
"...15.8 million record of fingerprints..."
Hashes, or actual images?
Not that it really matters... We tend to leave them around everywhere.
As has been pointed out, they're usernames (not passwords).
A massive data breach appears to have left 55 million Philippine voters at much greater risk of identity fraud and more. Security researchers warn that the entire database of the Philippines’ Commission on Elections (COMELEC) has been exposed in what appears to be the biggest government related data breach in history. The …
> Hashes, or actual images?
>Not that it really matters...
It does matter - especially if the hash is engineered to be non-reversable (I used to work for a company that made fingerprint readers and ours were specifically engineered to not be reversable - unlike quite a few of our competitors..)
So it's the difference between someone being able to make a convincing clone of your fingerprint and not.
Although I agree in one sense - with all the other info in the dump I suspect that fingerprints will be one of the last things the bad guys will try to use.
> Pretty soon nobody will have the luxury of being able to hide anything.
Maybe we're going about this the wrong way.
Problem: if someone learns your national identity number they can commit identity fraud by claiming to be you.
Solution: *Publish* everyone's national identity number. Then knowledge of somebody's identity number automatically has *zero* trustworthiness. Banks and the like would be forced to use other methods to confirm your identity.
Repeat for credit card numbers etc.
The ICO has recently confirmed (RFA0612308) that ANY information found in the public domain does not require consent to process it. In other words, if this breach were related to UK individuals, then any UK organisation would not be unlawfully processing personal information by processing it - even if they were well aware that it had come from a breach. They'd be unfairly processing the information sure, but not unlawfully because for it to be unlawful - section 55 of the DPA, they would have to knowingly process the information without the consent of the data controller. But according to the ICO, consent is not required for information that is found in the public domain.