One must ask ones self
If they're promising all this now, why haven't they done it for the last 7 years?
The Conservatives have pledged to introduce a digital charter in the party's manifesto today, which also rehashes a number of familiar-sounding ideas about “digital by default” government and backs the failing identity authentication platform Verify. Under the section entitled “Prosperity and security in a digital age”, the …
One has to surmise that the only way Government will do anything it is elected on is to have elections once a year or pass a law that promises must be fulfilled with reasonable exceptions.
I also see that Chancellor May is also not to be outdone by a previous PM known as the milk snatcher by taking away primary school kids lunches harming the lowest in society who already have to use food banks even while working.
I was a recipient of free milk too, and loved it! Never had any problems with milk being off, and I always volunteered to deal with any extras left over, sometimes consuming thee or four bottles of the stuff. Just about the only happy memories I have of school, outside of science lessons.
In Australia, in summer, the free milk was dreaded. It sat all morning non-refrigerated. Consumption was mandatory except for two kids who only drank goats milk.
Invariably there were calls for the 'bucket of sand'....to cover the { barf }
Probably why I only like my milk ICE cold.
My missus was the recipient of free milk in schools and said they dreaded it as there was no refrigeration in the school and so the milk was always warm and just about going off.
Never had that problem. The delivery bloke left the crates stacked up against the north wall, permanently in the shade and where the gentle breeze wafting off the North Sea kept it at a perfect drinking temperature.
Because one must realise that one is about to experience a General Election and in the run up to said election criminals politicians tend to forget their promises, where they left the microphone and occasionally where they left their trousers.
As for the "right to be forgotten", didn't the Tories already do that to the rest of the UK that isn't a part of the Home Counties?
Not just Rupe...that nice Mr Hislop will be rather chuffed at not having to pay the other sides costs on the rare occasions that Private Eye wins. In fact most of the press will like that one, even the non-Tory bits.
Not that that would have been a calculation...
"Local government will also be expected to publish data in open formats, anonymised and aggregated where necessary."
The other day, I was unlucky enough to download a copy of the minutes of a local council meeting in PDF. In the expenses section, was the clerk and deputy clerk's monthly salary, nicely blacked out. Which of course rendered it impossible to read. Until I tried highlighting it and copy pasting into a text document.
Trivial example, but the point being, I don't trust their ability to protect their own data, let alone other people's.
How they going to do that, given May and her predecessor Home Secretaries have provided over such a massive and ongoing theft of voters data already.
Or the DPA, whose quality is so s**t that an FOIA request to explain how s**t it is would "Endanger Brexit negotiations."
British readers. Go tactical. If you like your MP, vote for them. If you don't, find out who was the runner up party last time and vote for their candidate. Remember you can vote for nobody, but you'd better not start bi**hing about their policies afterward.
There's also a mention in the manifesto of requiring ID to vote.
Bearing in mind there is the poorest people don't have driving licenses and many do not have passports - what is this ID going to be?
Am I being paranoid in thinking the Home Office has disinterred an ID card 'consultation' document from the same crypt where they keep former Home Secretaries and is bringing it lurching back to life?
Or is it a good old American-style disenfranchisement exercise where you make it practically impossible for the wrong sort of people to vote?
See also:
-Ending automatic registration of students in university halls
-Ending automatic registration of children coming of age in the run up to an election
-Ending the ability to register a whole household in a single form
All of these things, like the voter ID proposals, disproportionately impact people who don't vote tory. Make of that what you will.
"Bearing in mind there is the poorest people don't have driving licenses and many do not have passports - what is this ID going to be?"
It will be pretty much identical to the Northern Ireland system, I expect - that system has been running smoothly for a couple of decades now. Simply put, people without a Passport or a driving licence can apply for an a electoral identity card. People in that situation would apply for the card when they first register to vote.
The government's secret public consultation on encryption ends tomorrow. You still have time to tell the Home Office where to stick its keys:
https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press/releases/2017/secret-consultations-have-no-place-in-open-government
You can mail the Home Office consultation at:
investigatorypowers@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk.
(They'd really rather you didn't - especially if you know more about encryption than the Home Secretary*)
* You know more about encryption than the Home Secretary.
Is there anything in the manifesto about broadband speeds?
