo's shrunken Mini SNES and thee Vega+ Sinclair ZX Spectrum reboot. The due-in-early 2018 “C64 Mini” matches Nintendo's plan to shrink an old machine, in this case by 50 per cent. Like the Mini and the Vega+ the revived Commodore will pack in pre-loaded …
Yeah can't say I am a fan of most modern keyboards either. Picked myself up a nice mechanical one off the interwebs. Feels much nicer to use and is a LOT more satisfying if you're having a typed out rant-o-gram :)
I picked up a post modern keyboard a few years ago, it was crap. Every key just typed 'Y' and after 6 months it gave up with a disenfranchised sigh.
+1 for the old IBM keyboards. I wrote my undergraduate project on an ancient IBM AT using Word Perfect. It was, erm.... military surplus shall we say. 25,000 words, all done over the easter holidays. No diagrams. When you got up a head of steam on those keyboards, you really felt like you were getting somewhere. A keyboard that gave you the "I'm king of the world!" from Titanic feeling, when you got up to a decent WPM. Modern keyboards? Utter bollocks unless you are prepared to pay a fortune.
I still use an IBM model M, manufactured in Greenock on 29-04-1997 according to the label. PN 1391406, SN 1234565. Unfortunately it has a UK keymap and I am now in Oz so could do with a US one.
I keep looking at Unicomp to get a modern version with a USB interface and a Windows key, but they don't seem to have an Aussie disty and shipping from the US to Oz costs more then the keyboard.
Interesting, are US keyboards the standard/default in Australia?
Even though I’m in the UK, I prefer the US keyboard layout myself. All of the symbol keys are in much more logical locations, and it’s really not all that much of a hardship to type option+3 (or compose l-=) for when I do need a £ sign.
The first keyboards I used were American-layout ones from DEC. This formed strong brain connections so that I now always configure the layout US style, no matter what the symbols on the key caps say.
In fact, I have a DEC LK250 keyboard sitting in the corner. (From their "PC-compatible" box.) I have a large-DIN to small-DIN adapter, and an AT-to-USB converter, but it doesn't work reliably. I think it might be a power issue. Maybe a powered USB hub would help.
I got my Amstrad CPC down from the loft last year. It was great fun - for 10 minutes. Then the nostalgia wore off and it dawned on me how truly rubbish 80s machines are compared to now. Their saving grace is the ease of learning to program and getting to understand computers with BASIC (something thats sorely lacking today despite all the hype about python and scratch), but other than that I'm afraid I don't get this rush to buy clones of old machines especially given you can buy the real things on ebay relatively cheaply.
Still, I suppose its no different to people buying replicas of old cars and like replica cars there'll be a modern engine and running gear underneath. Wouldn't surprise me if its just a raspberry pi tucked into a corner running a C64 emulator with a nice price mark up for the gullible.
There you go - that's CPC's for you :P
Seriously though, if you learned to bash the C64 metal in 6510 assembly, that taught a lot of the underlying principles for playing with Arduinos and the like.
And the games were frankly more fun. And the SID chip..And $D011 raster effects that needed the exact amount of NOP's to work..
"There you go - that's CPC's for you :P"
Well, each to their own :P
One thing I will say about the CPC range is that AFAIK Locomotive BASIC was the only 1980s BASIC that could do a kind of limited co-operative multithreading using the AFTER/EVERY <msec> GOSUB <line> interrupt commands.
CPC was crap when it came out, believe me, I had to teach my mum how to use it one weekend - so she could teach some lecturers on Monday morning how to teach their students on Monday afternoon.
(Typical training centre balls-up).
I did at least get free photo copier privileges for my Star Fleet Battles addiction.
The nearest we have to a Nostalgia" icon.
"CPC was crap when it came out, believe me, I had to teach my mum how to use it one weekend - so she could teach some lecturers on Monday morning how to teach their students on Monday afternoon."
