Place holders
The new Place Holders feature in OneDrive required changes to NTFS to support the virtual files. I guess they assumed they couldn't support other file systems if Place Holders wasn't something you could just disable.
Microsoft has tried to DoS its forum servers, by changing its OneDrive consumer policy to only support cloud backups of NTFS-formatted drives without warning users first. Unsurprisingly, that's lit up the forums with complaints, because people only found out when OneDrive popped up error messages. Windows 10 insiders copped …
I have my Windows 10 folder/placeholder already created for the K Edition of Windows 10. We've already decided on the naming convention for the Oct/Nov 2017 release of Windows 10.
Why K-Edition?
Windows 10 F'CU, "K Ed.ition".
It's like they WANT to piss their customer base off so bad that the customers go elsewhere.
Web cam works? *Apply update* Not anymore.
Microphone works? *Update* Not anymore!
File system works? *Update* Not anymore!
What's next, MS deciding to remove your networking device drivers as a "security measure to protect against hackers"? I'm sure THAT will go over well when their customers can no longer get online...
I have been linux on the desktop/laptop since about 1997 now, wow has it been that long. But I still have a windows 7 VM and my main computer is still dual boot with windows 7 (one of the last laptops that sold with windows 7).
I have used a bit of windows 2012 (always quickly installed classic shell, though have no intention of using windows 10 as long as win7 still works. Shit, even my recent windows server deployments were all 2008R2(windows makes up less than 1% of my server infrastructure).
MS just seems hell bent on screwing power users over, it is quite unfortunate. I used to be hard core anti MS back in the 90s, but was getting to like them(even bought several copies of windows 7 and Visio) up until they started the windows 10 push.
"What's next, MS deciding to remove your networking device drivers as a "security measure to protect against hackers"?
I'm pretty sure it was during the Creator's update that a lot of the vendor's wifi card drivers were replaced with a generic Microsoft one that didn't work so well.
Ahhhhhhh.
The light dawns with the intensity of a nuclear weapon.
That's the reason for all this crazy s**t.
Microsoft are remembering the days when they were an effective monopoly.
The good old days (for Microsoft)
"We can do anything. We don't care if users don't like it. They'll whine a bit then do it anyway. Because we're Microsoft."
You left out AUTOMATIC Win10 update that updated FIRMWARE and bricked Win10 x86 Tablets with keyboards used as Netbooks.
Not recoverable without special programming hardware and original firmware.
All of the MS "Cloudy" stuff seems to be a broken menace on a laptop / net book / x86 tablet used in traditional windows fashion to create / edit content.
You forgot the anniversary update that messed up the partition table on dual boot systems. They subdivided the Windows partition to create a recovery partition but when rebuilding the partition table assumed anything with a filesystem that Windows doesn't native support was just empty space. Goodbye grub, goodbye Linux.
It's like they WANT to piss their customer base off so bad that the customers go elsewhere.
I'm getting the impression they merely want to filter out the recalcitrant sheep so they know what's left will accept anything. At which point prices will go up..
Had some twit at a datacenter (softlayer, pre-IBM) respond to a (not particularly terrible) DDoS attack by, in his own paraphrased/summarized words "drop protocol 6 to port 80 and protocol 17 to port 53". This was on an Arbor TMS, which has much more advanced attack mitigation capabilities than just knocking a shared (several hundred customers) webserver off of the Internet. Point is, assume incompetence followed by laziness in this case.
One workaround was to format the SD card as NTFS, then use disk manager to assign it to an empty folder on the C drive. Not sure if it still works. I don't like syncing cloud services or backup services to SD cards. Windows has a funny habit of reassigning drive letters occasionally if a card pops out by accident. Could cause another external drive to be overwritten.
Yes, but if you were going to dedicate the card for OneDrive sync, NTFS used to have some advantages over FAT32 and exFAT in terms of search speed, compression, large file size, security settings. I'm assuming things haven't changed much in that regard the past couple of years.
If you're using a card in a camera, you usually don't want anything else but the camera messes with the card contents. You usually copy files out of the card, but let the camera manage the card. Most camera software is not designed to cope with cards managed also by other systems, they usually follow "Design rule for Camera File system", and may not like alterations to its structure.
I would never attempt to sync a card used in a camera directly with OneDrive or anything alike (unless the camera has specific support), if a backup is needed copy the data to a OneDrive folder elsewhere.
