
Thank $deity
"1.7m-long"
"the ancestors of modern spiders"
I, for one, am grateful that they grew smaller.
Scientists have unearthed the remains of a "bizarre" monster sea scorpion which 460 million years ago prowled the oceans covering what is now North America. The remains of the 1.7m-long eurypterid Pentecopterus decorahensis were found in Iowa by a team led by Yale's Dr James Lamsdell. They reveal multiple forelimbs probably …
Land arthropods are limited in size by their oxygenation system, usually trachea or book lungs, and lack of the circulatory system found in vertebrates. Basically, any tissue that was more than an inch or so from the surface wouldn't be able to get enough oxygen from the atmosphere and would die. Marine arthropods, such as lobsters and this beauty, don't have the same limitation.
Normally I quite like spiders. But if the wife complains about finding one of these in the bath, she's on her own.
We're also going to have to re-write that song about the old lady who swallowed a fly. I don't think a bird is going to cut it, when it comes to dealing with this spider. Which I'd imagine won't so much wriggle, as rampage...
I know an old lady
Who swallowed a lion
The smaller ones can still be pretty creepy.
(By the way, Wong's book is a fine novel, but probably not suitable for arachnophobes.)
One of the local TV stations just finished broadcasting the one season of "Primeval: New World", which is a sort-of followon to the UK "Primeval".
IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2295953/?ref_=fn_al_tt_5
The two-part season ender featured giant scorpions. I found this article very timely.
Now we just have to find out how to control the "anomolies".
They found something new and by our standards, it's "bizarre". But was it bizarre for the period in which it lived? The "aggressive" part also.. why would they think that? It's just as possible it was a run of the mill meal item for something else.
Disclaimer: They may be right. I was raised to question everything from speculation about fossils to politicians and in the last 15 years have added being skeptical when someone says "we take your privacy seriously".
Well, the person who described it as bizarre is a palaeontologist so yes, I think they do know what they're talking about for that period. Behaviour is more tricky, but I think that it's pretty clear this ain't going to survive on seaweed.
DOI: not a palaeontologist; I am relying entirely on the reported expert opinion, which at least seems plausible.