Thanks iRobot...
... I was considering to buy one of your products... now your products are off the list of the once I'd consider buying.
Roomba maker iRobot recorded soaring sales and banked rising profits in the three months to July, according to figures revealed on Tuesday. Yet despite all that success, the vacuum-cleaning bot builder has its eyes on another lucrative prize: the layout of your home. Chief exec Colin Angle believes his bottom line can be …
I think the article is quite explicit in the fact that if you don't register or connect to the WiFi/Bluetooth then it won't return information. How true this is? Who knows. However I do think they have taken a more mature stance than most companies by announcing what they want to do before just enabling it by default.
I think the article is quite explicit in the fact that if you don't register or connect to the WiFi/Bluetooth then it won't return information
True. But you'll find that quite a lot of facilities and gadgets are now sold with an explicit assumption that you register, otherwise they won't even work. I've got a few health tracking apps that would be great if they didn't want to ship my data to some unknown entity in the big blue sky as well, and I thus got my money back for every single one (not in description).
You know how this device goes off exploring the floor-space in your living accommodation? It might just do the same with your WiFi. What SSID's are in the vicinity? Let's try logging in using a dictionary of common passwords. BTW if you drop your credit card on the floor and the device detects either the characters on the card, or can read the magnetic strip then the fall-back is to login to OpenZone or similar.
A bit far-fetched maybe today, but in a few year's time people will be tying down their IoT's to prevent them going walkabout when their owners are out at work.
How to covertly toss an apartment, Stasi style
Also, Rosa Klebb would have employed the Stasi.
or you could get adverts from Amazon (other etailers are available for the time being) that give you a picture of your room with the item of dross they want to flog you shown already in situ using AR.
With all that IoT and its inherrent insecurities and now this thing, it is going to be harder than ever to keep what goes on inside our homes a secret from the outside world.
Does anyone sell a kit to turn a home into a giant Faraday Cage? (and don't say Amazon...)
Does anyone sell a kit to turn a home into a giant Faraday Cage? (and don't say Amazon...)
Funny you should ask. I have on offer a special discount on my new Faraday wallpaper especially for owners of various IoT devices. It's available in rolls from 37.5 sq. ft. all the way up to 150 sq. ft., in multi-roll packs, and in two convenient widths of 12 and 18 inches. There's even a lighter duty version for those low trafficked areas that works well when applied to windows1 and ceilings. Act now and I'll double the offer for fee2, just pay separate shipping, fuel surcharge, taxes, title, destination, license, groping, and handling fees.
1. Alternate interior illumination sources may be required. 2. no, it's not a typo.
This post has been deleted by its author
1) Make stuff people like to buy.
2)Don't have it collect personal data on them or their belongings
3)Don't send it to a remote server farm
4)Don't sell it to WTF pays you the most.
I like to think of it as the (none of your f**king) business model.
I actually made my own vacuum robot instead of shelling out a ludicrous amount just for this slow piece of junk.
I don't know what to say, I'm just really sorry for those poor souls who are going to get their houses broken into because the floorplans of their house were sold on the black market. Don't let these people lose their sanity in vain, let this be a lesson to us all.
Well, I was going to rob this house, but decided not to because I didn't know what the internal layout was. Even though it was a standard Georgian terrace house of which I've seen dozens, I just didn't feel comfortable climbing in without a sketchy point-cloud representation of its insides.
/s
Meanwhile, theft of phones has gone down *because* they are connected and can shop the thief or be disabled.
Like you, I don't think the house's layout is of much interest for burglars (unless it's some big mansion), but on the other hand, they would be really interested in knowing which stuff you own, at what times you are at work and when you're on holidays, and all this info could -I think- be extracted from the Rumba's data transmissions.
We have a bespoke AI house cleaning device, admittedly produced in very limited numbers. Me. Doesn't store any data and certainly cannot send it anywhere. It is even stated that it isn't very good at cleaning, only adequate like these robots. Just ask my wife.
Buy now, supplies are limited:
For Sale
Properties for Sale - Missile Bases, Communication Bunkers, & Underground Properties
My roomba is not equipped with wifi. Nor bluetooth, or any other communications other than the physical controls on it. Neither does it have half the other attributes described in the article.
But it does a b***** good job with my floors. Especially the bedroom carpet, which (being deeper than others in the house) was visibly cleaner after the roomba than it ever had been after cleaning with a conventional upright vacuum cleaner.
The article says $irobot-boss would like to sell such data. But it only invites you to suppose that a roomba collects any such data (Granny Weatherwax would say headology). Maybe some do, but I've not encountered them.
