back to article Can DevOps and Agile save the planet? thinks so

Whacking DevOps on your business card doesn’t make you instantly more valuable. It could also make you a certified guardian of the planet too. Or at least, certified software supplier to the guardians of the planet. At least that’s what we think the US’s Environmental Protection Agency is getting at with its latest efforts to …

  1. K

    DevOps Man...

    Neither Developer, nor Operator..his superpower is being mediocre is all fields!

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: DevOps Man...

      Web development alone is more than any one person can fathom, these days... and yeah, I do a little ops too. Being a generalist has its advantages. I just wish I could find some specialists to help... but everyone's a damn generalist...

      18F will probably do some good, mainly by bringing development in-house. Latching onto last decade's hype trains, not so much.

      "DevOps" isn't really devs who do some ops, though - it's the guys who specialize in scaling up and out to thousands of servers, right? As in "to hell with efficient code, just throw more CPUs [and megawatts] at your problem!" Not sure how that squares with "green" :)

    2. Dr Who

      Re: DevOps Man...

      Indeed. We should all shy away from mediocrity and instead make sure we check our posts for typographical errors before hitting the submit button.

  2. captain veg Silver badge

    methodology de jour

    When I started out you had to be able to plausibly claim knowledge of SSADM and/or Jackson Structured Programming to get past most job interviews.

    Never actually used either.

    It's just code, innit?


  3. Arthur 1 Bronze badge


    I have the sinking feeling that since they're somehow equating modern rapid dev practices with environmentalism (new = green, I guess?) we'll see a lot of nodejs and the like running these offerings. I'm wondering how the philosophy of 'who cares about compute, use stuff that's faster to dev and throw more servers at it' is green, when you're basically torpedoing your perf/watt on purpose to save on payroll?

    I'm not suggesting we write everything as a custom web server in asm to make it green or anything (that would be ridiculous and hopefully isn't the outcome here either) but let's not claim that these philosophies line up with environmental goals when they don't.

    On the other hand it might be a nice inciting incident to force people legislating tech to actually understand tech.

    1. Vic

      Re: Green?

      I'm not suggesting we write everything as a custom web server in asm to make it green or anything

      It's surprisingly easy to write dynamic Apache modules with apxs; that's not quite asm, but C is close enough.

      You do need to think through whether or not that is the right thing to do, of course...


      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Green?

        > they're somehow equating modern rapid dev practices with environmentalism

        This is the EPA talking, not bonafide tree huggers. Not that either group is known for having a clue about technology.

        > we'll see a lot of nodejs and the like

        As 'web langs' go, nodejs IS more efficient than php, python, ruby... and genuinely useful in limited circumstances... but even more tedious and error-prone. And it's a wholly different skillset from browser JS. I'm sure we will see more of it, though, until it burns these people.

        Waste is mostly an attitude problem, however. Look at all the sites slowing to a crawl under the strain of browser JS bells+whistles, even with fast JS engines. Lazy f---s will find a way to make it even worse, even if they all switch back to asm.

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward


    As someone who has worked with the Govt extensively this is a joke Devops and Agile are about making changes and doing things quickly to react to market or other forces....nothing in the government happens quickly or reacts without 40 layers of bureaucracy slowing down even the simplest of changes.

  5. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward


    I always thought agile was about deskilling, to achieve the ideal of cheap interchangeable engineering units, but that might just be my inner curmudgeon talking

    1. captain veg Silver badge

      Re: agile

      *All* development methodologies are about protecting employers from the combined efforts of large numbers of semi-competent coders.

      The problem is that a good programmer can be easily 10 times better -- whether that means more productive, writing more robust and/or efficient code, or probably some combination thereof -- than a mediocre one, but that mediocrity outnumbers excellence by a lot more than 10 to 1.


      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: agile

        Yep, that is why you promote the good programmers to management, where they can be mediocre too

        1. This post has been deleted by its author

  6. tom dial Silver badge

    US Government IT : Agile :: Elephant : Kitten.

    When I retired at the end of 2011, my agency had just started to deploy Windows 7 to a few developers for evaluation. I expect they, like the Navy and Marine Corps, still have a significant number of Windows XP workstations, along with a POA&M to replace them real soon.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022