Beam-forming is great but mobile devices are too compact to incorporate beam-forming MIMO antennas. So, we have cell towers that can beamform to the device but a low powered device which also can't beamform it's reply and so I worry that the device can 'hear' the tower, but not the other way round. Increasing gain on the tower would just increase the SNR.. How would this work?
Ericsson: 5G migration won't be a terrifying slog. No. We have ‘plug-ins’
All the network equipment providers are engaged in major operator projects which they hope will guarantee them a place in those MNOs’ 5G rollouts in the coming years. This week, it was certainly the turn of Ericsson to score 5G marketing points, with a series of operator engagements around the world, and the announcement of 5G …
COMMENTS
-
-
Friday 24th June 2016 21:07 GMT Commswonk
Oh dear... again
...because operators will not tolerate another big bang upgrade
Once again I find myself thinking that HMG seeing 5G as a suiitable replacement for TETRA is another opportunity for an epic Fail. I can't see police / fire / ambulance being happy with a new system that dribbles into service in slow time. While the TETRA roll - out wasn't quite "big bang" any loss of functionality while 5G meanders into service is unlikely to be seen as satisfactory.
I'm still trying to work out how electronically steerable beams can be of any help to multiple users in different locations within individual cells, even if the name "talk group" isn't retained.
-
Thursday 18th August 2016 10:04 GMT Howard Cole
Plug-ins
"By calling them plug-ins, a term that usually applies to web applications, Ericsson made its offerings sound simple, modern and unthreatening"
Is it just me getting old? Since when did plug-ins not refer to something with a plug. I think you'll find this is a term used by the software and web developers that is borrowed from the good old hardware with connectors era.