back to article Stop us if you've heard this one before: Telcos try to kill net neutrality

A group of US telcos has formally asked the courts to overturn the Open Internet rules put in place by the FCC, America's broadband nanny. A series of petitions filed by the likes of AT&T, CTIA and the National Cable and Telecommunications Association (NCTA) asked the court to throw out a June verdict from a district court …

  1. Will Godfrey Silver badge
    Meh

    Oink!

    Oink Oink Oink Oink Oink Oink Oink Oink Oink Oink Oink Oink

    That's what you get when you restrict their profits gouging.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Que defenders

    Claiming that we should be able to charge more for different packets. Just as we charge more for Dave to send mail instead of Jane. Just like we charge more for you to go through a toll booth if you drive a Toyota instead of a Ford. Just like we charge more if you are sending a DVD in the mail with a movie compared to sending that DVD of backup emails.

    See, makes perfect logical sense and is not price gouging at all.

    1. Steve Knox

      Re: Que defenders

      What defenders??

      Oh, you mean "cue" as in "to prompt" or "call to action". You appear to have gotten that crossed with "queue" as in "to line up" and come up with a term rather foreign to your intent.

    2. J.G.Harston Silver badge

      Re: Que defenders

      Que?

      1. cd / && rm -rf *
        Trollface

        Re: Que defenders

        ITYM: ¿Qué?

        HTH. HAND.

  3. mIRCat
    Childcatcher

    Those poor innocent profits..

    Won't somebody think of the profits!?

    1. asdf

      Re: Those poor innocent profits..

      >Won't somebody think of the profits!?

      They sure didn't think of incumbent telecoms profits when they allowed the cable companies get away with monopolies without common carrier (unlike the telecoms). Then again some these same telecoms (many M&A later) are the ancestors of the original telecom (AT&T) that took gouging to a whole new level with their monopoly and their guts to only allow you to have one of three home phones. In short, just the fact that public for profit utilities with government mandated monopolies exist without common carrier means your system is crony capitalism not true capitalism. Wheeler is only trying to make it less obvious.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Those poor innocent profits..

        "In short, just the fact that public for profit utilities with government mandated monopolies exist without common carrier means your system is crony capitalism not true capitalism."

        Crony capitalism is a NATURAL extension of true capitalism. Capitalism says you employ whatever leverage you can bring to bear, and if that means buy out or blackmail the government (like the robber barons did in the Gilded Age and the big oil companies do now), then you bring them to bear before someone else undercuts you. If it's cheaper to bribe inspectors than it is to actually "do the right thing," guess what happens?

        Based on that, it's just not possible for Americans to have nice things. Either the government smothers us, or private enterprise exploits us. Either way, the average guy loses.

        1. asdf

          Re: Those poor innocent profits..

          >Either the government smothers us, or private enterprise exploits us. Either way, the average guy loses.

          Wow well said. One of the truest and saddest sentences I have ever seen. Oh well on the bright side I guess I don't have cholera, or dysentery and I don't have to wait in bread lines to eat so compared to 95% of human existence (include even a large part today) life is grand indeed.

        2. Vector

          Re: Those poor innocent profits..

          "Based on that, it's just not possible for Americans to have nice things."

          We can have nice things. We just have to pay a not-so-nice price for them.

          1. Charles 9

            Re: Those poor innocent profits..

            Ergo, we can't have nice things. If we can't afford them, it's equivalent to not having them.

  4. Efros

    They really are a

    bunch of money grubbing twunts.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: They really are a

      Now, don't disparage twunts they didn't ask for this.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      flame on

      The one thing the Boomers will be remembered for will be making greed a virtue. Gots to get mine first.

      1. Ropewash
        Flame

        Re: flame on

        I like how you went AC just to poke the old timers.

        I think you'll find that the American robber barons actually preceded the boomers by a few generations. Not to mention it's also boomers who are writing the laws these guys are opposed to. (Tom Wheeler born 1946)

        Can't say which generation you think would do a better job of running things, but as a generationX I'll say "Not mine."

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: flame on

          > but as a generationX I'll say "Not mine."

          Considering the first GenXer to be on a major ticket was Paul Ryan I am guessing with our 1%ers things aren't going to change much. Even worse I am afraid we might be the last generation to even understand the concept of privacy.

  5. W. Anderson

    quite ominous results eventually

    The many tens of millions of American citizens who are ambivalent and ignorant about this ongoing fight by the large telecoms/Internet backbone carriers to have free rein over charging what "they" decide for Internet access and transmissions will rue the day they do not strongly and vocally, and legislatively support the current FCC ruling limiting the excessive greed demonstrated by these crass organixations.