Cards used elsewhere as portable disks are another matter.
I would never attempt to sync a card used in a camera directly with OneDrive or anything alike (unless the camera has specific support), if a backup is needed copy the data to a OneDrive folder elsewhere.
Exactly. Just load MobaXterm or Cygwin on that sucker, and rsync your OneDrive folder to the SD card.
"isn't the point of not using NTFS so the SD card is portable to other systems whether a camera, or something"
pretty much, yeah. Or a Linux computer, for that matter.
/me wonders if there will EVER be a 'user file system' (as in non-kernel), such as 'Fuse', but on winders, where people can pretty much do "whatever they want" just like in Linux and FreeBSD.
next, the ability to format exFAT or FAT or FAT32 will be removed...
This is all well and good , BUT most cameras in fact I will say I have yet to see a camera that supports NTFS on a media card, so yay it works with windows, crap the camera can't use it anymore.
Cameras, tablets and media players should have just moved to EXT4 (or something similar) years ago. Adding native support to MSWin would be a simple matter of installing an IFS driver just *once*, and it would be usable regardless of the portable device it came from. Make a user-space application for those systems where you don't have the rights to install drivers. Again, just one portable r/w application would handle any device's memory card. So blatantly obvious there must be some bribery preventing it from happening.
Why are you using onedrive at all. Why are you trusting Micro$oft with your data. One day you will get a message saying that you have not clicked on enough advents and they are deleting all your one drive data!.
I have hundreds of gig of photos and the same with music. I back up to a local NAS drive. Much safer. Less likley that Microsoft will shaft it!
For me a cloud backup would be the LAST thing i would use.i.e. the least trustworthy.
"Why are you using onedrive at all. Why are you trusting Micro$oft with your data. One day you will get a message saying that you have not clicked on enough advents and they are deleting all your one drive data!"
Yeah - No. My company pays for some OneDrive storage, and also some DropBox. There's no "clicking on adverts". I've never heard of MS even employing such a system anyway. Apparently, using cloud services such as OneDrive and DropBox to sync data to agents in the field is important to my company. Imagine that.
However, I agree with your basic premise - I do nightly backups of the data in my care to disk. I don't trust any cloud provider that much.
Yet Another Foot Gun Moment For Microsoft.
Will they ever learn?
I hope not as their antics provide endless enjoyment for the likes of those who comment here, MS FanBois excluded.
Didn't the Final FAT patents just expire? Perhaps that is a reason? I seem to remember reading that 2017 was the expiry time for those Patents.
If that is true then they don't their their tithes/usury/royalties from the SD Card makers and kit that uses SD cards, they are turning their attention to NTFS where the patent bandwagon still applies.
"even Redmond creations like the Resilient File System (ReFS) are blocked"
So yet another case of their right hand not knowing what their left hand is doing.
MS have looked for many years like they no longer have functioning management. Individual projects may roll out OK, but the bigger picture is lost. Two different control panels ever since Win8? Check. But that was 5 years ago, so surely it has been resolved by now. Oh dear. Patchy support even amongst the built-in utilities (like the aforementioned control panel) for hi-dpi displays ever since Vista. Check. But that was 10 years ago, so surely it has been resolved by now. Oh dear.
So if the entire senior management team falls over in the forest, does anyone actually notice?
I would have thought the answer was obvious from the huge cheer bursting forth from said forest as the team bites the loam. People near the scene may spot a glimpse of the BOFH and PFY strolling away pints in hand smiling at a job well done.
Ok what one of those gives you 5 installations of Office and 5TB of storage for less than a tenner a month?
Good point, I missed that, probably because we've been using LibreOffice for years. It's shocking just how much money we must have saved, but that wasn't the original aim. The aim was to reduce risk of security issues and removing exposure to licensing scams "schemes". True, that translates into costs too but it's more about not having to worry.
I cannot tell you how good it feels not to use anything by Microsoft at all, and it's far better than recovering from your average addiction: in this case, there's absolutely NO craving to ever go back.
5TB of storage for less than a tenner a month
1 - that's 5TB if it would actually work..
2 - ever tried to fill 5TB through a network straw?
3 - that's 5TB lost if they screw up - and their track record confirms they eventually will.
It may be worth considering a more reputable company..
I disagree:
1. I am currently at over 3TB across the accounts and it all works fine. I sync across multiple PCs and tablets and even my phone has easy access. Works perfectly.
