back to article The green salamander is out: Cisco gives up on Invicta flash arrays

That’s that then: it was a $415m mistake. We have heard from several sources that Cisco has laid off virtually the entire Invicta all-flash array engineering and development team. If true, Cisco – still led by John Chambers – has admitted the 2013 Whiptail acquisition was a complete cock-up. Timing-wise, this has happened at …

  1. Nate Amsden


    how much fun I could have with $415M

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: oh...

      You could buy a decent business and kill it for one.

      Anyone prepared to offers odds on a Nimble purchase?

      1. This post has been deleted by a moderator

      2. Trevor_Pott Gold badge

        Re: oh...

        ...why, for the love of Jibbers, why?

        Buy Tintri. Or Pure. Actually, do they have enough money for Pure?

        Fuck it. Buy SimpliVity. They're already close buddies anyways. At least then they'd be buying the future (hyperconvergence) instead of the past (arrays). Besides, Cisco's customers don't mind proprietary bits, so the accelerator card shouldn't bother them.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Cisco Acquisition Targets?

    Nutanix or Nimble!?! Maybe. We keep hearing about a Pure Storage acquisition "in the works." I suppose it would include a Cisco logo change to orange!

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    if I had a dollar for every storage rumor

    that cisco was aimed to purchase another storage company, I'd be retired. Fact remains, they have no real reason to do so. They have partnered with every storage vendor under the sun to sell higher margin products and in turn not piss off the masses. Invicta was a failure purchase, but in the grand scheme of things a fairly cheap mistake compared to some others. Consider this a failure of the previous management team who appear to have all left recently.

  4. Joe 48


    Such a shame if this is true. I still think invicta on a blade in a UCS Chassis could have been quite a powerhouse.

    Nutanix would make sense. Cisco have the hardware, Nutanix have the software, put it on 3100 series or what ever its called (Never really sell them) and you've got a decent hyperconverged setup. Better yet stuff if on 8 blades in a UCS Mini and you've got a monster. Using a UCS mini they could call it super-hyper-converged.... Or something similarly daft anyway. That'd be a monster setup!

    I've downloaded the community version of Nutanix but still not testied it on a UCS Blade. The new Demo UCS Mini and Nimble CS215 should be here in the next few weeks so as soon as I've got a few deployments out of the way its play time!! I'll be playing with Nutanix first!

    1. Smoking Gun

      Re: Shame

      How many disks can you get in a UCS Blade? 2? I don't think that would make a good hyper-converged option.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Shame

        You would be surprised. The Cisco hardware team has prototype blades they have shown customers that have MANY drives. Lots of depth in the UCS chassis...

  5. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    What really is a shame is how Cisco treated the entire acquisition. If you thought they looked confused on positioning from the outside, you can only imagine what was going on inside the company. Half of senior management was outright hostile to the idea of having in-house storage arrays, couple that with being in the middle of a big LR and you have the perfect storm where the non-supporters can strangle the headcount budget.

    If you strangle headcount growth in a recently acquired startup and expect to be able to transition existing products to new platforms as well as continue develop cutting edge features while simultaneously raising the bar for testing and interoperability, its very easy to predict the result. Which in turn allows the original dissenters to declare failure.

    In the end, from a bigger picture perspective it looks like Cisco doesnt really want to be in the array business and is likely to do something they understand better (and this is a good thing) like hyperconverged. This will allow them to leverage their considerable strength in compute while minimizing their risk, and should provide them with a better return.

  6. This post has been deleted by its author

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021