Some of these people have managed to escape from repressive regimes, with secret-police monitoring all their communications; they must wonder what has happened to the UK since they started their journey to "freedom"...
Home Office declares: Detained immigrants shall have internet
The Home Office has issued guidance demanding that immigration detainees are provided with internet access so they can maintain “links with friends, families and legal representatives and to prepare for removal.” Publishing Detention Services Order 04/2016 (PDF) the Home Office has responded to an independent review into the …
COMMENTS
-
-
Tuesday 17th May 2016 14:22 GMT Alexander J. Martin
Indeed, and it isn't nice to think that we're not welcoming genuine asylum seekers (let's not lie to ourselves, there are certainly those who are merely breaking the law) but where there is a need for border control there is also a need to ensure that we're treating those being detained at our borders with dignity, and the ability to communicate with family and have access to news and other factors affecting claims is widely recognised to be an important part of that. It's interesting that the Home Office is running against the findings of both those running these centres and the indie reviewer in denying them access to social media.
-
-
Tuesday 17th May 2016 14:24 GMT Jay 2
The other day I was watching (what I think was) 24 Hours In Police Custody on C4, and in that the police had picked up quite a few illegal immigrants. As part of the processing the men were separated from the women and children. One of the men was repeatedly asking where his family was, but could get no answer. Even when he was released (not to a detention centre), no-one seemed to know where his family were. Fortunately after a day or two he made contact with his wife via Facebook and found they were in a hotel not too far away.
Given the proliferation of FB/WhatsApp/etc nowadays of being the primary weapons of choice, blocking them doesn't exactly help the detainees maintain links.
-
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
Tuesday 17th May 2016 18:27 GMT Chris Fox
Magical thinking
"It is the responsibility of the centre suppliers to ensure that detainees electronic communications are monitored, and that any privileged material (such as legal correspondence) is excluded from all monitoring."
How's that supposed to work? Suppliers are required to monitor communications, but if it turns out to be legally privileged they have to go back in time and unmonitor it? And as for the downloading and uploading of *any* files being prohibited; by what other magical means is Internet access supposed to work?
Perhaps this comes from the same Home Office brains that gave us such great ideas as secure encryption with backdoors, or that argue bulk collection, storage, indexing and querying of all communications meta data somehow does not count as "mass surveillance".
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-