But it does a b***** good job with my floors. Especially the bedroom carpet, which (being deeper than others in the house) was visibly cleaner after the roomba than it ever had been after cleaning with a conventional upright vacuum cleaner.
All I can say is that you must have a really shit vacuum if one of these undergassed battery powered fluff flickers does a better job. I haven't encountered one yet that will even come close to my Miele.
The problem with those privacy statements is that they fail to clarify as to which customers they're discussing. Third parties buying up their data are customers, too.
I always get a kick when Facebook users refer to themselves as customers, when in reality they're more like the product...
They are users, not customers.
Product is what FB advertisers buy from FB.
Which is the data on habits of the users and access to them on their pages.
"Product" is exactly the correct word for them.
"<<SOME COMPANY>> takes your privacy very seriously."
"<<SOME COMPANY>> values your privacy."
If Pinocchio uttered those words, his nose would instantly be a million miles long. They are meant for you to think they respect your privacy. "We take your privacy very seriously" means "we only listen to serious offers." "We value your privacy" means "your privacy is valuable to our company and we want to sell it to increase our value."
But the saddest part of all is people blithely just surrender their privacy. Benjamin Franklin once said (paraphrasing) 'any society that would give up a little security to gain a little freedom will deserve neither and lose both'. Well, I am saying that any person who would give up a little privacy to save a little money will deserve neither and lose both.
"Benjamin Franklin once said (paraphrasing) 'any society that would give up a little security to gain a little freedom will deserve neither and lose both'."
Franklin actually said the opposite, ie. "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." The inverted version is quite apt here though.
"in order for the lights to turn on when you walk into a room, the home must know what lights are in which rooms"
Wrong. It would also work just fine with a sensor that only connected to a lightbulb and a power source, without the need for any internet connectivity or data collection.
The only reason iRobot would even suggest otherwise is to make more money by selling all that customer data, betraying their customers in the process. A real 'Ratner moment' indeed.
But you heathen that is totally against the IoT mantra and therefore you must say five "Hail Terminator"'s. Sensors are for people who live in the 90's and not a modern individual which has everything connected to the interwebs!!!!!!!!
<insults were half price, don't complain> :P
"in order for the lights to turn on when you walk into a room, the home must know what lights are in which rooms"
Wrong. It would also work just fine with a sensor that only connected to a lightbulb and a power source, without the need for any internet connectivity or data collection.
I have these in my house - they're called infrared motion detectors.
or, you can even build the IR detection into the bulb:
https://www.amazon.com/7W-Motion-Sensor-Light-Bulb/dp/B071NJ71KH/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&qid=1501096739&sr=8-24&keywords=infrared+detector
“sound systems could match home acoustics"
Check. Called a volume control.
"air conditioners could schedule airflow by room"
CHECK. CALLED A REMOTE.
"smart lighting could adjust according to the position of windows and time of day.”
CHECK!! CALLED A F****** LIGHT SWITCH!!!
For the sound system to actually match home acoustics, it would need a full 3D model including the materials the objects are made with. And then only a few trained ears will spot the difference.
To optimize AC airflow again, you'll need a model of how air moves inside the house for different conditions external and internal, and where hot/cold spots happen. It would need distributed temperature, pressure and air speed sensors - and different air outlets.
Lights would need to know how much ambient light is already available, its direction, and how much light the person in the room *actually* need to perform a given task. Eating is different from reading a book which is different from watching TV which is different from listening to music, etc.
If the Roomba turns into a real robo-butler which will take my jacket when I return home, serves the tea and turn on the lights accordingly to my actual needs, I'll buy it...
~ This incenses me!... I buy less tech / electronics overall because of this 'hey consumer, you're a mark' shit! So keep going Roomba / Microsoft / IoT-whoever. You are collectively killing the consciousness of your market.
~ You're extinguishing yourself out of existence, not creating the tech renaissance you think you are. A lot of smart-watch / fit-shit / IoT-smart-ass outfits are finding this out right now! Even VR is hurting in its hype etc!
So iRobot enables the room layouts to sold for marketing purposes. In and of itself this would be annoying but it is of limited value.
BUT - what if a later version of the vacuum cleaner was equipped with a dust analyzer?
The dust data then becomes VERY valuable. Imagine the targeted ads for soaps & detergents, or letting us know that our cat has fleas.
Some bright-spark will write an app that tracks home cleanliness, mashes the data into a single index and then shares the ranking with our friends. Some other bright-spark will take the home cleanliness index and use that to feed into credit scoring, or employability ranking.