Speaking in Tech: Batman vs Superman... absolutely sucked speaking_in_tech Greg Knieriemen podcast enterprise Hosted by Greg Knieriemen, Ed Saipetch and Sarah Vela. This week, it's Ed, Greg and Sarah and no guests... just the gang discussing bad superhero movies, listener complaints, Oracle suing Google (again) and Australian bike bells –and taking people out to the woodshed... …
who even postulated the merest thought that "batman vs Superman" was EVER going to be anything but a steaming dog egg that even rats in the sewer would wretch at and do anything to get away from its stench is living in cuckoo land.
The only positive reviews will come from shills and the team who created this travesty.
Depends on what the 'win' conditions were.
There's a premis that all Batman has to do is stand up to Superman in order to win: To show the world that Superman isn't beyond reproach. It also helps Superman out as it makes him look less like a god and more like a person.
So what was the goal of the conflict? To see who would walk away from the conflict, or was the goal something subtler? Like reminding Superman that he's not a god?
Might have been given a lukewarm reception by the Critics but the agerage punter has votes and gone to see the pile of steaming dog poo.
Personally, I'd rather watch paint dry.
I may watch it on a long flight when there is nothing else to do. I certainly won't be parting with cash to see it. There again us Grumpy Old Men are not the target audience for this sort of thing.
I'm sure that in Cinemas all over the USA there is plenty of a whooping and a hollering during the film.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
