back to article One container to rule them all? No. Um, a plastic box* refresher

Containers are the cool toy meaning two things: new technology and hype. At heart, containers are simple: group the minimum set of files needed to run a particular program into a single directory tree, then run it with some kind of isolation mechanism, so that as far as that process is concerned, it's the only thing on the …

  1. M7S
    Coat

    A non-programmer writes...

    Re: "On Unix, the first program that runs after the kernel boots is init"

    I seem to have met many of its human counterparts.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Countdown Tech

    Docker, Bocker, next it will be Aocker, mind you they left out C... for some reason.

    1. Alistair
      Coat

      Re: Countdown Tech

      --- Oh look:

      What is this Locker thing? is it just like Docker?.........

      1. wayward4now

        Re: Countdown Tech

        Good article, Liam! Funny that no one mentions Proxmox. They've been in the trenches long time! Ric

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Countdown Tech

        "What is this Locker thing? is it just like Docker?........."

        Overheard the other day "Blog, that is like a Vlog, but just writing"

    2. Desidero

      Re: Countdown Tech

      Mad Blogs and Englishmen no doubt...

  3. energystar
    Boffin

    Integrity advantage...

    The container got corrupted? Full erase and instance again...

    Really useful for services. Thinking of local services requesting high availability.

  4. fnj

    LXD FTW

    The only one you really need is LXD. Just ignore all the others, unless some outside influence forces you to muck with them. There is no point to Docker. LXD can do everything Docker can do, plus a whole lot more, with very little added overhead. And you get normal syslogging and all the other normal init management. You don't have to adopt a whole other way of operating inside the container.

    LXD is just as useful as KVM or Xen, as long as you are just virtualizing linux inside linux - but with much less overhead.

  5. StrategicalIT

    Great article, thanks Liam. Looking forward to the next one that covers "radical changes in Linux distro design, which we will look at in the next article.".

  6. Dinsdale247

    FreeBSD Jails

    FreeBSD has had jails since BSD 4.0. ZFS allows for write-on-copy, thin-cloning, snapshots and a ton of other features. FreeBSD has tools called ezjail and iocage as well as a few others, but unlike GNU/Linux, there is only one underlying technology, making it far more stable and widely compatible.

    Oh, and I forgot to mention, it can run GNU as well.

    https://wiki.freebsd.org/VIMAGE/Linux/CentOS55

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021