I believe the word we are all struggling to vocalise is ...
... dumbass.
A French national and suspected online drug dealer has been collared by US government agents – after he flew to America for the World Beard and Mustache Championships. Gal Vallerius, 38, was arrested on August 31 after he landed in the States to attend the contest. US Drug Enforcement Administration officials searched his …
If he was selling to France and the rest of Europe, why the hell did he supply anyone in the US?
If he hadn't done that he wouldn't have committed a crime in the US (I know this doesn't mean his details wouldn't have been passed back to Interpol etc.)
edit: after re-reading the article it doesn't state the US investigators ordered anything from this guy at all - so not sure what laws he's broken in the US?
If you carried $500,000 of dollar or euro bills across the border that you had earned from drug dealing, I think you would be arrested. No reason why bitcoins should be any different.
There's no law against carrying large amounts of money. They would have to be able to prove the money was from illegal activities to be able to arrest you, and even then unless you'd violated a law in the jurisdiction you're in at the time there's still nothing they can do about it. No reason why bitcoin should be any different.
This post has been deleted by its author
Technically true, even in the US.
In practise, untrue, especially in the US.
It's called Civil Forfeiture. It's abused heavily from the original intention (essentially it was mainly about confiscating dangerous weapons from hostile enemies in times of war). And abused even more heavily in the way it is currently implemented (especially in the US).
It goes like this. Cops pull over somebody for driving while black and come up with an excuse to search the car. Cops find large amount of cash. Cops immediately claim (with no plausible reason) that the cash is from drug deals and apply civil forfeiture. Guy is arrested, eventually ends up in court. Court finds there is no evidence he was ever involved in drug dealing, that the cash came from a totally legitimate source and he had a valid reason for having it on him: case dismissed.
And here's the clever bit: he doesn't get the cash back just because he's been exonerated. He has to file a civil suit to plead for his money back. It may be that all the money he has in the world was confiscated so he can't afford a lawyer. Tough titty. If he doesn't manage to prove he ought to have his money back the cops get to keep it (or at least a large percentage of it, with the rest going to fund the legal system as a whole) to buy new police cars 'n' guns 'n' stuff.
This is not theoretical. It has happened that way for decades. It still happens. A false anonymous accusation can lead to you losing everything you own. It's happened. More than once.
"If he was selling to France and the rest of Europe, why the hell did he supply anyone in the US?
"If he hadn't done that he wouldn't have committed a crime in the US"
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/94-166.pdf
The fun begins on p52.
"The fun begins on p52"
Check this bit out..
18 U.S.C. §7. Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction of theUnited States
The term “special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States”, as used in this title,
includes:
<snip>
(4) Any island, rock, or key containing deposits of guano, which may, at the discretion of the
President, be considered as appertaining to the United States
So by that logic, as the UK is an island and there is definitely guano here, then at the discretion of the US President he can deem the UK as a US Maritime jurisdiction.
US Law is a violation of all that is good in this world.
Aw come on now, there may be a few things wrong in the US but times have changed, they have chemical fertilizer factories now, and so I really don't think their Presidents are crazy about bird shit any more.
Bat shit crazy on the other hand...
Have you ever crossed the French border? No, I thought not, otherwise you wouldn't post such a stupid remark.
And no, I wouldn't care if French law actually did include something like you mention, in reality France is a free country - you know, freedom as in feel free, have a nice time, don't be an uncivilized, not the "American" freedom which means 'we reserve the right to shoot you, it is our manifest destiny'.
"Doubly stupid if you have something to hide."
Triply stupid if you're doing it for a beard competition.
- "Nice beard you got there, bud"
- "Thanks. Yours too. Not as nice as his, though"
- "Yeah, his is bushier. Give him a prize."
What sort of idiot takes electronic devices to the USA on a visit these days?
Someone so confident that he is really, really clever and won't ever be caught..
After all, he's got a business to run! He's really just an small-scale entrepaneur. Honest!
These competitions could only be improved if they all arrived clean shaven and then locked in a room with no food and water (but only CCTV) and then told to grow the best beard before being released.
That would sort out no end of social problems and clear the streets of a vast amount of knobheads.
Watch out, you're going to get a lot of down votes from people with sleeve tatoos and ripped jeans
It's also going to get votes from people who have beards and have done for a long time (early 90's in my case).
After all, why scrape your facial hair off? It hurts (even with a properly stropped cut-throat razor or one of those fancy multi-blade razors with 'built in lubricant'.). It's not the first one that hurts - it's all the subsequent ones.
And don't get me started on electric shavers - the only time I've ever had ingrowing facial hair (which hurts - a lot) was when I tried using an electric.
After that, I decided that facial hair was the way to go. It gets strimmed once a month or so to keep it short and vaguely presentable.
@CrazyOldCatMan
You waste your time strimming yours?
