Good luck with that.
Police in New York City used stingray mobile phone trackers on more than one thousand occasions since 2008. So says the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), which obtained records from NYPD detailing their use of the devices while investigating cases. According to the NYCLU report, between 2008 and May of 2015 police used …
Actually, a Stingray device forces all nearby phones to connect to it, and the figures in the article don't include for how long the devices were used each time, nor the number of phones affected.
Being quite the cynical regarding police forces and their usually lax interpretation of citizen's rights, I'd guess that all the data recorded was kept by said police forces, just in case. A thousand stingray deployments may well have captured data from many millions of devices.
1) The city's suggestion: "Don't turn on the phone" requires quite a bit of faith that the phone can actually be turned off. This is by no means guaranteed on a sealed phone with an "always on" baseband processor. Like, pretty much every phone being used by folks who can afford to live in NYC.
2) Being in range of a Stingray also (IIRC) forces the phone down to 2G, where encryption is much weaker. If you have nothing to hide from random criminals who bought interception gear on the dark web, no problem. (Not to mention that your cat-videos get either very blocky or slow)
The city's suggestion: "Don't turn on the phone" requires quite a bit of faith that the phone can actually be turned off
It also requires that the citizens renounce to use phones in order to preserve one of their human rights, and in this connected world we live in the lack of a mobile phone probably will undercut several other citizen's rights by curtailing their ability to comunicate, socialize or even carry out their jobs.
This Baltimore City's suggestion is absolutely sub-standard, even coming from politicians!
Some time ago in Germany (I forget when or where I read it), the police were very suspicious of a man they stopped because he didn't have a mobile phone. They said to him that this indicated he was probably involved in criminal activity and didn't want to be monitored or traced.
What is the ideal response to these cases, do not track innocent peopke, only the bad guys, technology is not there yet, or is there... by employing better detectives? All comes down to money, cheaper to eavesdrop hundreds of thousands people than to pay 1000 teams of detectives...
What is the name of a political system or government that when empowered by their people doesn't have an option to abuse the power given by them... we should start drafting something to this effect. Any proposals?
Since you raised the point, supposedly, the Stingray system drops and ignores the phones of those the cops aren't interested in. I say "supposedly" because that's what the FBI claimed in court. Funny thing is, they've dropped charges against alleged crims rather than reveal how the system works or where the data (all the data) goes.
I wasn't discussing "right" and "wrong" originally but only what I'd do if I were a crim.
Those who are seriously concerned can purchase Faraday bags from various sources, including Amazon. If money is a problem, wrapping securely in aluminum foil ought to do a pretty good job. Those of us slow to update also have the option of popping out the battery on occasion.
Either makes the phone pretty useless, though.
"The city has countered with the argument that if people don't want to be tracked, they should not turn on their mobile phones..."
If people don't want to be peeked upon, don't live in houses with windows.
If people don't want to be censored, don't write thoughts on paper.
If people don't want to be robbed, don't carry money.
If people don't want to be defrauded, don't make investments.
If people don't want to be arrested, don't walk on sidewalks or drive on streets.
If people don't want to live in a police state, don't live in the United States.
There ... unassailable logic.
I frequently see signs around car parks....
"Do not leave valuables in plain view in your car" or similar.
Because there are people around who have very different minds than most of us and they don't feel any guilt when they commit a crime, nor do they consider the consequences or give any thought to the fact that justice is going to come after them.
So, it's pretty smart to be defensive against such folk. Even though we have a perfect right to leave that laptop on display, there is always the one with the broken mind that we need to defend against.
As for the NYPD tracking me on my last visit to NYC, that must have been very tedious for them.
If you use your phone in your house, aren't they breaking the 4th Amendment in an even more egregious way than normal?
They *could* argue that using a mobile in public means you have no expectation of privacy - but that same argument cannot be made if you use your phone in your own house.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021