    Every other developed nation (and some less developed), repeat every one knows the critical importance of equal, fair and freedom of access to the Internet, in that these countries have mandated by law such freedoms.

    Not so in the USA, where every aspect of life is left to commercial , capitalistic decisions and gains. it is most likely that the money grubbers will prevail, probably sooner rather than later, particularly with the backing of dozens or even hundreds of Congressional politicians in their pockets.

    At that point, the whole country educational system loses, other than filthy rich institutions, along with populace and every community organization as well as small business.

    So much for the "greatest" political mantra being spouted incessantly at each recent US Presidential party convention.

    1. Steve Davies 3 Silver badge

      Re: quite ominous results eventually

      Exactly my thoughts.

      Then all your internet HTTP/HTTPS traffic will be injected with Adverts by the ISP. These will subvert and replace the Ads that currently appear on the website UNLESS the operators of the websites PAY the ISP to block the Ads they will inject.

      Who pays the piper the most wins.

      Then the ISP will notice that you are using an Ad-blocker. That will lose them revenue so they will add a fee 'Ad-blocker permission' to every bill. $9.99/month seems to be the going rate for just about everything in the US at the moment. They'll to the same to let you use a VPN, FTP etc etc

      There are some sites in the USA that are already impossible to use because of the overpowering adverts. This will only get worse.

  6. RonWheeler

    a complex web of utility style rules.

    How hard is it to NOT create rules?

  7. Terry Cloth
    Thumb Up

    Sounds like it's worked reasonably so far

    One of the petitions [...] argues that the FCC is misusing decades-old rules intended to apply to the early days of radio and television.

    ``The [Open Internet] Order subjects broadband for the first time to a regulatory paradigm adopted 80 years ago for telephone monopolies, modeled on a regime first created for railroads,'' the petition reads.

    o Worked for the railroads

    o Worked for radio

    o Worked for television

    o Worked for the telephone

    o Looks like it'll work for packets

    Maybe they got it right over a century ago?

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Sounds like it's worked reasonably so far

      Yes, BUT:

      That was then (the era when government was seen as at the very least a "brake" on untrammeled and out of control corporate greed), and this is now.

      Gordon Gecko may be forgotten (it wasn't that good a movie) but he nicely summed up the drastic change in business vs government in the USA - and by default elsewhere in Western Civilization. And don't think you Eurocrats get away with playing dumb either. Just because you didn't start the latest run on the Bank of Humanity, doesn't mean you weren't the cause of the original sin a few hundred years ago.

      And so now it all comes down to who owns you - and us. The Government (a wholly owned subsidiary of, well, make your own list) or the Corporations. Some of those corporations are so intertwined with our governments that it would take a chicken sexer to divide them up. And even then, I suspect there'd be some problems with certain chickens...

      Don't stop fighting, arguing and pissing into the wind. It might make a difference. And if it doesn't, then you've had a lot of fun at somebody else's expense.

    2. Natasha Live

      Re: Sounds like it's worked reasonably so far

      Do you think they will apply the same logic to the American constitution? It as written a long time ago before the "modern" world so should be irrelevant.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Sounds like it's worked reasonably so far

        "Do you think they will apply the same logic to the American constitution? It as written a long time ago before the "modern" world so should be irrelevant."

        *ding ding ding* Give the lady a doll!

        What do you think's happening now? Power dictates the rules, full stop. Nothing you try to do beforehand can have any real effect on the machinations that go on now. If you have power, REAL power, then you by definition have the ability to squelch your enemies and competition. You ARE the law, and anything beforehand is just ink on a page.

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    No problem!

    We'll just boycott the companies paying dues to the NCTA, courtesy their site.

    Now which drawer did I leave the rabbit ears and flip phone in?

    A+E Networks

    Accenture

    ActiveVideo Networks, Inc.

    Advanced Digital Broadcast, Inc. (ADB, Inc.)

    Africa Channel

    Alcatel-Lucent

    Alticast, Inc.

    Altice USA

    Altice USA/Suddenlink

    AMC Networks Inc.

    Anthem Sports & Entertainment Corporation

    ARRIS

    AXS TV

    Baker Hostetler, LLP

    Beechwoods Software, Inc.

    Blonder-Tongue Labs, Inc.

    Bond & Pecaro

    Bortz Media & Sports Group, Inc.

