CERT vs ACSC
Mmmmm .... I trusted the old independent unfunded CERT for its timely reports and responses. Then the government bought in AusCERT, which was a totally different proposition ... a mob of government bureaucrats and amateur IT security wannabe's ... that morphed into the ACSC - which as far as I can see has done nothing to justify its humungous and ever-increasing budget in all the time it has been in place.
Still, it's run by the Australian government - so it must be 'world's best practice' ... right?
Is it just me, or would they have been better off simply giving the old CERT 25-50% of the budget the ACSC attracts - and relying on an independent body that actually worked and knew what they were doing?