I suppose they intend to deliver the prize by hand
thus
the icon
(if the NSA get to it on the way)
Whistleblower-in-chief Edward Snowden has been nominated for the European Parliament’s human rights prize, for a second time. The nominations for the 2015 Sakharov Prize were decided last week, with Snowden getting the nod again after losing to Malala Yousafzai, the teenage Pakistani girl who defied the Taliban, in 2013. The …
I think you should be recognized around the world for taking on the power-hungry apparatchiks (not any longer a purely Russian word).
Personally, I think it would send an even stronger message if the committees decide to award multiple human right prizes rather than a single one. Seeing Ed Snowden (even virtually) being honored along with some other stellar examples of humanity would show the world that good deeds can come in lots of ways.
That seems excessive to me.
As far as anyone has divulged, there was no loss of life due to Snowdens actions, however just or unjust we might each perceive them to be. Radiation sickness seems like an awful way to die, and I'm at a loss as to what possible thought process has brought you to believe it acceptable in this instance?
Care to enlighten me, as I'm genuinely interested?
Anyone with a legal skillset care to explain how that could work?
My legally uneducated take, almost certain to be wrong, is that the EU arrest warrant would force his extradition to Britain should we so request it. Britains extradition arrangements with the use may perhaps best be desrcibed as being both streamlined, and one-sided.
How then could Snowden accept asylum anywhere in the EU, and be safe from extradition? I'm assuming America will want Snowden the second he comes within reach.
Given the choices facing Ed, I'd choose the freedom and quality of life in Russia over a small dark cell or potential patriot induced pine box in America. And I love America (sorry, I know its not the "in" thing to say, but I love the place, not their /our foreign policy).