    Broken Bow TV

    Cadent Technologies

    Canoe Ventures, LLC

    Carlsen Resources, Inc.

    Casa Systems

    Castalia Communications Corp.

    CEA Associates, LLC

    Charter Communications

    Cim-Tel Cable, Inc.

    Cisco Systems

    Clear Creek Mutual Telephone

    Coaxial Cable TV Corp.

    Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass LLP

    Colontel

    Comcast Corporation

    CommScope, Inc.

    comScore

    Conax As

    Conklin-Intracom

    Consolidated Cable Solutions

    Cox Communications, Inc.

    C-SPAN

    Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

    Deluxe Digital Distribution

    Discovery Communications, Inc.

    Disney Media Networks

    DOGTV

    Duff & Phelps, LLC

    Eagle Cablevision, Inc.

    Eagle Communications

    eClerx

    Entropic Communications, Inc.

    Ericsson

    Espial

    Euronews

    EWTN Global Catholic Network

    FamilyNet, Inc.

    Fox Networks Group

    Fuse Media

    Gainspeed, Inc.

    GCI Cable Inc.

    Hallmark Channel (Crown Media Holdings)

    Hamilton County Cable TV Inc.

    Hogan Lovells US LLP

    Home Box Office (HBO)

    Home Shopping Network

    Hood Canal Cablevision

    Horowitz Associates, Inc.

    HSN

    IBB Consulting Group

    iconectiv

    Incognito Software

    iN DEMAND

    Inspiration Networks (INSP)

    Intraway Corporation S.R.L.

    ION Media Networks

    itaas, Inc

    Juniper Networks

    Keene Valley Video, Inc.

    Kennedy Network Services, Inc.

    KPMG

    LG Electronics USA Inc.

    MCTV

    Mav'rick Entertainment Network, Inc.

    McGuire Wood LLP

    Mediacom Communications Corporation

    Mediamorph

    Metrological Media Innovations

    Midco

    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, P.C.

    Moultrie Telecomm. Inc.

    Mountain Zone TV

    NAPCO Security Technologies, Inc.

    National Geographic Channel (NGC)

    Navigate Corporation

    NBCUniversal

    Nelson County Cablevision Inc.

    NetCracker Technology

    NEUSTAR, Inc.

    Olympusat

    ONE World Sports

    Ovation TV

    Penthera Partners, Inc.

    pivot

    PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC)

    QVC, Inc.

    Rasenberger Media LLC

    RBC Daniels

    ReelzChannel

    Rentrak Corporation

    Retention Solutions LLC

    Retirement Living TV, LLC

    REVOLT Media & TV

    RFD TV

    Rovi Corporation

    S3 Group, Ireland

    Sand Cherry Associates

    Scripps Networks Interactive

    Service Electric Cablevision

    SES

    Sherman & Howard L.L.C.

    Showtime Networks

    Sjoberg's, Inc

    Smartvue Corporation

    Smithsonian Networks

    SomosTV LLC

    SonLife Broadcasting Network

    Sony Movie Channel

    Starz Entertainment Group

    Synacor, Inc.

    TBN - Trinity Broadcasting Network

    Television Cable Co. of Andalusia

    The Sportsman Channel, Inc.

    ThinkAnalytics

    This Technology, Inc

    TiVo, Inc.

    Turner Cable Networks

    TV One

    Universal Electronics, Inc.

    Universal Remote Control, Inc.

    Univision Communications Inc.

    UP

    UXP Systems, Inc.

    Veronis Suhler Stevenson

    Viacom Media Networks

    Viamedia

    Visual Advertising Sales Technology

    Vivicast Media, LLC

    Vozzcom, Inc.

    VUBIQUITY

    Vyve Broadband

    Waitsfield Cable Company

    Waller Capital Corporation

    Weather Channel, Inc., The

    WeTek, LLC

    White & Case LLP

    WideOrbit Inc.

    Womble Carlyle Sandbridge & Rice

    Zodiac Interactive

    1. Charles 9

      Re: No problem!

      I got news for you. That pretty much covers practically all the TV in the country.

      INCLUDING the big broadcasters.

      Disney (on the list) is the owner of ABC

      Comcast (on the list) is the owner of NBCUniversal, also on that list itself.

      Viacom (on the list) changed its name to National Amusements in 2006. It's is the majority owner of CBS.

      And you've probably noticed the Fox Networks Group.

      The only way you can effectively boycott is to get the Nielsen participants to unplug their TVs.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like