For many decades I resented the time and pain involved in shaving. In the two weeks' holiday around Xmas I luxuriated in not shaving. Until about the 12th or 13th day when the nascent beard started to itch intolerably. One year I figured out why it itched, persisted a few extra days and entered hirsute nirvana.
Having saved all that time and pain, I have no intention of investing extra time to keep it short and vaguely presentable. Plus there's another advantage: with a longer beard you no longer have to wear a tie.
The only disadvantage is chatting up women in the pub and persuading them that there's a velcro effect that means they won't have to clasp my head during cunnilingus. Later they kick me in the nuts because there's no such effect. You win some, you lose some.
Clearly a naughty boy, but what part of US law covers the sale and distribution of substances in Europe?
You clearly don't understand how US law works. It's basically impossible to get through a day without unknowingly committing a felony in the US. They've got an excuse to arrest anyone they damn well please here. Though, to be fair, most of those offenses would likely get thrown out via jury nullification.
It will be interesting to see how that holds up in court. I think we all know the reasoning is sound, but I'd expect his lawyer to request a jury trial and try to confuse a technologically clueless jury with alternative explanations for why he was found in possession of that key.
private keys that only the user could reasonably have.
....and half a million in BTC
..and test purchases made by US fuzz.
Yeah. Flimsy as fuck.
If that's all there you can guarantee there is absolute cast iron proof on that laptop. He's clearly the type of "techie" who thinks that tor = security.
Nothing in the article says any test purchases were made from this guy.
True. However ..
for the past year and a half, agents in the Sunshine State have been buying small quantities of drugs from the Dream Market, including 100 tabs of LSD, 11 tablets of hydrocodone and 28 grams of crystal meth.
Having established themselves as legit buyers on Dream Market, the g-men dug deeper and identified OxyMonster as a site kingpin.
In other words, the purchases were not directly from this guy, but they have established that the guy was certainly actively involved in the mechanics of this online market. Hence his arrest.
You can also see that expressed in the "probably cause" part of the filed PDF (page 4, points 6 & 7).
OK, the guy was an idiot, and not just for the hipster beard, but,
The indictment claimed Vallerius and OxyMonster both made repeated use of the word the word "cheers," the use of double exclamation marks, frequent use of quotation marks, and "intermittent French posts."
That is genuinely terrifying, and would apply to probably 25% of all Internet users. At least the British ones.
Quotation marks now brand you as a criminal.
So I can breathe easy because I never double exclamation marks, only ever use ' and not ", and intermittently post in German because my French is so dire it would make Arthur Bostrom wince.
Anyway, I thought murica automatically shot any foreigners with beards?
Quotation marks now brand you as a criminal.
Let's wait and see. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I would assume that the indictment presumably contains the reasons that the Feds believe there is a case to answer, and doesn't contain the detailed evidence that will form the basis of prosecution?
What we can see from the press reports of the indictment is that they've got reasonable grounds for believing he's been up to no good, and now they're chucking that to a court to decide. You can argue whether the court will give him a fair hearing separately, but procedurally this doesn't look unreasonable?
okay, let me check here... he had Bitcoin client installed. he had Tor installed. so far that now blankets a lot of users who may use crypto currency and want anonymous web browsing. nothing here.
he had the PGP crypto keys for OxyMonster - right, WHAT keys, just the public key? (which he'd have installed if he ever had dealings as a user/customer of OxyMonster rather than actually being a dealer)
or did he have the private key as well . (and now being in USA he will have to provide the secret passphrase for that key or face even longer jail time).
either way.....I'm wondering what laptop to take next time I travel..probably a brand new one with no useful/usual software installed as it its all 'used by criminals' (github, gpg, ssh, bitcoin, Tor, vpnc, ) :(
IIRC, a device with a fingerprint scanner is a lot safer as you cannot be forced to unlock the device.
1 - I'm not sure that is true. I know a PIN is protected, but FPs?
2 - you're there, and so is the device. It's easy to bring both together
3 - the FP readers on most devices suck badly, and that includes the one on iPhones. You have a shiny device which happily stores the required fingerprints for you, and it takes not that much effort to cook a fake finger from that so I don't think that's safe at all.
Ideally I'd like to have a device that still asks for a PIN or password after an FP, so that it either takes two passwords (as FP backup) or one FP plust maybe a shorter password to enter the device.
IIRC, a device with a fingerprint scanner is a lot safer as you cannot be forced to unlock the device.
Fingerprint readers are stupid easy to defeat. I mean they weren't exactly difficult to get around to begin with, and then the Mythbusters went and did a bit on them and showed the whole world multiple ways to fool them in the process. And this is the Mythbusters. Yeah, they're smart guys, but they're not exactly security experts. If they could do it with minimal effort how long do you think it's going to take someone who's job description includes knowing how to defeat security measures?
Fingerprint readers are stupid easy to defeat.
Not all of them. The difference is simple: the really good ones cost a lot more. For starters, a good FP reader tends to be in ridge format so you wipe out a residual print by default, but then there's method of pickup, resolution, the software behind it and the resulting repeatability versus tolerance, it's a long list.
