Male escort forgot pregnancy protection, scores data protection instead A German woman who was impregnated by a male escort she apparently hired to liven up a stay in the East of the country has had her attempts to track him down trumped by the country’s rigid data protection laws. The woman booked the professional priapist for a three night sojourn in a second floor room in a hotel in the town of …
The issue is : we don't know what "service" was requested.
She rented services of one "entertainer" for "a three night sojourn". This is not a one-time mistake. You'd think that she'd realize if or not he had a condom during that time and would be capable of putting a stop to things if she did not agree.
This post has been deleted by its author
"fishing around for 7 years worth of back payments probably has very little to do with the concerns of the child."
yeah, if she can afford an expensive hotel and a gigolo for 3 nights, perhaps she can afford decent food/clothing/school for the kid?
"Meal-ticket Mommy" indeed... can you say BACKLASH?
all four of the men would be being chased by the child support agency.
I'm not sure where my loyalties lie here. If she asked for no condom then I blame the woman as she was paying for the service. If on the other hand if she said she wanted mine Herr to bag up, then he should be tracked down and forced to help support the child.
condoms fail....
There is also the pill, the coil and implants.
When having "normal" sex there is nearly always a risk of pregnancy. Adding one layer of protection only reduces it, adding two reduces it further.
Almost no contraception* is 100 effective.
*other than actually already having kids. Which are often the best contraceptive you can have.
The title allows for alternative career paths in addition to Bedroom Buddy, i.e. Doughnut storage.
Mind you Hats off (and he could hold those as well) to the guy, a three day contract in that line off work meets errmm stiff requirements.
Coat please Oh you can hold one of those as well...
How amusing that a promiscuous, probably r-type, woman's, hypocritical and attempted parasitism was defeated later after 3 days and later months of complacency for not using protection, a morning after pill, or even getting an abortion.
If the selfish woman really wanted a child (I assume she did from the lack of abortion) and to get it paid for, it should have been mutually consensually agreed to inside a marriage, otherwise it becomes misandry (men hating) justified male slavery!
Those who even suggest she deserves payment disgust me as supporters of slavery, with Child Support Agencies as effective slave administrators, in an age when we had supposedly ended slavery, and that's before we even discuss income taxation.
How amusing that a promiscuous, probably r-type, woman's, hypocritical and attempted parasitism was defeated later after 3 days and later months of complacency for not using protection, a morning after pill, or even getting an abortion.
R-Type? Something related to the Super Nintendo game?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-Type
How does she know the escort is the kid's father? Or anyone else know?
Does the kid have a nine and a half inch cock (23-24cm) and a healthy bank balance?
I'm also surprised there are no photos for ID ( as mentionned earlier via the escort ad/agency) or during the three day event.
Had i laid out for such shenanigans i sure as hell would've wanted piccies.
"Anal" is also an effective contraceptive. Apparently.
Interesting circumstances, and a good example of strong data privacy laws.
There are some mainstream feminists that will see this as a miscarriage of justice.
They feel that no matter the circumstances, the man should be financially responsible. Was it his sperm? Responsible. Full stop. Even if it wasn't his sperm, he should be financially obligated if he had sex with the woman around the time she became pregnant. Or simply was in a relationship with her, including a estranged marriage.
-- will ever decide to look the kid up? Some men might do that, but the likelihood is lessened by the mother's bid for money. Too bad, that, but at least the guy knows a kid is out there, and he has the name. If he even remembers that gig seven years ago, I guess.
As the father of an adopted son who has never known his birth-father, well, it does leave a potential void. Depends on the child's particular psychology whether the unknown is a wound or an itchy spot.
Imagine the kid, the kid's feelings ... mum's looking for your hooker of a dad - How do you want that man to relate to the kid and the kid to him ?
I guess they could create a precedent in NOT allowing the mother to get the guy to pay up ... I think the most important is the child, in this case, and a child needs a stable family. A kid needs a stable family more than extra moneys ...
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