2. You don't fill it all at once, silly.
3. I have a backup of course. And Google / Dropbox / Amazon, whoever are all as likely to mess up.
I don't need to - MS are doing sterling work. They are for the company I work for and the company my partner works for. No complaints at all - and I suspect that outside the small bubble that is the Reg - they do fine for pretty much every customer.
I'm cool with it.
1. This is the most minor thing in the world, this only affects a very specific use-case and you can get around it by converting your drive to NTFS.
2. Some of us have 1Gbps bidirectional fibre.
3. Haven't yet, I've had OneDrive (SkyDrive) since the beginning.
In case you plan on saying anything else, I do have local backups as well, but I want an extra set of copies in case the place goes down in flames.
Besides, who's "more trustworthy"? Google? Amazon? All the giant multi-nationals would sell you out for a nickle if they thought they could get away with it.
ZFS on a SD card? ZFS works well with many disks and a lot of RAM. Probably not what you're going to use on your average small laptop. ZFS on a single disk is mostly useless.
FAT is not a reliable file system - do people already forgot the DOS/Win 9x issues?
Cameras use it (mostly exFAT, today), because it's fast, simple to implement, and with very little overhead. All they care is getting the data out of the buffer to the storage as fast as they can. They don't care about journaling, ACLs, concurrent accesses to files...
FAT is also the lowest common denominator, so it's good for moving files across different systems, but it's a PITA for long term storage.
> "1. This is the most minor thing in the world, this only affects a very specific use-case and you can get around it by converting your drive to NTFS."
Making your SD card useless for anything other than Windows machines.
> "2. Some of us have 1Gbps bidirectional fibre."
Most people don't.
>Ok what one of those gives you 5 installations of Office and 5TB of storage for less than a tenner a month?
$10/month = $360 over three years which gives you 8TB of NAS-quality disk from any pc corner shop. You also get around 900Mb/s transfer rate rather than the soggy string a cloud provider gives you.
So faster and an extra 3TB of storage and from there the comparison only gets less favourable. You can also have as many installations of LibreOffice as you want. I have seven laptops, three servers and three desktops in the house. To cover those, I'll need to buy Windows 10 and pay $20/month (for end user devices only). The "servers" are old devices because my needs are small and I don't trust virtualisation in terms of putting them all on one physical device (they are internet-facing). Now I need to license Windows server for 8 cores on core-2 duo hosts. I'm running SMTP and webmail on-prem, so that's an exchange license too. You do back up your Outlook-Online email to an on-prem device don't you? MS doesn't do backups.
So my ROI is down to one and a half years on the disk purchase alone. Plus, a lot of the devices are old and I'll need to buy new windows 10 licenses *for each device* if I want to do the ecological thing and re-use old kit.
Windows licensing doesn't scale. Yes, MS Office is *much* better than LibreOffice - but not *that* much better. Let's face it, we keep all the windows infrastructure around to support Excel, Outlook calendaring and Visio.
$10/month = $360 over three years which gives you 8TB of NAS-quality disk from any pc corner shop. You also get around 900Mb/s transfer rate rather than the soggy string a cloud provider gives you.
Agree with all of that, but on-site storage will be of sod-all help if you (1) need to share files with others, (2) work from home or (3) have a Grenfell Tower sort of problem - one of the sales arguments for cloudy stuff is that it forms an off-site backup.
That is, of course, when it actually works. I hear from a good friend of mine that their taxpayer funded OneNote experience is far from impressive, so I'm glad I never even felt the temptation to try.
I think if it costs me $10/month I can afford a new 4G SD card every month to copy important stuff to, and throw it in a drawer somewhere. Or for a few months' cost, maybe an external USB drive...
I also burn backups to DVD once in a while. tax time is a good time for this. I keep them in a fireproof safe with other important schtuff. Old school, yeah.
"As part of setting up Windows 10 on customers PCs I also uninstall OneDrive."
How do you do that? When last I checked (last week...) it was possible to _disable_ OneDrive in Win 10, but not kill it. Apparently MS borrowed some tech from Facebook and the Hotel California.
And how they are better than OneDrive, especially Google? It's just a matter of choosing in what pan you like to be fried.
Mailing to yourself it's exactly what many data leak protection software try to block... just like USB disks and non-company approved cloud storage.
So, technically, a beta, not a release copy?