How do you teach someone BASIC to a level to be able to teach others in a weekend? Or was it more "Here's how you switch it on, he's how you put a tape/disk in and load a game"?
"CPC was crap when it came out"
I will have you know that I wrote a program to control the Seawolf missile system on a CPC 6128 in assembler, tested it off the Welsh coast on HMS Broadsword.
Oh what fun we had. Seawolf trial worked. But an Exocet trial failed due to the missile deciding at the last second that it didn't want to come out and play and just sat there even though its little hutch had opened. It sulked for 1/2 an hour before it was decided it had calmed down.
"But an Exocet trial failed due to the missile deciding at the last second that it didn't want to come out and play and just sat there even though its little hutch had opened. It sulked for 1/2 an hour before it was decided it had calmed down."
Did you also have a beach-ball alien on board?
The CPC is a well-designed machine — it's trivial to set yourself up with a full address range of RAM, pick any portion of that to be the size you want of video output, you've got the equal-highest resolution graphics of the era, one of the faster CPUs, a better-than-usual palette, great support for the disk drive machine (even if the disks are weird), and the BASIC is well-structured and provides good hardware support.
They don't all support interlacing, as Amstrad switched CRTC supplier a few times, but if you get one that does then you can output 1bpp graphics at a resolution slightly higher than DVD. If you bought the model that comes with a monitor, you can probably even see them all. Though you'll probably want the 128kb machine for that, as I count almost a full 64kb spent on such a frame buffer.
You only suffer because developers tended to treat it as that thing you hastily port your Spectrum game to in a couple of weeks somewhere near to the end of development ― as long as it sort of works, that'll do. So there's a vast library, but you need to be a little selective.
I'm sorry but a CPC is in my opinion possibly the worse of the 8 bit machines.
I can have lots of fun with the speccy, the C64 and MSX machines (running japanese software), but the CPC has to be the dullest machine ever made.
The basic on the MSX is great, and the full screen editor on the C64 is incredibly well designed for the time (although the basic is not very good as it lacks sound and graphics commands)
For assembler programs the C64 is ace with a cartridge running an ASM monitor.
But the CPC...
If you want to know which 8 bit computer is cool and funny, check the demoscene for it.
Batman Forever is both (i) the obligatory CPC demo of modern times; and (ii) the only good thing called 'Batman Forever'.
I have a real C64 in mint condition, boxed, that I'm going to put on eBay or somewhere. Guess it's just gone up in price :)
Offers on a postcard please...
I personally never used a C64, though my little brother did; my first was a Vic-20, because at college we had Commodore Pets. The Vic-20 was awful to use, mainly because its display was about 20 characters wide, which made it very difficult to do anything useful that was text-based. The Pet and C64 were somewhat more useful.
"I personally never used a C64, though my little brother did; my first was a Vic-20, because at college we had Commodore Pets. The Vic-20 was awful to use, mainly because its display was about 20 characters wide, which made it very difficult to do anything useful that was text-based. The Pet and C64 were somewhat more useful."
I was given a Vic 20 and discovered that the only difference between a Vic 20 and CBM 64 is the system board (and the case colour) and that a free Vic 20 plus an aftermarket replacement C64 system board was a LOT cheaper than a new C64,
Just pick up Vice and find yourself some rompacks on the Internet (there are plenty freely available thanks to retrogame websites) and after you did that you can soon play dozens of retro games free of charge.
Heck, I even managed to copy my Final Cartridge using a small basic program, send that to my PC and right now I'm using that image in Vice as well. The whole setup can really take me back to those good times :)
Seriously though: the graphics maybe far less than what we're currently used to, but some of the gameplay we had back then was really way ahead.
Commodore already did this with the Commodre 64GS.
It bombed. Why?
The games it came with needed a keyboard to operate. This is a pointless money making scheme. For £70 you could buy a C64 and play whatever games you want on it without a problem.