That said, in the above situation you have no need for defeat activity, you have the actual human right there.
Yes, that was quite impressive. However, a good quality fingerprint reader won't be defeated that way - the main reason most devices use a low quality reader is because those are a lot cheaper and a failure to grant access is still deemed more of a concern than a failure to prevent unauthorised access.
I think it's a safe assumption that he had the private key. Despite rumors to the contrary the US authorities do know the difference. But aside from that I would imagine that they found BitCoin wallets known to belong to OxyMonster. You can rest assured that the brief summary of evidence in this article is far from a complete list of what they had against him.
either way.....I'm wondering what laptop to take next time I travel.
None.
If you go there on business, you get the receiving party to provide you with one. If it's a private visit just ask your friends/family over there to scrounge a not-too-shabby one off Craigslist/Cash Converters/charity shop/thrift store for the time you need it, after which they can sell it off (if they don't have a spare one around you can use).
It's not stated but (being online) one would assume the test purchases made by five-oh included delivery to the states.
It would be quite unlikely that in his 500k+ in transactions one or two weren't to the states.
They had all the evidence they needed to have a strong look at him, his own stupidity will provide them everything else they need going forwards. He walked into the country carrying it all, because he's an idiot who (like most criminals) think they are the smart type, that won't get caught.
He had, after all, done everything all the YouTube videos and forum posts told him to, he used TOR, with a VPN, and crypto currency. Without once grasping that the devices you use to do such things are the single point of failure, in terms of his privacy/ability to keep crime private.
He had half a million in play money, the absolute spanner could definitely pick up a laptop and phone when he landed.
That's what I'd do and i'm *not* a criminal, i'm a boring middle aged random man who just thinks that it would be preferable to not spend the extra hour or two having everything checked.
I'm not someone raking in hundreds of thousands on some silk-road style amazon for drugs and the like. I'm just someone who would prefer to minimise time spent in an airport.
That's what I'd do and i'm *not* a criminal, i'm a boring middle aged random man who just thinks that it would be preferable to not spend the extra hour or two having everything checked. I'm not someone raking in hundreds of thousands on some silk-road style amazon for drugs and the like. I'm just someone who would prefer to minimise time spent in an airport.
Select your preferred response below:
1) He doth protest too much, methinks.
2) That's what they all say.
3) Tell that to the judge.
4) No smoke without fire.
5) Book him, Danno
The way I read it they nabbed him for his administrative and enabling involvement in Dream Market, and the rest of it is just their proof that the market sells drugs, presumably with some vendors offering to US clients.
Interesting they didn't try and get the gendarmes to do this with a bit of help from Interpol?
Going to USA is like going to the prison capital of the world. Because they imprison more people per capita than virtually any other country in the world.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/uk/06/prisons/html/nn2page1.stm
This isn't well-known in western countries, who are friendly with USA. This is like a blind spot for westerners and even for people who live in USA. Which isn't surprising.
It's a lot easier to focus your attention on the faults of your rivals and enemies, than look at yourself and your friends with a critical eye.
This isn't well-known in western countries, who are friendly with USA. This is like a blind spot for westerners and even for people who live in USA. Which isn't surprising.
Americans are well aware that we have more prisoners per capita than any other nation. The problem is that half the country doesn't recognize that as a problem and think we should be locking up even more "criminals". But to be fair most of our prisoners are in for drug offenses, so staying out of jail in America is as simple as not doing drugs (which, admittedly, is easier said than done for an addict). Our authorities simply refuse to recognize any other way of dealing with drug epidemics. A whole lot of them, when you point to countries that have successfully dealt with the problem, will say something ignorant about "dirty socialists".
"But to be fair most of our prisoners are in for drug offenses, so staying out of jail in America is as simple as not doing drugs"
There's far more to it than that. Private prisons have resulted in judges taking kickbacks to sentence more heavily and be more inclined to find guilt in a non-jury trial, and the constant violation of the 15th amendment by (mostly) southern states means that they can (and have) systematically disenfranchised the poor and the non-white by increased targetting for enforcement actions. Drug usage is about the same across all racial groups, but black men account for the vast majority of those imprisoned for such offences and the fact that they have a criminal record disallows them from voting.
All else fails they are likely to get him on this one.
https://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/195/kw/Amount%20of%20money%20allowed
It's how flexible this is regard Bitcoin.
What constitutes as "Negotiable Monetary Instruments" for currency reporting requirements?
"Coin or currency from the U.S. and/or other countries, including gold coins"
The charge stems from the fact he owns, moderates, and provides a web site known to be used to sell drugs in the USA. If amazon.com sold drugs illegally, Mr. Bezos will be put behind bars.
You don't have to do the selling yourself; the fact you create an application which automatically does this, or create a site for the express purpose of selling illegal drugs is going to get you into trouble.