Annoying, irritating, and probably a damned stupid idea, but isn't the purpose of betas and previews to test things before general release?
And don't folk on the insider program get warned that things might not work the way that they think that they should?
Methinks the insiders protest too much.
Well if the insiders don't complain when testing the beta builds, the average user gets shafted when it goes through to release without opposition.
highlighting (complaining about) problems (and reduction in functionality where that functionality is used is most definitely a problem) is kinda the point of the whole insider program...
"So, technically, a beta, not a release copy?
...
Methinks the insiders protest too much."
The purpose of a beta test is to get users to report bugs. Unless you're just pottering about you don't turn round and tell the bug reporters that that's what it's supposed to do.
Aye you can report bugs.
But using it for your day to day system or for a production system is specifically stated by Microsoft as a bad idea as things may not work, systems may get screwed up, functionality may not be what you expected.
Whinging about it on Reddit, saying "WHAT A FECKING LIBERTY" rather than saying "In this preview build, losing ResFS or FAT32 access to OneDrive seems to be bit of retrograde step" is just stupid.
It's a beta. It's not meant for general use. Report errors, post about errors, say why you think it's a bad idea.
Reacting like 3 year old who has spat out his dummy is just lame.
Granted, you shouldn't be using it for a production system, but if you are / want to be an insider, you should be using it as a day-to-day system.
There is little point booting up, checking that you can run your browser and maybe one or two other maps and calling it a day.
If you are not following a particular testing process, then you need to exercise the system as much as possible. Maybe don't use it as your (only) storage for all your important documents etc, but you should most definitely be using it as much as possible, so that if there are problems, you are more likely to run into them.
I do wish that they gave us choice. I don't care - really don't care if syncing a file takes a tiny bit longer. Pop up a box when I select an SD card telling me it'll be a tiny bit slower and let me say "Nah - don't care". But then again this is a feature in BETA software that may never reach end users. I imagine that they will try stuff and see if it flies. We do exactly the same with our stuff - preview releases designed just for feedback.
Why are you using onedrive at all. Why are you trusting Micro$oft with your data. One day you will get a message saying that you have not clicked on enough advents and they are deleting all your one drive data!.
I have hundreds of gig of photos and the same with music. I back up to a local NAS drive. Much safer. Less likley that Microsoft will shaft it!
For me a cloud backup would be the LAST thing i would use.i.e. the least trustworthy.
I have OneDrive installed on my Win 10 systems, and my Macs, and my iDevices. I have, allegedly, a glorious terabyte of storage available in Redmond. At last check I was using 8.8 GB of that terabyte, mostly for files I need to share between various systems. The iDevices are all running iOS 10.3 or later, which means APFS; the Macs are running HFS+. Should MS blather about making those systems have NTFS, the sonic boom you hear will be me copying the contents of the OneDrive folder to iCloud or DropBox and then deleting OneDrive from Apple systems and disabling it in Win 10 'cause it seems that it's not possible to kill it there.
You will note that my Win 7 systems do NOT have OneDrive installed.
Plans are currently under way to get my very own private cloudy crap, at which time I'll say bye-bye to OneDrive, iCloud, and Dropbox.
"Microsoft OneDrive wants to ensure users have the best possible sync experience on Windows, which is why OneDrive maintains the industry standard of support for NTFS."
How is not being able to sync, ensuring that users have the best possible sync experience ?
SD cards are Fat32 so they work with Mac and with cameras as well as Windows. It's a fact of life Microsoft have simply ignored.
They show their utter contempt -- and we increasingly return the compliment.
Yeah, variations on that particular bastard weasel phrase "To provide the best possible experience" always mean "We made this change for our own benefit and now we're going to pretend that we did it for yours". If they had an actual good technical reason, they'd have given it, not that empty marketing-speak stock phrase.
"Microsoft discovered a warning message that should have existed was missing when a user attempted to store their OneDrive folder on a non-NTFS filesystem – which was immediately remedied. Nothing has changed in terms of official support and all OneDrive folders will continue to need to be located on a drive with the NTFS filesystem."
Hanlon's razor
As much as I love to harass MS for their evil behaviour, I suspect this is a technical issue. MS have just proven to be incapable of making OneDrive sync work on anything else, but are outright ashamed to admit they can't code their way out of a wet paper bag. So cue in the mealy-mouthed marketing-speak, because that's all their capable of doing.