It's not much to ask for a strong and stable connection.
I do note the following though,
Increase the amount levied on firms employing migrant workers.
So if my maths is right, I need to employ a decent coder and it's going to cost me £60k in the UK but £30 from say India and the current levy is 1k rising to 2k. So rather than saving 29k I'm only going to save 28k.
Realistically it's just a policy to look good to voters who have an issue with immigration and companies are going to laugh at it as a bit of comedy.
By 2020 people will be able to identify themselves on all government online services via the Verify ID portal. It hopes to make the platform more widely available, so that people can safely verify their identify to access non-government services such as banking.”
Oh joy. A single point of failure, so that when it (inevitably) gets compromised it's the key to everything.
The Tories promise to reduce duplication personal data held by government in order to follow the “Once-Only” principle for central services by 2022 and wider public services by 2025.
So they can easily tie together everything that each department knows about you (and promptly have it hacked - see above).
I like this from page 82
...
help create the most comprehensive digital map of Britain to date. In doing so, it will support a vibrant and innovative digital economy, ranging from innovative tools to help people and developers build to virtual mapping of Britain for use in video games and virtual reality.
looks like that postgrad minecraft project is getting dusted off again - because 'look we're hip'.
https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/innovate/developers/minecraft-map-britain.html
I assume this means you will remove all third party tracking devices from websites hosted on gov.uk and nhs.uk
Oh silly me. It's not so much that you do not know your arse from your elbow but in the battle for control of your mouth the bit that should have known the difference turned into a desiccated walnut and the elbow won.
Just in case... most peoples arses are more intelligent than their elbows but you still manage to spout shit with your elbow in control.
>So just after announcing we are going to continue with GDPR after brexit we will then have another data protection law after that? Love it when a plan comes together..
Am I missing something, or isn't the right to be forgotten part of GDPR anyway? Or they just promising us something that we will get next year without them doing anything so that they can claim to have kept one manifesto promise.
Am I missing something, or isn't the right to be forgotten part of GDPR anyway?
Sort of.
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/data-protection-reform/overview-of-the-gdpr/individuals-rights/the-right-to-erasure/
"The right to erasure does not provide an absolute ‘right to be forgotten’. Individuals have a right to have personal data erased and to prevent processing in specific circumstances:"
Said circomstances are:
Where data is no longer needed for the purpose for which it was originally collected
Where you withdraw consent
Where you object to the processing and there is no over-riding legitimate need for the data
Your data was improperly collected or processed
There is a legal requirement
Where the data is about IT services offered to a child
There are limitations to the right for your data to be erased:
Freedom of expression
You have a legal requirement to keep it
Public health
Archiving for public interest or scientific use
Defending legal claims.
So - not an all-encompassing "Right to be forgotton".
It's a sad day when the "I" seems more on top of IT developments in politics than the Reg. Has anyone noticed that there are far more newspaper sites coming up in search results than ever before?
More things I'm expecting:
Google adding Newspeak to Google translate, then removing the other languages one by one. Then it turns out that it's not Google doing it but the swivel-eyed loons the public put in charge with a mandate to do this sort of crap.
Harmonisation of our laws with the land of the free from sense rolls towards completion so we can subjugate ourselves to becoming airstrip one. So much for Farage's independence day.
Future historians (of whom there are now only two because of the drastically reduced population) trace the cause of WW3 back to a referendum in 2016.
Everyone is happy because not being so carries the death penalty.
Future policy to be inspired directly from episodes of Black Mirror ("Some people think this has already happened" - DNA).
Things I'd rather have:
An extra option on all voting forms so I can vote for a coalition.
Every government policy must highlight clearly what's in it for the right wing, what's in it for the left wing and what's in it for the intelligent. (see what I did there?)
A government which announces e.g. it will balance the books in 5 years and then takes 7 to tell us it will actually take 15 is called out by every project manager in the land. At the rate that is slipping (more than 2 years every year) who can possibly believe they know what they're doing (unless the plan is to fix it by having a proper big war)?
An opposition who actually want to win an election rather than hope the apocalypse the other side bring on will make them electable by the survivors.
I know this last one is more far fetched than the others, but someone in government who actually has a clue about technology and what the right thing to do with it is.
Also, "Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon"?! WTF?