
Nice article, Mr. Mellor!
Objective Analysis analyst Jim Handy has come up with a theory which he claims explains why Intel and Micron’s 3d XPoint memory will not meet its original performance claims. As Intel marketing droids have said, there is a difference between raw media access latency and SSD product access latency. Handy takes a (heh heh) handy …
No problem, bro. We'll check them when the hardware become available.
Then we'll see exactly where you stand.
Now, as far as I'm concerned, even if the actual performance is only divided by five, I'm not going to complain. Technology is a complex thing, and this is just about as close to rocket science as you can get without working for NASA or SpaceX, so I'm willing to cut them some slack if the figures aren't exactly what they said they would be.
Hell, four times faster instead of five would still be a win in my book.
Uhm you do realize that the memresistor was theorized back in the late 60's right?
I agree and hate the hype cycle as much as everyone else, however all I want is a component that I can touch and eventually buy.
Xpoint in a DIMM package would be disruptive technology.
When this technology hits, you'll see changes to how PCs and servers are designed. The impact on the PC thru to the data center in terms of design will be changed.