
sad but predictable
Guess somebody forgot to tell them Google doesn't make the money off the OS. Even Microsoft is moving away from that model on the desktop no less.
Cyanogen Inc, which develops an alternative flavour of Google's Android, has reportedly laid off a bunch of staff. The Seattle-based US startup takes code from the open-source CyanogenMod project, adds in some proprietary features, and tries to get phone makers to ship the package with their handsets. Basically, it seems, that …
Actually thinking about that makes me shake my damn head at yet another startup on the west coast. Its almost like three years on and with however many millions thrown at them the executives got together and said you know what lets go on a retreat and put together a business plan. At the end they were like I got nothing. Lets just fire people. Proving as an engineer or software dev you really need to be not just good at your job but have a feel for how good the suits are at theirs as well.
Guess somebody forgot to tell them Google doesn't make the money off the OS.
Well, not through direct sales of licenses, though we don't know what they charge Samsung et al for Play Services and any other binary blobs that aren't part of AOSP. There has to be a monetary exchange there otherwise there's no valid contract.
It's the imposition of those binary blobs that are Google's means to making money indirectly. Though in the view of the European Union anti trust investigation it resembles an extortion racket, a point of view presumably resonant with Cyanogen's own.
This makes me wonder if they ever had a real business plan. Understandably, a new venture is likely to lose money the first few years of existence but there better be a well thought out, realistic plan to make a profit. Too Silicon Valley business plans see to be nothing more than buzzword bingo combined with idiotic sales projections of how many will buy a product most do not need nor never heard of.
Samsung has a new kind of removable flash standard that isn't unnecessarily encumbered with Microsoft's patented -- and stupid -- ExFAT. So removable flash may finally be an option on the next Nexus.
I predict that once it comes out the Secure Digital group will drop the dumb requirement. There is no need for 2 billion Android devices based on Linux to require support for Microsoft DOS's brain damaged 8.3 character filenames.
>That's CyanogenMod mortally wounded.
Under warranty probably. But the aftermarket rom there to support your phone long after the manufacturer quits even pretending too (hell most don't even pretend) no. Which is ok with me because Android in general is a get an older model cheap off ebay backup phone proposition anyway.
> That's CyanogenMod mortally wounded.
No. Cyanogen the company is very distinct from CyanogenMod the open source project, which is not seeing much impact. These were not CyanogenMod developers that were fired, these were people that take CyanogenMod code, add a sprinkle of proprietary piss, and depend on the suits to get deals to put their software on phones. Edit: so parasites depending on parasites, basically.
The blokes developing CyanogenMod are still developing CyanogenMod.
No, that's Cyanogen MOD which means there are special hooks in CyanogenOS which allow apps on their app store to be more integrated into the OS than the usual app. It's got nothing to do with CyanogenMod... really, they couldn't have thought up of a more confusing name for it.
AC: Are you saying Cyanogen, Inc didn't contribute bugfixes back to CyanogenMod or that some CyanogenOS developers weren't hired because of their work on CyanogenMod?
I don't know why Cyanogen doesn't sell direct to the public rather than promoting obscure cell phones hosting their commercial OS. Android is dynamic, buggy as hell and most cell makers have no interest in software. I know I would pay a small monthly fee to have a third party maintain a good OS, manage bug reports, and provide regular builds. Cyanogenmod is so close to being a great OS but free volunteers struggle to maintain undocumented chipset drivers. It tarnishes the Cyanogen name.
You mean like how several OEMs got together to create the Symbian Foundation to manage core OS and development and they did they outer layer customization? True, that had its own flaws, but frankly I quite liked that idea. You need a few roughly even-sized partners to make it work though. I think it's too late for Android though, Google's current licence already prohibits OEMs from dabbling with AOSP-based alternatives.