Essentially they are reducing home computers to games machines. Home computers were excellent toys to learn how computers worked. They had programming languages simple enough to fully learn in 2 weeks, they had hardware and "operating systems" easy enough so they could be fully understood by the determined hobbyist.
Compare that to the Raspberry Pi, which runs a highly complex operating system, on highly complex and only partially documented hardware. No single person can understand it and learn from it.
Maybe we should instead make a Commodore PET clone, with a small microcontroller running a 6052 emulator as the CPU and perhaps video output. That way we could have a machine again which would be understandable by everyone, yet powerful enough to do things.
"Although I agree Linux and Python are a bit of a mouthful to swallow at once compared to switching an 8bit on and typing "10 print 'hello world'"
That's why I'll be setting one up for my lad with RiscOS. BBC BASIC FTW!! And it's got enough poke to do big-boy stuff. And if he ever decides that's what takes his interest, there's an ARM assembler in the box too.
By the time he gets to that stage, a bit of Python and C shouldn't be beyond his grasp.
I'll even encourage my daughter to give it a bash. She has a very different mindset, though, so I'm not convinced it'll be her thing.
Maybe we should instead make a Commodore PET clone, with a small microcontroller running a 6052 emulator as the CPU and perhaps video output. That way we could have a machine again which would be understandable by everyone, yet powerful enough to do things.
...or even a 6502. Ah, the days of zero page addressing...
"Maplin Speech Synthesiser kit"
The one with the SP0256-AL2?
I remember seeing the circuit in the Maplin Magazine and buying the chip on its own (mine came from Tandy rather than Maplin) and connecting it to a parallel printer port. It was supposed to run from a 3.12MHz crystal - I made a VCO for mine and had a pot that I could adjust from super-low baritone to mickey-mouse soprano.
I guess that for many who are commented here they were "excellent toys to learn how computers worked" - but for many, many others they were just games machines.
They replaced consoles for some time probably because games were much easier to pirate - and maybe even because owning a personal computer had some "cool" factor, and parents saw them less as a pure game machine only.
It's no surprise later pure game consoles became a big market again.
"They replaced consoles for some time probably because games were much easier to pirate - and maybe even because owning a personal computer had some "cool" factor, and parents saw them less as a pure game machine only."
Main selling point. Parents wouldn't buy you a console (like, say an ATARI), but you could talk them into buying you a home computer for school work... Not that this was entirely untrue.
They were also remarkably better game machines. They were much better equipped. The games were simply much better. The games were also much more interesting. Didn't matter if they could be pirated or not.
Hell, that's true even now.
Did they actually ship them (Vega+) yet?
Very much not - retro-computers.co.uk
Just for clarification however - the team behind this C64 were involved in the original Vega (which did ship). They left RCL almost 18 months ago after falling out with the current management over the Vega+, including (amongst other things) whether they should be taking any salary until the product shipped. They believed they shouldn't, the current RCL lot disagreed and appear to have since wasted the entire IndieGoGo fund (half a million quid of investors money) on doing anything but delivering a finished product.
The URL I posted above makes for very interesting reading!
So you have a C64 shaped box with a pretend keyboard on it?
I could do that now by putting an emu on the pc behind my telly , and drawing a C64 keyboard on a shoebox in front of the telly.
Given the amount of hardware this thing requires it would have been better to recreate one of the classic joysticks of the time and build the whole thing into that with an hdmi plug on the end of a long lead.
Given the amount of hardware this thing requires it would have been better to recreate one of the classic joysticks of the time and build the whole thing into that with an hdmi plug on the end of a long lead.
Well actually, they did that.
Except the HDMI... need a TV with audio and video jacks.
Still have mine.
I was tempted to do this, but decided not to, the nostalgia just wasn't strong enough.
That depends. If they've licensed the FPGA C64 recreation that went into a TV-game joystick unit a while back, then the engineering's all done, and there's really very little work to do.
But if they're doing software emulation, then the whole beast of timing issues and inaccurate emulation raises its ugly head.
