
A cost so small...
...that there is no incentive to spend money on security to avoid being hacked.
Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE) has agreed to pay up to $8m (£5.18m) to settle a lawsuit stemming from its 2014 IT security meltdown. The movie studio will pay out damages after the personal details of 47,000 current and former employees leaked onto the internet following a network breach said to have stemmed from its …
People bought Vhs rather than the superior Beta*.
This forced Sony to buy studios to guarantee source for any future formats, and as a major format inventor I don't blame them.
Then the people in these new offshoots ruin the reputation of the core company.
* I have a 950 so can prove it
"People bought Vhs rather than the superior Beta"
Sony shafted themselves by refusing to licence the Beta standard to other manufacturers. As mentioned here before, Sony are masters of incompatibilty. The non-standard memory cards for cameras springs to mind. I was suprised to see that Sony actually offered Android 'phones.
It's more than a decade now since Sony's famous rootkit got blown open but we remember.
You have to admit that things are still suspicious. I wonder how much The Interview would have made if the attack hadn't happened...??? Hollywood movies are full of conspiracy and devious plots. Maybe SONY believed their scripts and pulled one off in real life?
Are they serious? 2 million? Let me get this straight. Pirating a single movie costs apparently costs them hundreds of thousands in damages, but the identity and health information of their employees can be capped at such a ridiculously low number.
I hope a large number of their staff resign in disgust (or at least start applying elsewhere). They have nailed their true colours to the mast.