Games i loved on c64:
Wizball
Forbidden Forest
Gunship
Elite (although it was far slower on the c64 than the spectrum, especially when cargo + detritus)
Eddie Kidd (for a few goes. The 'Too Bad! I Hope You Like Hospital Food' splash screen took so long it was irritating. Too irritating.
Way of the Exploding Fist.
Falcon Patrol
R-Type
Bruce Lee
Loads more I can't bring to mind right now.
Its not clear to me what they are going to produce with that kickstarter , it looks like remastered ( c64? ) game on a cartridge, requiring an original C64 to play?
Surely they'd have more success relewasing on Android and/or PC? or xbox?
...or is that not following the dream?
or did a read it wrong?
Ah , I see , it *is* in C64 format , and allowances are made for those weirdos that dont have an actual C64 available.
"The Game – Digital Edition [£15] If you don’t have a C64 or prefer to get your retro fix via emulation, this is the pledge for you. We’ll send you a digital version of the game, digital manual, cover art wallpapers (various resolutions), and a digital copy of Thirty One."
Actually this was crowdfunded at https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the64-computer-and-games-console.
It followed the usual path of delays, changes, dissapoointments, lack of updates from which they've now seem to have recovered (this actually needs a Phoenix rising from the ashes icon).
The original indiegogo products are still delayed but at least they have promised that original backers will receive the C64 mini.
Started on a Vic 20 with a 300Baud accoustic coupler modem mounted in the joystick port.
Went to a C64 with a pair of 1541s, a pair of 1581s, a 1750REU with maxed out RAM, a 56Kb FastCart attached external Hayes modem (in a purple housing), and a six slot expansion module off the back so I could use a simple DIP Switch to swap between which cartridge was active.
Upgraded to a 128D, moved all the aforementioned 64 kit over, & was happily writing reports, doing my taxes, using CompuServ & BBS', playing games, writing BASIC programs, & getting stuff done while my friends were all struggling with IRQ's on their IBM PC clones. "While you're trying to figure out how to get that bit to work at all, I've already got mine running, ready to Work, & waiting smugly for ME to get off my ass. Have fun with that IBM, I'm going to Get Shit Done now!"
*Cough*
If I still had my old C64/128D setup I'd probably have figured out how to get it to play Crysis.
=-)p
A lot of promises here. I am tired of people taking the "retro" community for granted and for a ride. Anyone who has access to a real C64 and hardware (that is, anyone with access to eBay or Craigslist) already has what they need to have a good old time with the machine. The HDMI port might be the only useful thing about The64, in particular since so many of the cheap S-Video/Composite-to-HDMI adapters cannot sync to the 240p signal output by the VIC-II and other chips of the era including those in the TI-99/4-series and Atari 8-bits. There are a few which do but it is a crap-shoot, though I over-came with a shiny Onkyo TX-NR656 which does a fairly good job with up-scaling the old systems, including Sega Genesis and original NES.
Disks are not an issue, either. If you have a PC and one of the many models of XU-1541 then you can use a real drive and real disks. Or pick up one of the SD2IEC variants and put your disk images on an SD card. Grab the TOSEC for Commodore 64 via Archive.org, as well as a number of really awesome new games available around the webs.
Or, as another has stated, grab Vice and run a nicely-equipped Commodore 64 (or 128, or VIC-20, etc.) on virtually any platform. Frodo is another which works well for cross-platform emulation -- anyone still run PalmOS or WebOS?
Point being, the Commodore community at large, IMNSHO, will pan this (actually, there are plenty of threads around in which this has already been panned, some with amazing vitriol.) I do not see the names of anyone recognized as modern pioneers on this project, at the very least Jeri Ellsworth who was responsible for the D64TV. Anyone with genuine interest, like those I have met at places like Vintage Computer Fest, will want their hands on the Real Deal(tm) and will get them.
This is hipster fodder. I call shenanigans on this whole damn page.